Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface vs MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface
Updated August 2026 — MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface leads on software bundle and features.
The Mackie Audio Interface offers a budget-friendly option with robust features, while the MOTU M2 provides advanced capabilities and additional content for a higher price.
Why Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface is better
Price
Mackie is significantly cheaper at $54.95.
Durability
Mackie's 'Built-Like-A-Tank' design emphasizes ruggedness.
Musician Features
Mackie includes a Hi-Z switch for guitar inputs.
Why MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface is better
Audio Quality
Both offer 24-bit/192kHz, but MOTU has hardware monitoring.
Bundled Content
MOTU includes over 6GB of free content.
Connectivity
MOTU uses USB-C for faster data transfer.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Mackie Audio Interface, Onyx Artist 1X2 USB Audio Interface | MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Recording | 24-bit/192kHz | 24-bit/192kHz |
| Preamps | 1 Onyx | 2 Preamps |
| Phantom Power | Yes | Yes |
| Monitoring | Zero-latency | Hardware monitoring |
| USB Type | USB 2.0 | USB-C |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Mackie Audio Interface and MOTU M2
The Mackie Audio Interface is priced at $54.95, while the MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface comes at a significantly higher price of $199.95, making the Mackie about 73% cheaper. This price difference may influence which audio interface is more appealing based on budget constraints. Both products target musicians and content creators, but their features and performance capabilities vary greatly.
Features and Capabilities
The Mackie Audio Interface boasts high-resolution 24-bit/192kHz recording capabilities along with an Onyx mic preamp, which delivers boutique-quality sound. It includes 48v phantom power for condenser mics, a Hi-Z switch for guitar inputs, and zero-latency monitoring. In contrast, the MOTU M2 also offers 24-bit/192kHz audio quality but adds hardware monitoring and comes with over 6GB of free content for macOS, Windows, and iOS users. While both interfaces share similar audio quality specs, the Mackie provides more dedicated features for musicians, such as the Hi-Z switch.
Design and Build Quality
The Mackie Audio Interface is described as having a "Built-Like-A-Tank" design, emphasizing its durability for mobile recording. This robust build is ideal for users who need equipment that can withstand regular travel and usage. On the other hand, the MOTU M2's design isn’t explicitly described, but it is a USB-C audio interface, which is generally known for sleek aesthetics and modern connectivity. Users looking for a rugged interface for on-the-go recording may lean toward the Mackie, while those prioritizing modern design may prefer the MOTU.
Connectivity Options
Mackie's interface features USB 2.0 connectivity, which is noted for fast transfer speeds and low latency. It also includes outputs for studio monitors and a headphone output, enabling versatile setup options. Conversely, the MOTU M2 employs USB-C technology, which can provide faster data transfer rates compared to USB 2.0. While both interfaces allow for direct monitoring, the inclusion of USB-C in the MOTU may appeal to users with newer devices that support this connection type.
Target User Base
The Mackie Audio Interface is particularly suited for singer-songwriters and content creators who seek high-quality recording in a mobile format. Its features cater specifically to musicians, with a straightforward approach to recording. The MOTU M2, with its broader compatibility and bundled content, appeals to a wider range of users, including those interested in digital production across multiple platforms. This makes the MOTU a versatile choice for users who may also be involved in video content creation or require additional software.
Performance and Usability
In terms of performance, both interfaces offer 24-bit/192kHz recording quality, ensuring excellent sound fidelity. The Mackie’s zero-latency monitoring is particularly beneficial for musicians who need immediate feedback while recording. The MOTU M2 also features hardware monitoring, which enhances usability by allowing users to hear their inputs with minimal delay. However, the Mackie’s additional features tailored for musicians may make it slightly more user-friendly for those specifically focused on music production.
Price Comparison
At $54.95, the Mackie Audio Interface offers an attractive entry point for budget-conscious users, while the MOTU M2's price of $199.95 represents a substantial investment. This means the Mackie is about 73% less expensive than the MOTU. For individuals just starting or those who need a reliable interface without breaking the bank, the Mackie presents a compelling option. Conversely, the MOTU’s higher price may reflect its additional features and bundled content, justifying the cost for more experienced users seeking advanced capabilities.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Mackie Audio Interface and the MOTU M2 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're a musician or content creator seeking a budget-friendly option with robust features, the Mackie Audio Interface at $54.95 is a great choice. However, if you require advanced capabilities and additional software content, the MOTU M2 at $199.95 may be worth the investment. Consider your priorities, whether it be price, features, or connectivity, to determine which audio interface best suits your creative endeavors.

