Makita XSS02Z 18V LXT Lithium-Ion Cordless 6-1/2" vs SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw
Updated July 2026 — SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw leads on price and motor power.
The Makita XSS02Z is ideal for portability and light tasks, while the SKIL excels in heavy-duty performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Makita XSS02Z 18V LXT Lithium-Ion Cordless 6-1/2" is better
Price
Makita is significantly cheaper at $127.64.
Portability
Makita is cordless and easier to transport.
Weight
Makita weighs only 7.3 lbs.
Why SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw is better
Cutting Capacity
SKIL has a 6-1/4 inch cutting capacity.
Power
SKIL features a 15 AMP Dual-Field motor.
Durability
SKIL has a magnesium die-cast footplate.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Makita XSS02Z 18V LXT Lithium-Ion Cordless 6-1/2" | SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw |
|---|---|---|
| RPM | 3700 | N/A |
| Bevel Capacity | 0°-50° | N/A |
| Blade Size | 6-1/2" | 16-5/16" |
| Material | Aluminum | Magnesium |
| Sales Rank | 30063 | 52459 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Makita XSS02Z 18V LXT Lithium-Ion Cordless 6-1/2" Circular Saw and the SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw Circular Saw cater to different needs in the realm of power cutting tools. While the Makita is a compact cordless option ideal for portability, the SKIL offers a larger cutting capacity suited for heavy-duty tasks. These differences significantly influence their usage in various scenarios.
The Makita is priced at $127.64, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the SKIL, which is priced at $636.99, about 400% more. This notable price difference points to distinct target markets and applications for each saw.
Cutting Capacity and Performance
When it comes to cutting capacity, the SKIL leads with a remarkable 6-1/4 inch capacity, allowing for clean cuts through materials up to 6x thick. This makes it particularly suitable for heavy-duty jobs that require significant cutting power. In contrast, the Makita has a cutting capacity of 2-1/4 inches at 90 degrees, which, while adequate for many tasks, limits its use in more demanding applications.
The performance of both tools reflects their design intent. The Makita's high-torque motor delivers 3,700 RPM, ensuring swift and efficient cuts for lighter materials. On the other hand, the SKIL's 15 AMP Dual-Field motor is designed to keep the motor cooler during intense use, which enhances its longevity and performance during heavy-duty applications.
Construction and Durability
Construction quality is a strong point for both tools, but they use different materials to achieve durability. The SKIL features a magnesium die-cast footplate, which not only ensures accurate cuts but also contributes to a lightweight design. This robust construction makes the SKIL well-suited for tough job site conditions.
The Makita, while also durable, uses a precision machined aluminum base that provides smooth cutting and added resilience. Weighing in at only 7.3 lbs. with the battery (battery not included), this design minimizes operator fatigue, making it a great option for extended use in various environments.
User Comfort and Handling
User comfort is an essential factor for power tools, and both saws have features designed to enhance handling. The Makita includes a rubberized soft grip handle that increases comfort on the job, especially during prolonged use. This design consideration is particularly beneficial for users who need to maneuver the saw frequently.
Conversely, the SKIL’s lightweight magnesium construction contributes to its overall ease of handling, despite its larger size. The design aims to reduce user strain while providing the power required for more substantial cuts. Both tools are designed to be user-friendly, but they cater to different comfort needs based on their weights and dimensions.
Portability and Convenience
Portability is a critical aspect for professionals who frequently move between job sites. The Makita XSS02Z excels in this category due to its cordless nature, allowing for easy transport without the need for power outlets. This cordless design is particularly advantageous when working in remote locations or on small projects.
In contrast, the SKIL, being a worm drive saw, is generally less portable due to its size and the requirement for a power source. However, it compensates with its cutting capacity and power, making it more suitable for stationary setups where maximum performance is needed over portability.
Price and Value Proposition
The price difference between the Makita and SKIL is considerable, with the Makita priced at $127.64 and the SKIL at $636.99. This is a stark contrast of approximately $509.35, making the Makita about 80% cheaper. This significant price gap reflects their intended use cases; the Makita is a great choice for casual users and those needing a reliable saw for light to moderate tasks, while the SKIL targets professionals requiring robust performance for demanding jobs.
Given the strong sales rank of the Makita at 30,063 and the SKIL at 52,459, the Makita appears to resonate more with consumers, likely due to its affordability and versatility.
Target Audience
The intended user for each saw is markedly different. The Makita XSS02Z is aimed at DIY enthusiasts and professionals who need a reliable, portable saw for lighter cutting tasks. Its ease of use and less demanding power requirements make it ideal for smaller jobs and home improvement projects.
On the other hand, the SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw is designed for heavy-duty professionals who need to tackle large materials efficiently. Its substantial cutting capacity and powerful motor make it the go-to option for contractors and builders who require a saw capable of handling the toughest tasks.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Makita XSS02Z and the SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize portability, ease of use, and affordability for lighter tasks, the Makita is a clear winner. However, for those who require heavy-duty cutting capabilities and are willing to invest more for superior performance, the SKIL is the better choice. Each saw excels in its respective domain, so your decision should align with your intended use and budget.

