vsversusfinder

Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear Handle vs SKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact

Updated July 2026 — Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear Handle wins on cuts per charge and bevel capacity, SKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact wins on rpm.

The Metabo HPT offers superior power and cutting capacity, making it ideal for professional use, while the SKIL is a budget-friendly option for lighter tasks.

Why Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear Handle is better

Power

Metabo HPT has a higher cutting capacity.

Runtime

Metabo HPT can achieve 500 cuts per charge.

Weight

Metabo HPT is lighter than competitors.

Why SKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact is better

Price

SKIL is significantly more affordable.

Compact Design

SKIL is designed for easier handling.

Battery Life

SKIL's battery technology offers longer runtime.

Overall score

Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear Handle
85
SKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact
70

Specifications

SpecMetabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear HandleSKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact
Motor TypeBrushlessBrushless
Electric BrakeYesYes
WarrantyLifetime2 Years
Storage HookYesNo
Included Battery4.0Ah2.0Ah

Dimension comparison

Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear HandleSKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact

Price Comparison

When comparing prices, the SKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact Circular Saw Kit is significantly more affordable than the Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear Handle Circular Saw. The SKIL saw retails at $79.00, while the Metabo HPT saw is priced at $199.97, making it about 62% more expensive. This price difference could be a deciding factor for those on a budget or casual users who may not require the advanced features of the Metabo HPT model.

Power and Performance

In terms of power, the SKIL saw edges out the Metabo HPT with a brushless motor that can reach up to 5,500 RPM compared to the Metabo's 5,100 RPM. This slight advantage may translate to faster cutting speeds, especially for softer woods like pine. However, the Metabo HPT is designed for heavy-duty tasks, claiming it can achieve up to 500 cuts of 2x4 per charge. While both models are powerful, the choice may depend on the types of materials you plan to work with.

Cutting Capacity

The Metabo HPT offers a larger cutting capacity with its 7-1/4" blade, allowing it to effortlessly cut through multiple layers of plywood or OSB, handling up to 5 layers of 1/2” and 4 layers of 5/8”. In contrast, the SKIL saw, with its 6-1/2" blade, is designed for lighter cuts, including 105 cuts in 2x4 pine on a single charge. If your projects demand versatility in cutting thicker materials, the Metabo HPT is the more suitable option.

Weight and Design

The Metabo HPT is lauded for being lightweight, weighing only 8.2 lbs, which is 2 lbs lighter than its competitors in the same class. This can enhance maneuverability and reduce fatigue during long cutting sessions. On the other hand, the SKIL saw, while compact, does not specify its weight but is designed to be ergonomic and easy to handle. For users prioritizing ease of use, the Metabo HPT's lightweight design could be a significant advantage.

Battery and Runtime

The SKIL model includes a PWR CORE 20 2.0Ah lithium battery, which is designed to provide 25% longer runtime and twice the battery life due to its unique cooling technology. The Metabo HPT's 36V MultiVolt system allows for extensive cutting capabilities, achieving up to 500 cuts on a single charge. However, it does not specify the battery size, making it difficult to compare runtime directly. If prolonged battery life is crucial for your tasks, the SKIL's innovative battery technology may appeal more.

Safety Features

Both saws prioritize user safety, but they implement different features. The SKIL saw includes an electric brake that stops the blade quickly, enhancing safety during operation. Similarly, the Metabo HPT features an electric brake for quick stops, along with a 53° bevel capacity for precise cuts. While both models provide essential safety features, the SKIL’s additional focus on visibility with an LED shadow line may be beneficial for users cutting in dim environments.

Versatility and Applications

The Metabo HPT is designed for heavy-duty applications and is built to handle a variety of cutting tasks, including professional work and tougher materials. Its rafter hook for easy storage and magnesium base for durability add to its professional-grade appeal. In contrast, the SKIL saw is marketed more towards DIY enthusiasts and lighter projects, providing all necessary components for wood cutting. If you need a tool for rigorous professional tasks, the Metabo HPT might be the better choice, while the SKIL is suited for casual users.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Metabo HPT 36V Cordless 7-1/4" Rear Handle Circular Saw and the SKIL 20V Brushless 6-1/2In. Cordless Compact Circular Saw Kit ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. The Metabo HPT excels in power, cutting capacity, and is built for professional-grade tasks, albeit at a higher price. Conversely, the SKIL offers an attractive price point and solid performance for lighter, DIY projects. If you are seeking a premium saw for extensive cutting tasks, the Metabo HPT is worth the investment. However, if your needs are more casual or budget-conscious, the SKIL presents an excellent, cost-effective option.