Meike vs Sigma 17-
Updated July 2026 — Meike wins on focal length, Sigma 17- wins on price and weight.
The Meike 85mm offers excellent value for portrait photography, while the Sigma 17-40mm provides versatility for various shooting scenarios.
Why Meike is better
Price
Meike is significantly cheaper at $229.99.
Bokeh
Meike's 11 diaphragm blades enhance bokeh quality.
Portability
Meike's compact design is ideal for travel.
Why Sigma 17- is better
Versatility
Sigma's zoom range accommodates various photography styles.
Optics
Sigma's Art-series optics deliver superior image quality.
Low-light
Sigma's constant F1.8 aperture is beneficial for low-light conditions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Meike | Sigma 17- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | F1.8 | F1.8 |
| Focal Length | 85mm | 17-40mm |
| Weight | Light | Medium |
| Focus Type | STM | Standard |
| Image Quality | High | Professional |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Lenses
When it comes to selecting the right lens for your photography needs, understanding the differences between products is crucial. The Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II STM AF and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC are two compelling options for Sony E-mount users, each catering to distinct photographic styles and requirements. The Meike lens is priced at $229.99, while the Sigma lens comes in at a significantly higher $919.00, making the Meike lens about 75% cheaper than its counterpart.
Design and Build Quality
The design and build quality of a lens can greatly influence its usability and durability. The Meike 85mm F1.8 features a compact and lightweight build, making it ideal for portrait photographers who value portability. Its multi-coated lens elements reduce flare and ghosting, enhancing light transmission and color reproduction. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 boasts Art-series optics, which are highly regarded for their sharp detail and professional image quality. While both lenses are designed for Sony E-mount cameras, the Meike lens focuses on a standard focal length ideal for portraiture, whereas the Sigma offers versatility in a zoom format, suitable for a range of photography styles.
Aperture and Light Performance
Light performance is a key factor for photographers, especially in low-light conditions. The Meike 85mm has a large aperture of F1.8, which allows for beautiful bokeh effects and is particularly effective for portrait photography. This lens has 11 diaphragm blades, enhancing the quality of out-of-focus areas. The Sigma 17-40mm also features a constant F1.8 aperture, providing excellent low-light performance and creative depth effects. However, the versatility of the Sigma's zoom range makes it an appealing option for shooters who want to capture a variety of subjects in different lighting situations.
Focal Length and Versatility
The focal length of a lens determines its field of view and application. The Meike 85mm is specifically designed for portrait, architectural, and landscape photography, offering a standard focal length that excels in isolating subjects with a creamy background blur. On the other hand, the Sigma 17-40mm provides a range of focal lengths from wide-angle to short telephoto, making it suitable for portraits, travel, and video. This versatility can be a significant advantage for photographers who prefer to have one lens that can do it all, whereas the Meike lens is more specialized.
Autofocus and Usability
Autofocus capabilities are essential for capturing sharp images quickly. The Meike 85mm is equipped with an STM stepping motor, which offers silent and smooth focusing, a feature beneficial for both still photography and video. It also supports electronic aperture adjustment and EXIF information transmission. The Sigma 17-40mm is designed for ease of use, particularly with Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, ensuring that users can quickly adapt to various shooting scenarios. However, specific autofocus performance comparisons are not available, making it difficult to declare one superior to the other in this regard.
Price and Value Proposition
Price is often a decisive factor in choosing a lens. The Meike 85mm is currently priced at $229.99, while the Sigma 17-40mm is significantly higher at $919.00, which is about 75% more expensive. Given that both lenses offer unique features, the Meike lens presents a compelling value proposition for those focused on portrait photography who wish to maintain a budget. The Sigma lens, while pricier, may justify its cost with its additional versatility and quality associated with the Art-series designation.
Target Audience
Understanding the target audience for each lens can help buyers make informed decisions. The Meike 85mm is ideal for portrait photographers who prioritize image quality and beautiful bokeh without a hefty investment. It appeals to those looking for a high-resolution lens for specific photography styles. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm caters to a broader audience, including travelers and videographers who need flexibility in their focal lengths and the ability to shoot in diverse conditions. The price point reflects these different target markets, with the Sigma aimed at more professional users who require versatility.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC depends on your specific photography needs. If you are primarily focused on portraiture and are looking for a budget-friendly option with excellent image quality, the Meike lens is a stellar choice. However, if you require a more versatile lens that can handle a variety of situations, the Sigma lens may be worth the investment for its broader focal range and professional-grade optics. Each lens has its strengths, making it essential to weigh your priorities before making a decision.

