Makita XSH03Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless vs Skil 5080-01 13-Amp 7-1/4" Circular Saw, Red
Updated July 2026 — Makita XSH03Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless wins on portability and power, Skil 5080-01 13-Amp 7-1/4" Circular Saw, Red wins on value and weight.
The Makita XSH03Z offers superior performance and advanced features, while the Skil 5080-01 is a budget-friendly option for basic tasks.
Why Makita XSH03Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless is better
Performance
Makita has a higher RPM and advanced motor technology.
Portability
Makita is cordless, enhancing mobility.
Durability
Makita's brushless motor ensures longer lifespan.
Why Skil 5080-01 13-Amp 7-1/4" Circular Saw, Red is better
Price
Skil is significantly cheaper at $44.
Weight
Skil has a 15% weight reduction for less user fatigue.
Sales Rank
Skil has a better sales rank at 3,230.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita XSH03Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless | Skil 5080-01 13-Amp 7-1/4" Circular Saw, Red |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | Brushless | Corded |
| Max RPM | 5000 | No Data |
| Bevel Angle | No Data | 51 degrees |
| Weight | Lightweight | Reduced |
| Price | $199.88 | $44.00 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Makita XSH03Z and Skil 5080-01
The Makita XSH03Z is a high-performance cordless circular saw, while the Skil 5080-01 is a powerful corded option. The Makita retails for $199.88, whereas the Skil is significantly cheaper at $44.00, making it about 78% less expensive. Despite the price difference, both saws have distinct advantages that cater to different user needs.
Power and Performance
The Makita XSH03Z features a powerful BL Motor that delivers up to 5,000 RPM, optimizing cutting speed and torque for various applications. This advanced motor technology allows for efficient energy use, extending battery run time by up to 50%. In contrast, the Skil 5080-01 comes equipped with a 13 Amp motor, providing solid performance for entry-level users. However, it lacks the advanced features of the Makita, making the latter a better choice for professional or demanding projects.
Design and Build Quality
Design-wise, the Makita XSH03Z boasts a lightweight, cordless design that enhances portability and ease of use. Its brushless motor ensures durability and reduces wear and tear. On the other hand, the Skil 5080-01 is also designed with user comfort in mind, featuring a 15% weight reduction compared to its predecessor, the SKIL 5380. While both tools are built for efficiency, the Makita’s premium build quality may appeal more to those seeking longevity in a tool.
Cutting Capability
When it comes to cutting capabilities, the Makita XSH03Z excels with its automatic speed change technology, which adjusts cutting speed and torque during operation. This feature allows for optimal performance in a variety of materials. The Skil 5080-01, while capable, offers a maximum bevel angle of 51 degrees, providing versatility for different cutting angles. However, it may not match the advanced speed control of the Makita, which is crucial for precise cuts.
User Experience
User experience varies significantly between the two saws. The Makita XSH03Z, being cordless, allows for greater freedom of movement without the hassle of cords. It is ideal for professionals who often work in different environments. The Skil 5080-01, although corded, includes an improved dust blower to keep the cutting line clear, enhancing visibility and precision. For casual users or those with a fixed workspace, the Skil offers a straightforward, effective solution.
Maintenance and Longevity
In terms of maintenance, the Makita XSH03Z benefits from its brushless motor, which eliminates carbon brushes and results in cooler, more efficient operation. This design contributes to a longer lifespan and reduced maintenance needs. The Skil 5080-01, while effective, may require more frequent maintenance due to its traditional motor design. Users looking for a tool with minimal maintenance may prefer the Makita.
Price and Value
The price difference between the two models is substantial, with the Makita XSH03Z priced at $199.88 and the Skil 5080-01 at $44.00. This makes the Skil about 78% cheaper, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. However, the Makita’s advanced features and performance may justify the higher cost for serious DIYers or professionals. Value can be subjective, depending on the intended use and frequency of the tool’s application.
Availability and Sales Rank
In terms of market performance, the Skil 5080-01 holds a better sales rank at 3,230, indicating its popularity among consumers. The Makita, with a sales rank of 38,486, may appeal more to niche markets. Availability may also differ, with the Skil likely more accessible due to its lower price point and broader consumer appeal, making it a more favorable choice for general users.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Makita XSH03Z and the Skil 5080-01 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize advanced features, portability, and long-term performance, the Makita is the superior choice despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly, effective tool for basic projects, the Skil 5080-01 offers great value at a significantly lower cost. Consider your usage frequency and project requirements to make the best decision.

