Maytag MVW5035MW vs Whirlpool 4.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer in White
Updated July 2026 — Maytag MVW5035MW wins on warranty and price, Whirlpool 4.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer in White wins on efficiency and noise.
The Maytag MVW5035MW offers better stain-fighting capabilities and a lower price, while the Whirlpool excels in energy efficiency and quiet operation.
Why Maytag MVW5035MW is better
Price
Maytag is $20 cheaper than Whirlpool.
Stain Removal
Maytag has Extra Power for enhanced stain fighting.
Warranty
Maytag offers a 10-year limited parts warranty.
Why Whirlpool 4.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer in White is better
Energy Efficiency
Whirlpool is ENERGY STAR certified.
Cycle Variety
Whirlpool has 12 wash cycles compared to Maytag's 11.
Noise Level
Whirlpool's front-load design typically operates quieter.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Maytag MVW5035MW | Whirlpool 4.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer in White |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $481.99 | $501.99 |
| Capacity | 4.5 cu ft | 4.5 cu ft |
| Wash Cycles | 11 | 12 |
| Stain Fighting | Yes | No |
| Energy Star | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing the prices of the Maytag MVW5035MW and the Whirlpool 4.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer, the Maytag comes in cheaper at $481.99, making it about 4% less expensive than the Whirlpool, which is priced at $501.99. This price difference can be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for a reliable washing machine. Additionally, over the last 90 days, the average price of the Maytag has been $695.00, indicating a notable drop which could suggest a good opportunity for buyers. The Whirlpool's average price during the same period was $626.11, suggesting that while both brands have fluctuated in price, the Maytag offers a more attractive option at present.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Maytag MVW5035MW features a top-load configuration, while the Whirlpool has a front-load design. The top-load design of the Maytag may appeal to those who prefer easy access without bending down, while the front-load design of the Whirlpool can save space and often offers better energy efficiency. The Maytag is built with a robust, durable design that includes a 10-year limited parts warranty on the drive motor and stainless steel wash basket, indicating a high confidence in durability. Conversely, the Whirlpool’s construction is also focused on reliability, featuring a Tumble Fresh Option that keeps clothes fresh by periodically tumbling them for up to 12 hours after washing. Each design has its advantages tailored to different user preferences.
Washing Capacity
Both washing machines boast a capacity of 4.5 cu. ft., accommodating large loads of laundry. This size allows the Maytag to wash approximately 17-18 towels in one cycle, which is ideal for larger families or anyone with substantial laundry needs. The Whirlpool also supports a full 10-lb load, making it efficient for various laundry tasks. This equivalence in capacity means that either washer can handle sizeable laundry loads effectively, allowing users to save time by washing more items in fewer cycles.
Washing Performance
The Maytag MVW5035MW excels in washing performance with features like the Extra Power option, which enhances stain-fighting capabilities across any wash cycle. This feature provides intense pre-wash and extra agitation, ensuring that stubborn stains receive more cleaning action. The Power Agitator with 360° wash action also contributes to its effectiveness by keeping laundry moving throughout the cycle. In comparison, the Whirlpool focuses on convenience with its Tumble Fresh Option, which keeps clothes fresh after washing. However, it does not emphasize stain removal features in the same way as the Maytag. Overall, for those prioritizing stain removal, the Maytag may offer a superior washing performance.
Cycle Options
The Maytag MVW5035MW comes with 11 wash cycles, including a Quick Wash cycle that cleans lightly soiled loads in about 30 minutes. It also offers an Auto Sensing feature that adjusts water levels based on load size, enhancing efficiency. On the other hand, the Whirlpool provides 12 different cycles, including a Quick Wash Cycle that can tackle a full 10-lb load in just 25 minutes. While both machines offer quick wash options, the Whirlpool provides slightly more variety in cycle selections, which could be beneficial for users with diverse laundry needs.
Energy Efficiency
The Whirlpool washer is ENERGY STAR certified, indicating that it meets strict energy efficiency guidelines set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This certification can lead to lower utility bills over time, making it an appealing choice for environmentally conscious consumers. While the Maytag does not have an ENERGY STAR certification mentioned, its design focuses on effective cleaning and water efficiency through features like Auto Sensing. However, without explicit energy efficiency ratings, potential buyers may lean toward the Whirlpool for its recognized energy-saving attributes.
Noise Level
Noise levels can be an important consideration for many consumers, especially in homes where the laundry area is near living spaces. The Maytag MVW5035MW does not specifically mention any noise reduction features, but its top-load design typically operates quietly. The Whirlpool, being a front-loader, is generally known for quieter operation due to its design that minimizes vibrations. Users sensitive to noise may find the front-load configuration of the Whirlpool more suitable, although both machines are constructed to operate efficiently without excessive noise.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Maytag MVW5035MW and the Whirlpool 4.5 Cu. Ft. Front Load Washer ultimately depends on your specific laundry needs and preferences. If price is a primary factor, the Maytag is the cheaper option at $481.99, offering enhanced stain-fighting capabilities and a robust design. However, if you prioritize energy efficiency and quieter operation, the Whirlpool, though slightly more expensive at $501.99, may be the better choice due to its ENERGY STAR certification and additional cycle options. Both washers deliver solid performance, but the right decision will depend on whether you value cost savings or features like energy efficiency and quietness more.

