vsversusfinder

Meike vs Tamron 17-

Updated July 2026 — Meike wins on weight and aperture, Tamron 17- wins on versatility and build.

The Meike 50mm F1.8 offers exceptional value for Nikon users focused on portrait photography, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 provides versatility and advanced features for Sony users.

Why Meike is better

Price

Meike is significantly cheaper at $159.99.

Aperture

Meike has a larger aperture of F1.8 for better low light performance.

Weight

Meike is more compact and lightweight.

Why Tamron 17- is better

Versatility

Tamron's 4.1x zoom range is more versatile.

Build Quality

Tamron features moisture-resistant construction.

Optical Design

Tamron has a more advanced optical design with 16 elements.

Overall score

Meike
75
Tamron 17-
85

Specifications

SpecMeikeTamron 17-
Focal Length50mm17-70mm
Max ApertureF1.8F2.8
Mount TypeNikon ZSony E
Weight0.5 lbs1.5 lbs
Zoom RatioFixed4.1x

Dimension comparison

MeikeTamron 17-

Overview of the Meike 50mm F1.8 and Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8

The Meike 50mm F1.8 is priced at $159.99, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is significantly higher at $599.00. This represents a price difference of about 273%. Both lenses cater to different photography needs and camera systems, with the Meike designed for Nikon Z mount cameras and the Tamron for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras. This article will explore various aspects of each lens to help you determine which might be the better option for your photography.

Compatibility and Use Cases

The Meike 50mm F1.8 is specifically designed for Nikon Z mount cameras such as the Z50, Z6, and Z9, making it an excellent choice for Nikon users looking to enhance their portrait photography skills. On the other hand, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is tailored for Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras, offering versatility with its 4.1x zoom ratio, suitable for a wide range of photography styles from landscapes to street photography. If you own a Nikon camera, the Meike lens is your go-to choice, whereas Sony users will find the Tamron lens more compatible with their gear.

Aperture and Low Light Performance

The Meike 50mm features a large aperture of F1.8, which is advantageous for shooting in low light conditions and allows for faster shutter speeds. This aperture helps create a shallow depth of field, ideal for isolating subjects and producing beautiful bokeh, particularly effective in portrait photography. Conversely, the Tamron 17-70mm maintains a constant maximum aperture of F2.8 throughout its zoom range, which is also suitable for low light but not as effective as the Meike's larger aperture. Therefore, if low light performance and bokeh are your priorities, the Meike lens stands out.

Optical Design and Image Quality

The Meike 50mm incorporates a design with 7 groups and 11 elements, including low-dispersion glass to reduce chromatic aberration and ghosting. This contributes to high-resolution images and authentic color rendering. In contrast, the Tamron lens is built with 16 elements in 12 groups and features advanced optics, including two Glass Molded Aspherical elements and one hybrid aspherical lens. This design enhances its optical performance, making it versatile for various shooting scenarios. While both lenses offer excellent image quality, the Tamron's sophisticated optical design might appeal more to photographers looking for superior performance across a broader range of focal lengths.

Autofocus and Ease of Use

The Meike 50mm includes support for autofocus, electronic aperture adjustment, and a dedicated AF/MF focus mode switch, allowing for quick and convenient operation. This makes it user-friendly, especially for those new to photography. The Tamron 17-70mm also excels in this area, featuring Fast Hybrid AF and Eye AF compatibility with Sony cameras, which significantly enhances focusing precision. Both lenses provide excellent autofocus capabilities, but the Tamron's advanced features may give it an edge in fast-paced shooting environments.

Build Quality and Durability

When it comes to build quality, the Meike 50mm is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry for outdoor shoots. However, it lacks moisture resistance. In contrast, the Tamron 17-70mm is designed with moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, providing additional protection against the elements. This makes it a more robust option for photographers who often work in challenging weather conditions. If durability is a key concern for you, the Tamron lens is the better choice.

Price and Value for Money

At $159.99, the Meike 50mm offers exceptional value for Nikon users, especially considering its capabilities in portrait photography. In comparison, the Tamron 17-70mm is priced at $599.00, which makes it about 273% more expensive. While the higher price reflects its advanced zoom functionality and versatility, potential buyers must consider if those features justify the cost. For those on a budget or primarily shooting portraits, the Meike lens presents a more attractive option.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Meike 50mm F1.8 and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 ultimately depends on your specific needs and camera system. If you are a Nikon Z camera user looking for an affordable and high-quality lens for portraits, the Meike 50mm is an excellent choice. However, if you own a Sony APS-C camera and require versatility with a zoom lens for various photography styles, the Tamron 17-70mm justifies its higher price with advanced features and build quality. Assess your priorities, and make a choice that aligns with your photographic goals.