LYRSLF Electric Foil Shavers for Men: Mini vs Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable
Updated August 2026 — LYRSLF Electric Foil Shavers for Men: Mini leads on waterproof and battery.
The LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver outperforms the Remington PF7320 in multiple areas, making it the better choice for users.
Why LYRSLF Electric Foil Shavers for Men: Mini is better
Price
LYRSLF is $18.99, while Remington is $29.97.
Battery Life
LYRSLF offers 90 minutes of use compared to Remington's 40 minutes.
Waterproof
LYRSLF has an IPX7 waterproof rating, unlike Remington.
Why Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable is better
Brand
Remington is a well-known brand in the shaving market.
Motor Noise
Remington features a quiet drive advanced motor.
Flexing Foils
Remington has 2X flexing foils for adapting to facial contours.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | LYRSLF Electric Foil Shavers for Men: Mini | Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Time | 2 hours | 24 hours |
| Runtime | 90 minutes | 40 minutes |
| Blade System | 3 blades | 2 foils |
| Display | LED | None |
| USB Charging | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Design and Portability
When it comes to design and portability, the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver stands out with its compact dimensions, making it an ideal travel companion. The LYRSLF measures just 3.39 x 2.37 x 1.22 inches, which enhances its portability for users on the go. In contrast, the Remington PF7320 is larger and less specified for travel, although it does come with a head guard for protection during storage. Travel-friendly features like a magnetic dustproof cap on the LYRSLF also add convenience, while the Remington focuses more on performance. Overall, if portability and ease of storage are priorities, the LYRSLF is the clear winner.
Shaving Performance
In terms of shaving performance, the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver boasts a robust 3-blade system engineered for effective shaving across different beard lengths. It includes two foil shaving blades and a long beard trimming blade, allowing for a versatile shaving experience. The high-speed motor operates at 8,500 RPM, facilitating a fast and precise shave. Meanwhile, the Remington PF7320 features 2 flexing foils that adapt to facial contours, providing a close shave but with a lower cordless runtime of 40 minutes. The LYRSLF offers a more thorough shave thanks to its advanced blade system, positioning it as the better option for those seeking effective results.
Battery Life and Charging
The LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver has a significant advantage in battery life and charging capabilities. It features USB-C fast charging, reaching a full charge in just 2 hours and offering up to 90 minutes of continuous use. In contrast, the Remington PF7320 provides only 40 minutes of cordless runtime and requires a full recharge of 24 hours. While both shavers use universal USB charging, the LYRSLF's faster charging and longer usage time make it a more convenient choice for users who are frequently on the move.
Cleaning and Maintenance
Regarding cleaning and maintenance, the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver excels with its IPX7 waterproof design, allowing for easy cleaning under running water. Its detachable magnetic head simplifies the cleaning process, making it suitable for both wet and dry shaving. The Remington PF7320 does not specify a waterproof feature, which may limit its cleaning options. The ability to rinse the LYRSLF quickly under a faucet adds to its convenience, making it a more practical choice for users who prioritize hygiene in their grooming routine.
User Experience
User experience heavily favors the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver due to its ergonomic design and lightweight build. The 3D flexible floating design allows it to adapt effortlessly to the curves of the face, enhancing comfort during use. The LED display provides real-time information on power status and charging progress, adding to the user-friendly interface. On the other hand, the Remington PF7320 features a quiet drive advanced motor designed for less vibration and noise, but it lacks the same level of ergonomic attention. For users who value comfort and ease of use, the LYRSLF provides a more satisfying shaving experience.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
In terms of brand reputation and sales rank, the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver holds a better position with a sales rank of 13,464, indicating a strong popularity among consumers. The Remington PF7320, with a sales rank of 67,944, suggests it may not be as well-received in the market. While both brands have established themselves in the electric shaver category, the higher sales rank of the LYRSLF reflects a more favorable consumer perception, which can be a crucial factor when making a purchasing decision.
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver is about 17% cheaper at $18.99 compared to the Remington PF7320, which is priced at $29.97. This lower price point makes the LYRSLF a more attractive option for budget-conscious consumers without compromising on features or performance. The price difference can be significant for those looking to maximize value, especially considering the additional functionalities offered by the LYRSLF.
Which should you buy?
After comparing the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver and the Remington PF7320, it's clear that the LYRSLF emerges as the superior choice. With a more compact design, better shaving performance, longer battery life, and a user-friendly experience, it outshines the Remington in multiple areas. Additionally, its lower price makes it a more budget-friendly option. For anyone seeking a reliable, effective, and convenient electric shaver, the LYRSLF Electric Foil Shaver is the way to go.

