Makita XSH04ZB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact vs SKIL 2x20V PWR CORE 20 Brushless 7-1/4” Rear
Updated July 2026 — SKIL 2x20V PWR CORE 20 Brushless 7-1/4” Rear leads on rpm and length.
The Makita XSH04ZB is a more affordable and portable option, while the SKIL PWR CORE 20 offers superior cutting power and runtime.
Why Makita XSH04ZB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact is better
Price
Makita is $90 cheaper than SKIL
Weight
Makita weighs 6.4 lbs, lighter than SKIL
Compact Design
Makita is designed for portability
Why SKIL 2x20V PWR CORE 20 Brushless 7-1/4” Rear is better
Cutting Speed
SKIL operates at 5,300 RPM, faster than Makita
Cutting Depth
SKIL cuts up to 2-9/16 inches, deeper than Makita
Battery Life
SKIL offers up to 600 cuts per charge, more than Makita
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita XSH04ZB 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Sub-Compact | SKIL 2x20V PWR CORE 20 Brushless 7-1/4” Rear |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $189.00 | $279.00 |
| Sales Rank | 104961 | 149900 |
| Motor Type | Brushless | Digital Brushless |
| Runtime | 350 cuts | 600 cuts |
| Charging Time | N/A | 15 minutes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Makita XSH04ZB and SKIL PWR CORE 20
The Makita XSH04ZB is priced at $189.00, while the SKIL PWR CORE 20 costs $279.00, making the Makita about 32% cheaper than the SKIL. Both circular saws are designed for heavy-duty cutting tasks, but they cater to different user needs and preferences. The Makita is a sub-compact model ideal for portability, while the SKIL offers a more powerful option with its larger blade size and battery configuration.
Design and Ergonomics
In terms of design, the Makita XSH04ZB features a compact and ergonomic blade-right design, measuring only 10-5/8 inches in length. Weighing in at just 6.4 lbs (with a 2.0Ah battery, sold separately), it's tailored for comfort during extended use. Conversely, the SKIL PWR CORE 20 has a rear handle design that provides a 7-1/4 inch blade, designed for more substantial cuts. While the SKIL weighs more due to the larger battery and motor, it is engineered to tackle tougher materials effectively.
Cutting Performance
The Makita XSH04ZB delivers a maximum speed of 5,000 RPM, which is sufficient for most cutting and ripping applications. It has a cutting capacity of 2-1/4 inches at 90°, allowing it to handle standard framing tasks. On the other hand, the SKIL PWR CORE 20 boasts a slightly higher speed of 5,300 RPM and can cut through materials up to 2-9/16 inches deep in one pass. This performance advantage makes the SKIL more suitable for demanding jobs that require efficiency and speed.
Battery and Runtime
When it comes to battery performance, the Makita XSH04ZB operates on a single 18V battery, compatible with various amp-hour options, including 2.0Ah to 6.0Ah. While the runtime can extend significantly with higher-capacity batteries, the testing shows it can achieve up to 350 cross-cuts per charge using the 2.0Ah battery. The SKIL PWR CORE 20, however, utilizes two 5.0Ah batteries, offering up to 600 cuts per charge, which is a 71% improvement in cutting capacity per charge compared to the Makita. This makes the SKIL a better choice for users needing extended use without frequent recharging.
Additional Features
The Makita XSH04ZB includes features like dual LED lights for visibility, an electric brake, a built-in tether notch, and Extreme Protection Technology (XPT), enhancing its suitability for various job site conditions. The SKIL PWR CORE 20 also has impressive features, such as a digital brushless motor for intelligent power management, an adaptable dust port for improved cleanliness, and a fast-charging Dual Port PWR JUMP charger that can recharge batteries from 0-25% in just 15 minutes. Each saw brings unique features to the table, catering to different user needs.
Price and Value
The price difference between the two products is significant, with the Makita XSH04ZB retailing at $189.00, while the SKIL PWR CORE 20 costs $279.00. This represents a $90 difference, with the Makita being about 32% less expensive. While both models offer good value for their respective price points, the Makita may appeal more to budget-conscious consumers or those who prioritize portability and ease of use. In contrast, the SKIL, while pricier, delivers enhanced features and cutting capabilities that may justify its cost for professional users.
User Experience and Sales Rank
The Makita XSH04ZB has a sales rank of 104,961, indicating a decent level of popularity in the market. On the other hand, the SKIL PWR CORE 20 has a sales rank of 149,900, suggesting it may not be as widely adopted. User feedback often highlights the Makita's lightweight design and ease of use, making it a favorite among contractors who need reliable performance without the bulk. The SKIL, while powerful, may appeal more to those who prioritize performance over portability.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Makita XSH04ZB and the SKIL PWR CORE 20 ultimately comes down to your specific needs. If you value portability, a lighter weight, and a lower price point, the Makita XSH04ZB is a strong contender. However, if you need a more powerful saw capable of cutting through tougher materials with extended runtime, the SKIL PWR CORE 20 may be worth the extra investment. Both saws deliver quality performance, but your choice should align with the type of projects you plan to undertake.

