Meike vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Meike wins on price, VILTROX wins on weight and autofocus.
The Meike 50mm F1.8 offers a more budget-friendly option with solid performance, while the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 excels in advanced autofocus and low-light capabilities.
Why Meike is better
Lower Price
Meike is $19.01 cheaper than VILTROX.
Portrait Focus
Meike is ideal for portrait photography.
Simplicity
Meike has a straightforward design.
Why VILTROX is better
Better Aperture
VILTROX has a wider aperture of F1.7.
Advanced Autofocus
VILTROX features eye and face autofocus.
Lightweight
VILTROX weighs only 170 grams.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Meike | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 50mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | F1.8 | F1.7 |
| Lens Elements | 11 in 7 | 11 in 9 |
| Autofocus Type | STM | STM |
| Compatible Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Meike 50mm F1.8 and VILTROX 35mm F1.7
The Meike 50mm F1.8 is priced at $159.99, while the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is available for $179.00, making the Meike lens about 11% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different camera mounts, with the Meike designed for Nikon Z mount cameras and the VILTROX compatible with Sony E-mount cameras. This price difference may influence buyers looking for a budget-friendly option without compromising on quality.
Aperture and Low Light Performance
The Meike 50mm F1.8 features a large aperture of F1.8, while the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 offers an even larger aperture of F1.7. This difference grants the VILTROX a slight edge in low-light conditions, allowing for brighter images and improved subject isolation due to its ability to create a beautiful bokeh effect. Both lenses are engineered with multiple aperture blades, with the Meike using 9 blades, which contributes to its pleasing background blur, essential for portrait photography.
Autofocus Capabilities
The autofocus system is a critical feature for photographers, and both lenses utilize STM (Stepping Motor) technology for effective focusing. The Meike lens supports electronic aperture adjustment and includes a dedicated AF/MF focus mode switch for better control. In contrast, the VILTROX lens incorporates advanced tracking features, including eye and face autofocus, enhancing its reliability during fast-paced shooting. This differentiation may appeal to users who prioritize quick and accurate focusing, particularly in dynamic environments.
Optical Design
In terms of optical construction, the Meike 50mm F1.8 has a design of 7 groups and 11 elements, which includes low-dispersion glass to minimize chromatic aberration and ghosting. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 boasts a more complex structure with 11 elements in 9 groups, including one ED lens and two high refractive index lenses. This advanced optical design allows the VILTROX to achieve superior color rendering and sharpness, making it a formidable choice for both amateur and professional photographers.
Portability and Weight
The VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is designed to be lightweight, weighing in at just 170 grams, making it an excellent choice for photographers on the go. This compactness facilitates spontaneous shooting opportunities, whether in urban settings or natural landscapes. While the weight of the Meike 50mm F1.8 is not specified, its larger size compared to the VILTROX may make it less convenient for extended outdoor photography sessions. Portability could be a deciding factor for those who value ease of transport.
Price Comparison
The Meike 50mm F1.8 is available at $159.99, compared to the VILTROX 35mm F1.7, which costs $179.00. This indicates a price difference of about $19.01, or roughly 11%. For budget-conscious buyers, the Meike lens provides an attractive option without sacrificing essential features, while the VILTROX lens offers advanced capabilities that may justify its higher price for some users.
Ideal Use Cases
The Meike 50mm F1.8 is particularly well-suited for portrait, street, architecture, and landscape photography. Its large aperture and excellent close-up performance make it an ideal choice for those looking to isolate subjects with a pleasing bokeh. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 is equally versatile, boasting a design that enhances its effectiveness in various shooting scenarios. Its advanced autofocus features and lightweight design may appeal to photographers who often shoot in fast-paced environments or require quick subject tracking.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Meike 50mm F1.8 and the VILTROX 35mm F1.7 hinges on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly lens that excels in portrait photography, the Meike is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize advanced autofocus capabilities and a slightly wider aperture for low-light shooting, the VILTROX may be worth the extra investment. Assessing your primary shooting style and camera compatibility will guide you to the best decision for your photography needs.

