MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS Laser IPL Hair Removal vs Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro + Slow-Grow Serum — IPL
Updated August 2026 — MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS Laser IPL Hair Removal wins on warranty and price, Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro + Slow-Grow Serum — IPL wins on cooling and comfort.
The MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS offers better value and a structured timeline for results, while the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro provides additional features at a higher price.
Why MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS Laser IPL Hair Removal is better
Price
$149.00 vs $379.00
Warranty
3-year warranty vs 90-day satisfaction promise
Flashes
999,999 flashes vs unspecified longevity
Why Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro + Slow-Grow Serum — IPL is better
Cooling Tech
CryoSoothe vs CoolMax
Anti-Aging
Includes Ageless Lens for anti-aging
Comfort Levels
5 comfort levels vs none specified
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS Laser IPL Hair Removal | Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro + Slow-Grow Serum — IPL |
|---|---|---|
| Power Levels | 9 | 5 |
| Body Areas | Multiple | All Genders |
| Treatment Time | Under 10 min | Not specified |
| User Base | 1 million+ | All Genders |
| Cooling Type | CoolMax | CryoSoothe |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
When considering at-home hair removal devices, the MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS and the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro stand out for their advanced technologies and claims of effective results. The MICHAEL TODD device is priced at $149.00, while the Nood device is significantly more expensive at $379.00. This price difference of about 61% raises questions about the value and effectiveness of each product.
Technology and Features
The MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS utilizes 50°F CoolMax technology, ensuring a painless hair removal experience. Its advanced IPL technology promises permanent hair removal results in as little as four weeks. In contrast, the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro claims to be the "world's most powerful at-home IPL device," with visible results often reported after the first use. While both devices feature innovative cooling technologies, the Nood device also introduces a unique Ageless Lens for anti-aging treatment, adding to its functionality.
Comfort and Ease of Use
The MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS emphasizes user comfort with its CoolMax comfort guarantee, designed to prevent skin irritation during treatments. It features quick glide technology that allows users to treat their entire body in under 10 minutes, making it efficient for busy lifestyles. Conversely, the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro offers five comfort levels, catering to various skin sensitivities, but does not specify the time required for full-body treatment. This focus on comfort is crucial for users who may be new to IPL technology.
Treatment Results and Efficacy
The MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS promises permanent hair removal within four weeks, with users expected to see visible results in just two weeks. This claim is backed by its dermatologist-recommended technology, which has garnered a solid reputation among its one million users. On the other hand, the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro touts near-permanent results in just weeks, with clinical-grade efficacy. While both devices suggest effective results, the MICHAEL TODD device has a more structured timeline for achieving permanent hair removal.
Maintenance and Longevity
With 999,999 flashes, the MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS boasts a long-lasting lifespan, eliminating the need for costly replacements or refills, which can be a significant ongoing expense with other devices. This feature means users can expect years of use without incurring additional costs. The Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro also claims a lifetime flash replacement guarantee, promoting a one-time purchase model. However, the specifics of flash longevity are less clear than those of the MICHAEL TODD device.
Warranty and Customer Support
The MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS comes with a three-year limited warranty, demonstrating the brand's confidence in its product quality and customer satisfaction. This extended warranty period is favorable for buyers looking for reassurance on their investment. On the other hand, the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro is backed by a 90-day satisfaction promise, which, while encouraging, is significantly shorter than the warranty offered by MICHAEL TODD. This difference in warranty length may influence buyers seeking long-term reliability.
User Demographics
Both the MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS and the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro are designed to be effective for women and men, making them versatile options for a wide range of users. The MICHAEL TODD device is suitable for multiple body areas, including arms, underarms, legs, and more, while the Nood device also emphasizes its effectiveness across skin tones. This universal appeal is important for customers looking for a family-friendly option.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS and the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro comes down to individual preferences and budget considerations. The MICHAEL TODD device offers a compelling value at $149.00, with a long lifespan, extensive warranty, and a structured timeline for results. On the other hand, the Nood device, priced at $379.00, presents itself as a premium option with additional features like anti-aging treatments and high power. For those prioritizing budget and straightforward hair removal efficiency, the MICHAEL TODD BEAUTY - LUMOS may be the better choice. However, those willing to invest more for additional features might find the Nood™ NEW Flasher Pro appealing.

