Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/ vs SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw
Updated July 2026 — Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/ wins on price and sales rank, SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw wins on cut capacity and weight.
The Milwaukee saw offers better value and portability, while the SKIL excels in cutting capacity and heavy-duty performance.
Why Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/ is better
Price
Milwaukee is $422 cheaper
Portability
Milwaukee is battery-operated
Sales Rank
Milwaukee has a better sales rank
Why SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw is better
Cutting Capacity
SKIL cuts up to 6-1/4 inches
Motor Power
SKIL has a 15 AMP motor
Build Quality
SKIL features a magnesium die-cast footplate
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/ | SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | Brushless | Dual-Field |
| Battery Operated | Yes | No |
| Cut Speed | 6000 RPM | N/A |
| Construction | Magnesium | Magnesium |
| Blade Size | 7-1/4 inch | 16-5/16 inch |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/4 Inch Circular Saw is priced at $214.99, making it significantly cheaper than the SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw Circular Saw, which retails for $636.99. This difference means that the Milwaukee saw is about 66% less expensive than its competitor. For those on a budget or looking for a reliable tool without breaking the bank, the Milwaukee option presents a compelling case. On the other hand, the higher price of the SKIL may reflect its intended use for more heavy-duty applications, suggesting that users should consider the scope of their projects when weighing price against performance.
Cutting Capacity
When it comes to cutting capacity, the SKIL Worm Drive Skilsaw stands out with its impressive 6-1/4 inch cutting ability, designed to handle lumber up to 6 inches thick in one pass. In contrast, the Milwaukee saw offers a 2-5/8 inch cut capacity. Users who need to make larger cuts efficiently may find the SKIL saw more suited to their needs. This significant difference in cutting capacity can be a deciding factor for professionals working on larger construction projects that require deeper cuts.
Motor Performance
The SKIL saw features a robust 15 AMP Dual-Field motor, which is engineered to keep the motor cooler and provide increased power during operation. Meanwhile, the Milwaukee model is equipped with a POWERSTATE Brushless Motor that delivers 6,000 RPM, maintaining high speed under load. Both motors are designed for performance, but the SKIL's motor may offer an edge for prolonged, heavy-duty tasks, whereas the Milwaukee's brushless motor provides efficiency and longevity for various applications. Users should consider the type of work they will be doing to determine which motor aligns better with their needs.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of build quality, the SKIL saw features an all magnesium construction that ensures durability while also being lightweight. Its die-cast footplate is designed to guarantee accurate cuts. Conversely, the Milwaukee saw also boasts a magnesium design for its guards and shoes, indicating a focus on durability. However, the SKIL's magnesium die-cast footplate specifically highlights a commitment to ensuring true, square cuts, which may be crucial for precision work. Users who prioritize a lightweight yet durable design might lean towards the SKIL model due to its emphasis on accurate performance.
Battery vs. Corded Operation
The Milwaukee M18 FUEL is a battery-operated tool, capable of delivering up to 750 cuts per charge when paired with the M18 REDLITHIUM FORGE HD12.0 battery. This cordless feature provides mobility on the job site, eliminating the need for extension cords. In contrast, the SKIL Worm Drive Circular Saw is corded, which means it requires a direct power source. While corded saws can provide uninterrupted power, the Milwaukee's cordless design offers greater flexibility and convenience, especially for outdoor or large-scale projects where access to outlets may be limited.
Ergonomics and User Experience
Ergonomically, the Milwaukee saw is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it suitable for all-day cutting without causing excessive fatigue. It also features positive bevel and depth detents for added productivity. The SKIL saw, while also designed for durability, emphasizes its magnesium construction for reduced weight, which could enhance user experience during long work sessions. However, the Milwaukee’s additional features, like the electric blade brake and LED work light, may contribute to a more user-friendly experience, especially in low-light conditions.
Sales Rank and Market Position
The Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/4 Inch Circular Saw has a sales rank of 20,665, indicating a strong position in the market. In contrast, the SKIL Worm Drive Circular Saw has a sales rank of 52,459, suggesting it is less popular among consumers. A higher sales rank can be indicative of customer satisfaction, reliability, and overall popularity, which may influence potential buyers' decisions. While both tools cater to different user needs, the Milwaukee's higher sales rank may reflect its broader appeal and trusted performance among professionals.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Milwaukee M18 FUEL 7-1/4 Inch Circular Saw and the SKIL 16-5/16 In. Magnesium Worm Drive Skilsaw comes down to individual needs and project requirements. If you prioritize price, portability, and a robust battery-operated option, the Milwaukee is the clear winner at $214.99. However, if your work involves cutting larger materials and you require a tool built for heavy-duty performance, the SKIL, despite its higher price of $636.99, may be the more suitable choice. Ultimately, assess the specific demands of your projects to determine which saw aligns best with your needs.

