Makita XMU04ZX 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless Grass vs YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer Cordless,
Updated July 2026 — Makita XMU04ZX 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless Grass wins on brand and cutting speed, YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer Cordless, wins on price and safety.
The Makita XMU04ZX offers superior cutting speed and brand reliability, while the YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer provides excellent value and runtime.
Why Makita XMU04ZX 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless Grass is better
Cutting Speed
Makita delivers 2,500 SPM compared to YDlawn's lower efficiency.
Brand Reputation
Makita is a well-established brand known for quality.
Weight
Makita is lighter at 4.1 lbs, making it easier to handle.
Why YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer Cordless, is better
Price
YDlawn is $69.99, significantly cheaper than Makita's $107.59.
Battery Included
YDlawn includes two 4.0Ah batteries, while Makita requires a separate purchase.
Safety Features
YDlawn has a dual-button safety start system for added safety.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita XMU04ZX 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Cordless Grass | YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer Cordless, |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 18V LXT 5.0Ah (not included) | 2x 4.0Ah included |
| Blade Length | 6-5/16 inches | 22 inches |
| SPM | 2500 | Not specified |
| Weight | 4.1 lbs | 5 lbs |
| Safety Features | Star Protection | Dual-button system |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer is significantly more affordable than the Makita XMU04ZX, making it about 35% cheaper at $69.99 compared to $107.59. This price difference could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers looking for reliable hedge trimming solutions. While both products offer quality features, the lower price of the YDlawn may appeal to those who want essential functionalities without breaking the bank. The Makita, on the other hand, is priced higher but is known for its robust build and brand reputation, which some users might find worth the investment.
Battery and Runtime
Battery performance is a key differentiator between the two products. The YDlawn includes two 4.0Ah lithium-ion batteries, providing up to 180 minutes of runtime, which is notable for users needing extended operation without interruptions. In contrast, the Makita XMU04ZX requires a separate purchase of the 18V LXT 5.0Ah battery and offers up to 200 minutes of run time, but users must consider the additional cost of the battery. The ability to use the same battery across a range of Makita tools is a potential advantage for those already invested in the Makita ecosystem.
Cutting Performance
When it comes to cutting performance, the Makita XMU04ZX boasts a high-speed motor delivering 2,500 strokes per minute, which enhances its cutting efficiency. The shear blade measures 6-5/16 inches, allowing for effective grass trimming and minor hedge work. The YDlawn, however, features a 22-inch dual-action blade that can cut through branches up to 3/4 inch thick, making it well-suited for more substantial shrubbery. This dual-action blade design reduces vibrations and ensures smooth cuts, which might be more appealing for users focusing on hedge trimming rather than just grass shearing.
Weight and Maneuverability
The YDlawn hedge trimmer is slightly heavier at 5 lbs compared to the Makita XMU04ZX, which weighs only 4.1 lbs (excluding the battery). The lighter weight of the Makita can lead to easier maneuverability and reduced arm fatigue during extended use. This might be an essential factor for users who prioritize ease of handling over the additional features offered by the YDlawn. Both products are designed for user comfort, but the ergonomic features of the YDlawn, including a wrap-around handle and soft grips, may provide additional comfort during operation.
Safety Features
Safety is a crucial aspect of any power tool, and both models offer distinct safety features. The YDlawn comes equipped with a dual-button safety start system to prevent accidental activation, along with a full-coverage hand guard. This ensures a maximum level of safety during operation. The Makita, while not explicitly detailing safety features, includes Star Protection technology, which safeguards against overloading, over-discharging, and overheating. Both models aim to enhance user safety, but the YDlawn’s explicit safety mechanisms might be more reassuring for first-time users or those new to hedge trimming.
Brand Reputation
Brand reputation plays a significant role in consumer purchasing decisions. Makita is recognized for its high-quality power tools and has a strong reputation in the industry, often reflected in its sales rank of 41,204. YDlawn, while newer and less established, has gained traction with a sales rank of 28,738, indicating a growing acceptance among consumers. For buyers who prioritize brand reliability, the established presence of Makita may justify its higher price point. Conversely, those willing to explore newer brands might find the YDlawn an attractive option, especially with its competitive pricing and solid features.
User Experience and Handling
User experience can significantly impact the overall satisfaction with a product. The Makita XMU04ZX is designed for quick blade changes and features a rubberized soft grip handle, enhancing operational comfort. On the other hand, the YDlawn offers a lightweight design that is friendly for beginners and elderly users, with its ergonomic wrap-around handle ensuring ease of use. Both products are aimed at providing a comfortable trimming experience, but users who prioritize lightweight tools for prolonged use may gravitate towards the YDlawn.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Makita XMU04ZX and the YDlawn 20V Hedge Trimmer ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for a power tool with superior cutting speed and brand reliability, the Makita XMU04ZX is an excellent choice, albeit at a higher price. However, if you want a more budget-friendly option with solid performance for general hedge trimming tasks, the YDlawn offers a compelling alternative with longer runtime and additional batteries included. Ultimately, your choice should align with how you plan to use the tool and the importance you place on brand reputation versus cost-effectiveness.

