Makita 5007F 7-1/4" Circular Saw vs Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw
Updated July 2026 — Makita 5007F 7-1/4" Circular Saw wins on weight, Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw wins on sales rank and price.
The Makita 5007F offers excellent value and performance for budget-conscious users, while the Metabo HPT excels in advanced features and portability.
Why Makita 5007F 7-1/4" Circular Saw is better
Price
Makita is significantly cheaper at $144.71 compared to Metabo's $466.65.
Sales Rank
Makita has a higher sales rank of 41,372, indicating better market acceptance.
Power
Makita's 15 AMP motor delivers 5,800 RPM for robust performance.
Why Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw is better
Cutting Depth
Metabo offers a cutting depth of over 2-1/2".
Portability
Metabo weighs only 9.7 lbs, making it easier to transport.
Warranty
Metabo provides a lifetime tool body warranty.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita 5007F 7-1/4" Circular Saw | Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | Brushed | Brushless |
| LED Lights | Yes | No |
| Battery Included | No | Yes |
| Dust Blower | Yes | No |
| Warranty | Not specified | Lifetime |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Makita 5007F is priced at $144.71, while the Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt costs $466.65. This makes the Makita about 69% cheaper than the Metabo, which is a significant price difference. For professionals or DIY enthusiasts on a budget, this price gap may heavily influence their purchasing decision. Despite the lower cost, the Makita 5007F offers features that can satisfy various cutting needs, making it a practical choice for those who require reliability without breaking the bank.
Power and Performance
When it comes to power, the Makita 5007F features a robust 15 AMP motor that delivers a speed of 5,800 RPM, ensuring high performance for various cutting tasks. In contrast, the Metabo HPT boasts a 36V brushless motor, designed to provide consistent power for tough cuts, which makes it ideal for more demanding projects. The Makita is built for durability and can handle a range of materials, while the Metabo emphasizes efficiency and versatility, offering best-in-class cutting per amp hour. Both tools are engineered for reliability, but their intended use cases may dictate the best choice for buyers.
Cutting Capacity
The cutting capacity of the Makita 5007F is impressive, allowing cuts of up to 2-3/8" at 90° and 1-3/4" at 45°. This makes it suitable for framing, siding, and flooring applications. On the other hand, the Metabo HPT offers a cutting depth of more than 2-1/2", alongside an adjustable bevel from -1 to 46°. This flexibility means the Metabo can perform a wider range of cuts, making it ideal for more intricate projects. While both saws excel in their cutting capabilities, the choice will depend on the specific requirements of the job at hand.
Design and Usability
The design of the Makita 5007F focuses on user-friendliness, featuring large, easy-to-read markings for depth and bevel adjustments. It is well-balanced for superior handling, which is crucial for extended use in various job site conditions. In comparison, the Metabo HPT weighs only 9.7 lbs, making it lightweight and portable. Its compact design ensures easy maneuverability, which is a significant advantage for users who frequently transport their tools. Both saws aim for ease of use, but the Metabo’s design caters more to those who prioritize portability.
Visibility and Cutting Precision
Visibility during cuts is enhanced in the Makita 5007F with its two built-in LED lights and a dust blower that clears the line of cut. This feature is vital for accuracy, especially in dimly lit work environments. The Metabo HPT also includes features that promote cutting precision, such as a blade window for improved sight lines and easy-to-read depth controls with a micro-adjustment dial. While both tools provide excellent visibility, the choice may come down to preference for built-in lighting versus the Metabo’s advanced depth control features.
Warranty and Support
The Makita 5007F does not explicitly detail a warranty in the available data, which may raise concerns for potential buyers. In contrast, the Metabo HPT offers a lifetime tool body warranty, a 2-year battery warranty, and a 1-year charger warranty, showcasing their commitment to customer satisfaction and product reliability. This level of support can be a deciding factor for those who value long-term investment in their tools. For buyers considering longevity and support, the Metabo HPT may present a more appealing option.
Sales Rank and Market Position
The Makita 5007F has a sales rank of 41,372, indicating its popularity among users and its established reputation in the market. This rank suggests that the saw is well-regarded for its performance and reliability in various applications. In comparison, the Metabo HPT has a sales rank of 186,476, which may indicate a less established presence in the market. While both tools have their strengths, the Makita's higher sales rank may reflect its better acceptance among a broader user base.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Makita 5007F and the Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt comes down to individual needs and preferences. If budget constraints are a priority, the Makita 5007F offers excellent performance at a significantly lower price, making it a suitable choice for general contractors and DIY enthusiasts alike. However, for those seeking advanced features, portability, and robust customer support, the Metabo HPT could be worth the investment despite its higher cost. Ultimately, the decision should align with the specific requirements of the projects you plan to undertake.

