M-AUDIO M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface for vs Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with
Updated July 2026 — Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with leads on audio quality and price.
The M-AUDIO M-Track Solo is an affordable and portable option for beginners, while the Yamaha URX22C offers superior audio quality and versatility for serious users.
Why M-AUDIO M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface for is better
Price
M-AUDIO is significantly cheaper at $49.00
Portability
M-AUDIO is lightweight and easy to carry
Simplicity
M-AUDIO is user-friendly for beginners
Why Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with is better
Audio Quality
Yamaha supports 32-bit/192kHz audio resolution
Input Options
Yamaha has two combo inputs and MIDI I/O
Build Quality
Yamaha features a rugged full-metal housing
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | M-AUDIO M-Track Solo USB Audio Interface for | Yamaha 2-in/2-out USB-C Audio/MIDI Interface with |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 48kHz | 32-bit/192kHz |
| Inputs | 1 combo | 2 combo |
| MIDI I/O | No | Yes |
| Monitoring | Zero-latency | DSP-powered |
| Software | ProTools First, MPC Beats | Cubase AI, Steinberg Plus |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the M-AUDIO M-Track Solo and Yamaha URX22C
The M-AUDIO M-Track Solo is priced at $49.00, while the Yamaha URX22C comes in at $186.99, making the M-AUDIO about 74% cheaper. Both interfaces serve as excellent choices for recording, streaming, and podcasting, but they each cater to different user needs. The M-Track Solo is designed for users seeking a simple, portable solution, while the Yamaha URX22C offers more advanced features, appealing to those who need versatility and higher audio quality.
Audio Quality and Performance
The M-AUDIO M-Track Solo delivers audio resolution at 48kHz, which is sufficient for most home recordings and podcasting needs. In contrast, the Yamaha URX22C supports a higher 32-bit/192kHz audio resolution, providing superior clarity and depth in recordings. This difference in audio quality may be particularly noticeable to professional users or those producing high-fidelity music. Furthermore, the Yamaha's Class-A D-PRE mic preamps add another layer of quality, ensuring a cleaner and more dynamic audio capture.
Input and Output Options
In terms of input options, the M-AUDIO M-Track Solo features one combo XLR/Line input and one Line/Instrument input, which is adequate for basic recording needs. The Yamaha URX22C, however, boasts two combo inputs, making it more versatile for multi-instrument setups. Additionally, the Yamaha offers MIDI I/O, which is essential for users who want to connect MIDI devices. This combination of features positions the Yamaha as a more comprehensive choice for musicians and producers looking to explore a wider range of audio inputs.
Monitoring Capabilities
Monitoring capabilities are crucial for recording, and both devices offer unique features in this area. The M-AUDIO M-Track Solo includes a USB/Direct switch for zero-latency monitoring, allowing users to hear their input signal without delay. The Yamaha URX22C also provides latency-free monitoring, enhanced by its DSP-powered effects, including reverb and channel strip emulations. This feature allows users to apply effects in real-time, making it a more appealing choice for those who want to enhance their recordings during the monitoring phase.
Software Bundles
The M-AUDIO M-Track Solo comes with a software suite that includes ProTools First and MPC Beats, making it a compelling option for beginners who want to get started quickly. The Yamaha URX22C also includes a software package, offering Cubase AI and Steinberg Plus, which are excellent for users looking for professional-grade music production tools. Both bundles cater to different user preferences, with the M-AUDIO leaning towards entry-level software while the Yamaha provides more advanced options for seasoned users.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of the M-AUDIO M-Track Solo is portable and lightweight, making it easy to carry for on-the-go recording. However, it may not withstand extensive wear and tear compared to the Yamaha URX22C, which features a rugged full-metal housing designed for durability. This construction is particularly beneficial for users who plan to use the interface in various environments, such as live settings or frequent travel. The sturdiness of the Yamaha may justify its higher price for those prioritizing reliability.
Target Audience
The M-AUDIO M-Track Solo is tailored for hobbyists, podcasters, and musicians who require a simple and economical solution for basic recording needs. Its ease of use and affordability make it accessible to beginners. On the other hand, the Yamaha URX22C targets more serious musicians and content creators who require higher audio quality, greater input flexibility, and advanced monitoring capabilities. The price difference reflects these varying target audiences, making each product suitable for its respective user base.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the M-AUDIO M-Track Solo and Yamaha URX22C should be guided by your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for an affordable, straightforward audio interface for basic recording and streaming, the M-AUDIO M-Track Solo at $49.00 is a fantastic option. However, if you prioritize audio quality, versatility, and professional features, the Yamaha URX22C, priced at $186.99, offers significant advantages. Ultimately, consider your recording aspirations and the level of complexity you're willing to manage before making your decision.

