Meike vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Meike wins on aperture and weight, VILTROX wins on price and focal length.
The VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E offers superior autofocus and versatility, making it the better choice for most photographers. However, the Meike 25mm F1.8 is a solid option for those on a budget.
Why Meike is better
Price
Meike is significantly cheaper at $74.99.
Weight
Meike is lighter, making it more portable.
Manual Control
Meike offers manual focus for enthusiasts.
Why VILTROX is better
Autofocus
VILTROX features fast and precise autofocus.
Aperture
VILTROX has a larger maximum aperture for low-light.
Optical Design
VILTROX has more elements for better image quality.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Meike | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Focus Type | Manual | Autofocus |
| Compatibility | M43 | Sony E |
| Bokeh | Good | Excellent |
| Build Quality | Metal | Metal |
| Low Light | Good | Excellent |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Meike 25mm F1.8 and VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E
The Meike 25mm F1.8 is priced at $74.99, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E commands a higher price of $179.00, making it about 17% more expensive. Both lenses cater to different photography styles and preferences, but their specifications and features vary significantly. The Meike lens is designed for Micro Four Thirds cameras, offering a wide aperture suitable for close-up and portrait photography. In contrast, the VILTROX lens is compatible with Sony E-mount cameras, featuring a fast autofocus system and a versatile focal length aimed at a broader range of photographic applications.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of build quality, the Meike 25mm F1.8 features a lightweight, metal body that emphasizes portability, which is essential for on-the-go photographers. Its construction includes 7 elements in 5 groups, ensuring a durable design. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E also boasts a robust metal body but weighs slightly more at 170g. It comprises 11 elements in 9 groups, which includes specialized elements to minimize optical aberrations. Both lenses are designed for long-lasting performance, but the VILTROX has additional features like an extended lens hood and a USB-C upgrade port, enhancing its usability and functionality.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
When it comes to aperture, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E has a maximum aperture of f/1.7, compared to the Meike's f/1.8. This slight difference means that the VILTROX can capture a bit more light, which can be advantageous for low-light photography. Both lenses deliver excellent bokeh, but the VILTROX's larger aperture facilitates a smoother background blur. Therefore, photographers looking for optimal low-light performance may prefer the VILTROX, despite the Meike lens still providing good capabilities in this area.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Meike 25mm F1.8 offers a fixed focal length of 25mm, translating to a full-frame equivalent of approximately 50mm, which is ideal for portrait and close-up photography. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E provides a focal length of 35mm, equivalent to about 52.5mm on full-frame cameras. This makes the VILTROX lens incredibly versatile for various photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. As such, if you require a lens that can handle a broader range of situations, the VILTROX may be the better choice.
Autofocus vs. Manual Focus
A significant difference between the two lenses lies in their focus systems. The Meike 25mm F1.8 is a manual focus lens, which requires users to activate "M mode" or the "Release without lens" setting on their camera. This can be a limitation for photographers who prefer quicker shooting and less manual adjustment. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E features fast autofocus powered by a new STM motor, delivering precise and near-silent focusing capabilities. This advantage makes the VILTROX particularly suited for dynamic shooting environments, such as street photography or video recording.
Optical Performance
Both lenses promise excellent optical quality, but the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E stands out with its optimized optical design, consisting of 11 elements in 9 groups, including special elements that reduce chromatic aberrations and distortion. In comparison, the Meike 25mm F1.8 has 7 elements in 5 groups, which may not match the VILTROX in terms of overall image quality. For photographers who prioritize clarity and image fidelity, the VILTROX lens is likely to deliver superior performance.
Target Audience
The target audience for each lens differs due to their specifications and features. The Meike 25mm F1.8 is ideal for enthusiasts and photographers who enjoy manual control and are using Micro Four Thirds systems. Its affordability makes it an attractive option for those on a budget. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E is designed for professional and semi-professional photographers who require fast autofocus and versatile performance across various shooting conditions. Its higher price reflects its advanced features and capabilities.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Meike 25mm F1.8 and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E ultimately depends on your specific needs and the type of photography you engage in. If you are looking for an affordable, lightweight lens for Micro Four Thirds systems and are comfortable with manual focus, the Meike 25mm F1.8 is a compelling choice at $74.99. However, if you require faster autofocus, better low-light performance, and a more versatile focal length for Sony E-mount cameras, the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 E at $179.00 offers advanced features that justify its higher price.

