Meike vs Nikon NIKKOR Z

Overview of the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II and Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S

The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II is priced at $229.99, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S retails for $566.95. This makes the Meike lens about 60% cheaper than its Nikon counterpart. Both lenses aim to deliver high-quality photography, but they cater to different camera systems and preferences.

Build Quality and Design

The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II is designed for Canon EF Mount cameras, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S is tailored for Z series mirrorless cameras. The Nikon lens features a compact and lightweight design, which is crucial for photographers seeking portability. In contrast, Meike’s lens is built to support a variety of Canon DSLR models but doesn't emphasize a lightweight design. This difference may influence users based on their camera system and preference for weight and portability.

Optical Performance

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S excels in optical performance, boasting extreme sharpness and virtually zero distortion, even when shot wide open. This is a significant advantage for photographers who require precision and clarity in their images. On the other hand, the Meike 85mm lens offers a wide f/1.8 aperture and an angle of view that is beneficial for portrait and architectural photography. While it provides good quality, it may not match the optical prowess of the Nikon lens, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

Focus Mechanism

The focusing mechanism differs notably between the two lenses. The Meike 85mm features an STM stepping motor, which ensures silent and smooth autofocus, making it suitable for both video and still photography. Conversely, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm also utilizes a new ultra-quiet stepping motor, ensuring silent operation, but it further enhances this with 5-Axis Dual Detect Optical VR technology for improved stabilization. This gives Nikon an edge, especially for handheld shooting in low-light situations.

Aperture and Bokeh

When it comes to aperture and bokeh quality, the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II offers 11 diaphragm blades, creating beautiful bokeh effects ideal for portraiture. The wide f/1.8 aperture allows for a shallow depth of field, which can enhance the visual appeal of photographs. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S also delivers beautiful bokeh, with its large aperture enhancing low-light performance. However, it doesn't explicitly state diaphragm blade count. Both lenses cater to photographers who appreciate aesthetically pleasing backgrounds in their shots.

Compatibility

Compatibility is a strong selling point for both lenses. The Meike 85mm is compatible with a wide range of Canon EF Mount cameras, including models like the 5D, 6D, and various Rebel series. This versatility makes it a solid choice for Canon users. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm is designed specifically for Z series mirrorless cameras, but it can also be used with F mount NIKKOR lenses via the FTZ Mount Adapter. This adaptability enhances its usability for Nikon users, particularly those transitioning from DSLR to mirrorless systems.

Price Comparison

There is a significant price difference between the two lenses. The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II is priced at $229.99, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious photographers. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S costs $566.95, which is about 148% more expensive than the Meike lens. This price disparity reflects the differing target markets for each lens, with Nikon positioning itself as a premium option, while Meike offers a more budget-friendly solution.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S depends on your specific needs and camera system. If you're a Canon user looking for an affordable, high-quality portrait lens, the Meike is an excellent option at $229.99. However, if you own a Nikon Z mirrorless camera and prioritize optical performance, silent focusing, and low-light capabilities, the Nikon lens, despite its higher price of $566.95, may be worth the investment. Ultimately, your choice should align with your photography style and the system you use.