vsversusfinder

Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/

Updated July 2026 — Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw wins on price and power, Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/ wins on speed and cut depth.

The Metabo HPT offers superior cutting capabilities and a comprehensive kit, while the Milwaukee provides a cost-effective solution for general tasks.

Why Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw is better

Cutting Depth

Metabo HPT has a cutting depth of over 2-1/2 inches.

Warranty

Metabo HPT offers a lifetime warranty on the tool body.

Features

Metabo HPT includes an adjustable bevel and a complete kit.

Why Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/ is better

Price

Milwaukee is significantly cheaper at $214.99.

Weight

Milwaukee is designed to be ergonomic and compact.

Versatility

Milwaukee is optimized for various job site tasks.

Overall score

Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw
85
Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/
72

Specifications

SpecMetabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track SawMilwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/
Motor TypeBrushlessBrushless
Battery4.0Ah MultiVoltM18 REDLITHIUM
Bevel Adjustment-1 to 46°Not specified
Dust Port360° swivelingNot specified
Cuts Per ChargeNot specified750

Dimension comparison

Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track SawMilwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/

Overview of the Metabo HPT and Milwaukee Circular Saws

The Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw Kit is significantly more expensive than the Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/4 Inch Circular Saw. Priced at $466.65, it stands in stark contrast to the Milwaukee saw, which retails for $214.99—about 54% cheaper. This price difference reflects the unique features and target user base of each saw, with the Metabo HPT focusing on advanced cutting capabilities suitable for professional woodworking, while the Milwaukee offers robust performance for general contractors.

Power and Performance

The Metabo HPT track saw is engineered for superior power and performance, featuring a brushless motor that delivers consistent power for demanding cuts. It boasts best-in-class cutting per amp hour through its 36V MultiVolt battery, making it ideal for tough woodworking tasks. On the other hand, the Milwaukee saw utilizes a POWERSTATE Brushless Motor that can reach 6,000 RPM, ensuring high speed even under load. This allows it to handle demanding applications efficiently. While both tools excel in performance, the Metabo HPT is specifically designed for intricate woodwork, whereas the Milwaukee is optimized for versatility across various job site tasks.

Cutting Capacity

In terms of cutting capacity, the Metabo HPT offers an impressive cutting depth of over 2-1/2", allowing users to tackle thick materials with ease. This feature is especially beneficial for those engaged in heavy-duty woodworking. Conversely, the Milwaukee saw has a cut capacity of 2-5/8", enabling it to cut through three times the material in one pass. While both saws provide substantial cutting capabilities, the Metabo HPT edges out with its deeper cut, making it more suitable for specialized woodworking projects.

Weight and Portability

Portability is a crucial factor for any contractor or DIY enthusiast. The Metabo HPT weighs just 9.7 lbs, which enhances its maneuverability and makes it easy to transport. Its lightweight design does not compromise on performance, as it comes with a stackable case for convenient storage. In comparison, the Milwaukee saw's weight isn't specified, but it is designed to be ergonomic and compact, making it suitable for all-day use. While both tools are designed for ease of handling, the Metabo HPT’s explicit lightweight nature gives it a distinct advantage for users who prioritize portability.

Additional Features

The Metabo HPT track saw includes several user-friendly features, such as an adjustable bevel from -1 to 46°, depth control with a micro-adjustment dial, and a 360° swiveling dust port that ensures a clean workspace. Moreover, it comes with a complete kit that includes a rapid charger and a battery, which adds to its overall value. The Milwaukee saw, while a bare tool, features REDLINK PLUS Intelligence for maximum performance and protection against overload, overheating, and over-discharge. Both tools are equipped with advanced technology, but the Metabo HPT provides a more comprehensive package for users looking for an all-in-one solution.

Warranty and Reliability

The Metabo HPT offers a lifetime warranty on the tool body, a 2-year warranty on the battery, and a 1-year warranty on the charger, showcasing the brand's confidence in its product's durability. This warranty structure is advantageous for users who require long-term reliability. On the other hand, while the Milwaukee brand is known for its durability and performance, specific warranty details are not provided in the comparison. Therefore, users seeking peace of mind with their purchases may find the Metabo HPT's extensive warranty more appealing.

Target Audience

The Metabo HPT is tailored to professional woodworkers and serious DIYers who need a high-performance tool for precision cutting. Its advanced features and robust design cater to intricate woodworking projects. Conversely, the Milwaukee M18 FUEL is aimed at general contractors, remodelers, and those in need of a versatile saw that can handle a variety of applications. The difference in target audience reflects the specific strengths of each tool, with the Metabo HPT focusing on high-end woodworking and the Milwaukee providing a reliable option for everyday construction tasks.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Metabo HPT 36V MultiVolt 6-1/2" Cordless Track Saw Kit and the Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/4 Inch Circular Saw depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cutting capabilities and are willing to invest more, the Metabo HPT offers exceptional power, precision, and a comprehensive kit that supports professional woodworking. However, if you seek a reliable, cost-effective saw for general tasks, the Milwaukee option stands out as a solid performer at a significantly lower price point. Ultimately, both tools have their unique strengths, catering to different user requirements.