Makita XSH06PT 18V X2 LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless vs Milwaukee 2732-20 M18 Fuel 18 Volt Lithium-Ion 15 Amp 7-1/
Updated July 2026 — Makita XSH06PT 18V X2 LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless wins on sales rank and price, Milwaukee 2732-20 M18 Fuel 18 Volt Lithium-Ion 15 Amp 7-1/ wins on cuts/charge.
The Makita XSH06PT offers superior performance and advanced features, while the Milwaukee 2732-20 provides excellent value and runtime. Choose based on your specific needs and budget.
Why Makita XSH06PT 18V X2 LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless is better
Performance
Makita has a higher RPM at 6000.
Features
Makita includes automatic speed change technology.
Build Quality
Makita uses a die-cast magnesium base for lightweight durability.
Why Milwaukee 2732-20 M18 Fuel 18 Volt Lithium-Ion 15 Amp 7-1/ is better
Price
Milwaukee is approximately 32% cheaper.
Cuts per Charge
Milwaukee can make up to 750 cuts per charge.
User Experience
Milwaukee has a better sales rank indicating higher popularity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita XSH06PT 18V X2 LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless | Milwaukee 2732-20 M18 Fuel 18 Volt Lithium-Ion 15 Amp 7-1/ |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | Brushless | Brushless |
| Electric Brake | Yes | Yes |
| Dust Port | Yes | Yes |
| LED Light | No | Yes |
| Cutting Capacity | 2-11/16" | Not specified |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Makita XSH06PT is priced at $380.63, while the Milwaukee 2732-20 is available for $256.99, making the Milwaukee about 32% cheaper. This significant price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers looking for a powerful circular saw without breaking the bank. The Milwaukee tool offers a solid option for those who need reliability and performance without the premium that comes with the Makita's advanced features. The lower price point of the Milwaukee may appeal to contractors or DIY enthusiasts who prioritize cost-effectiveness in their tool investments.
Performance and Power
The Makita XSH06PT is designed to deliver maximum performance with a powerful brushless motor that reaches 6,000 RPM. In contrast, the Milwaukee 2732-20 boasts a POWERSTATE Brushless Motor that provides performance equivalent to a 15 Amp corded saw, allowing for up to 750 cuts per charge. This means that while the Makita excels in RPM, the Milwaukee offers more cutting versatility with a higher number of cuts per charge. This performance metric makes the Milwaukee a strong contender for those who prioritize runtime and efficiency in their cutting tasks.
Build Quality
Both the Makita XSH06PT and Milwaukee 2732-20 feature robust design elements aimed at enhancing durability. The Makita incorporates a die-cast magnesium base and blade guard, which contributes to its lightweight design at just 10.4 lbs. The Milwaukee, meanwhile, utilizes a magnesium shoe and guards for maximum durability, ensuring it can withstand rigorous job site conditions. While both tools are built to last, the Makita’s combination of lightweight materials and durable construction may provide an edge in portability and ease of use, especially for extended periods.
Features and Functionality
The Makita XSH06PT comes packed with features such as automatic speed change technology, which adjusts cutting speed and torque for optimum performance. It also has a built-in dust blower to keep the line of cut clear. On the other hand, the Milwaukee 2732-20 includes an LED light for increased accuracy and visibility, an integrated dust port, and an electric brake that stops the blade quickly after the trigger is released. While both saws offer unique functionalities, the Makita’s advanced speed adjustment technology appeals to users who need precision, while the Milwaukee’s LED light and dust management features enhance visibility and cleanliness during cutting tasks.
Battery and Runtime
The Makita XSH06PT operates on two 18V LXT Lithium-Ion batteries, delivering impressive runtime with up to 610 crosscuts per charge in 2x4 SPF lumber. In contrast, the Milwaukee 2732-20 is designed to deliver power and efficiency equivalent to a 15 Amp corded saw, with the ability to make up to 750 cuts per charge. The difference in battery configuration and runtime may make the Makita more suitable for users who require high performance on demanding cuts, while the Milwaukee’s extended cut capability can be a major advantage for those engaging in larger projects.
Weight and Portability
The Makita XSH06PT weighs only 10.4 lbs with batteries, making it a lightweight option for users who need to handle their tools for extended periods. The Milwaukee 2732-20's weight isn't specified but is also designed for portability and ease of handling. For professionals and DIYers alike, the Makita’s lighter design enhances maneuverability, particularly in tight spaces or when working overhead. This focus on weight could be a deciding factor for users prioritizing ease of transport across job sites.
User Experience
User experience can vary significantly between these two products. The Makita XSH06PT has a sales rank of 91,778, which indicates a solid market presence but suggests it may not be as popular as the Milwaukee, which has a better sales rank of 70,058. Users may find that the Milwaukee offers a more user-friendly experience, particularly with its integrated features like the rafter hook for easy storage and the LED light for visibility in low-light conditions. A higher sales rank can also suggest greater customer satisfaction and trust in the Milwaukee brand among professionals.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Makita XSH06PT and Milwaukee 2732-20 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. The Makita offers superior performance with its high RPM and advanced features, making it ideal for users who demand precision and power. However, it comes at a higher price point. The Milwaukee, being about 32% cheaper, provides excellent performance with a focus on runtime and ease of use, making it a great choice for those who prioritize cost-effectiveness and portability. Ultimately, both saws are exceptional tools, but your choice should reflect your cutting needs and budget constraints.

