vsversusfinder

Lowrance 000-0106-72 HST-WSBL Transom-Mount vs Scotty 367 Universal Fish Finder Mount - Up to 9"

Updated August 2026 — Lowrance 000-0106-72 HST-WSBL Transom-Mount leads on compatibility and features.

The Lowrance 000-0106-72 offers superior functionality and performance compared to the Scotty 367, making it the better choice for serious anglers.

Why Lowrance 000-0106-72 HST-WSBL Transom-Mount is better

Functionality

Offers depth and temperature readings.

Performance

Range of up to 1,000 feet.

Compatibility

Works with a wide range of Lowrance devices.

Why Scotty 367 Universal Fish Finder Mount - Up to 9" is better

Price

More affordable option.

Simplicity

Easy to use as a mount.

Weight

Lighter and easier to handle.

Overall score

Lowrance 000-0106-72 HST-WSBL Transom-Mount
85
Scotty 367 Universal Fish Finder Mount - Up to 9"
65

Specifications

SpecLowrance 000-0106-72 HST-WSBL Transom-MountScotty 367 Universal Fish Finder Mount - Up to 9"
Frequency83/200 kHzN/A
Temperature SensorYesNo
Mount TypeTransomUniversal
Connector7-PinN/A
DurabilityHighMedium

Dimension comparison

Lowrance 000-0106-72 HST-WSBL Transom-MountScotty 367 Universal Fish Finder Mount - Up to 9"

Overview of the Lowrance 000-0106-72 and Scotty 367

When it comes to enhancing your fishing experience, both the Lowrance 000-0106-72 and the Scotty 367 offer unique benefits. The Lowrance 000-0106-72 is a transom-mount skimmer transducer known for its depth and temperature readings, while the Scotty 367 is a versatile fish finder mount designed to support displays up to 9 inches. With prices of $65.99 and $43.00 respectively, the Lowrance is about 35% more expensive than the Scotty.

Design and Build Quality

The design and build quality of the Lowrance 000-0106-72 and the Scotty 367 cater to different needs. The Lowrance features a durable skimmer housing built to withstand tough marine conditions, ensuring consistent performance over time. Its 20-foot cable allows for flexible placement on various boat sizes. In contrast, the Scotty 367 is specifically a mount, designed for ease of use and adaptability, but it does not provide direct functionality like the Lowrance. The Scotty’s design focuses on supporting different fish finder displays, emphasizing its role as a stable platform rather than a standalone device.

Functionality and Features

The Lowrance 000-0106-72 excels in functionality, offering dual-frequency operation (83/200 kHz) for reliable depth readings and fish detection in different water conditions. It includes a built-in temperature sensor, which adds valuable data for tracking fish behavior. On the other hand, the Scotty 367, while a solid product, lacks these advanced features since it is primarily a mounting solution. This difference in functionality could significantly impact users who prioritize data over merely mounting their devices.

Compatibility

Compatibility is a strong point for the Lowrance 000-0106-72, which integrates seamlessly with a wide range of Lowrance fishfinders and chartplotters. With a 7-pin connector, it accommodates various models, ensuring that users can easily enhance their existing systems. Conversely, the Scotty 367 is designed to hold displays up to 9 inches but does not specify compatibility with fish finders, making it less versatile in this regard. Users should consider their existing equipment when choosing between these two products.

Performance in Real-World Conditions

In real-world conditions, the Lowrance 000-0106-72 delivers impressive performance with a range of up to 1,000 feet at 83 kHz, making it ideal for deep-water fishing. The built-in temperature sensor further enhances its utility by providing critical information for successful fishing trips. The Scotty 367, however, does not contribute to performance in terms of data acquisition, as its function is limited to mounting. Therefore, those looking for a product that improves their fishing success will find the Lowrance to be a superior option.

Price Comparison

In terms of pricing, the Lowrance 000-0106-72 is priced at $65.99, while the Scotty 367 is more affordable at $43.00. This represents a price difference of about $22.99, making the Scotty approximately 35% cheaper than the Lowrance. While cost is a significant factor, potential buyers should weigh the price against the functionality and advantages that each product offers, particularly if they plan to use their fish finder frequently.

Customer Reception

Customer reception varies significantly between the two products. The Lowrance 000-0106-72 holds a sales rank of 12,951, indicating a strong market presence and acceptance among users. Its comprehensive features and performance seem to resonate well with fishing enthusiasts. The Scotty 367, with a sales rank of 28,172, indicates a lower but still respectable level of interest. While customers appreciate its functionality as a mount, those seeking advanced technological features may lean towards the Lowrance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Lowrance 000-0106-72 and the Scotty 367 ultimately depends on your fishing needs and priorities. If you are looking for a product that enhances your fishing experience with detailed depth and temperature readings, the Lowrance is the clear winner despite its higher price. However, if you are in need of a reliable and affordable mount for your existing fish finder, the Scotty 367 offers great value. Consider what you prioritize most: advanced functionality or cost savings, and make your decision accordingly.