Moto G Power 5G | 2024 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/128GB | 50MP Camera | Midnight Blue vs SAMSUNG Galaxy A36 5G 2025 | 256GB, Dual SIM | 6.7" 120Hz AMOLED, IP67 Water Resistant, Android 15 | International Model Factory Unlocked for T-Mobile & Global | 25W Fast Charger Bundle (Black)

Display Quality: Samsung A36 5G Offers Superior Visuals

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G delivers a noticeably better display than the Moto G Power 5G. While both feature a 6.7-inch FHD+ screen with a 120Hz refresh rate, the A36 uses a Super AMOLED panel, which offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and higher peak brightness—up to 1,200 nits—compared to the Moto’s standard FHD+ display. This makes the A36 significantly better for outdoor viewing and media consumption. The Moto’s display is capable but lacks the advanced panel technology found in the Samsung model. Additionally, the A36’s higher brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight, a key advantage for users who spend time outdoors.

Camera Performance: Motorola Leads in Low-Light Clarity

The Moto G Power 5G has a distinct edge in camera capability due to its 50MP sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), enabling sharper low-light photos by reducing blur from hand movement. Although both phones have a 50MP main camera, the Moto’s OIS system is specifically highlighted as a feature that improves image quality in dim conditions. The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G also features a 50MP main sensor but does not mention OIS or any stabilization technology in its specs. The A36 includes an additional 8MP ultra-wide and 5MP macro lens, offering more versatility in composition, but without OIS, it may struggle with handheld shots in poor lighting. For photography enthusiasts prioritizing clarity in low light, the Moto G Power 5G is the stronger choice.

Battery Life and Charging Speed: Similar Capacity, Faster Charge on Moto

Both devices come equipped with a 5,000mAh battery, promising long-lasting performance throughout the day. However, the Moto G Power 5G supports faster charging at up to 30W TurboPower, allowing it to recharge more quickly than the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G’s 25W fast charging. This 5W difference translates into meaningful time savings during recharging—about 20% faster under optimal conditions. The A36’s 25W charging is still efficient but lags behind the Moto’s top speed. Both phones offer similar endurance, but the Moto provides a tangible advantage in real-world charging speed, making it better suited for users who need a quick power boost.

Storage and Expandability: Samsung Offers More Built-in Space, No SD Slot

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G comes with 256GB of internal storage, nearly double the 128GB offered by the Moto G Power 5G. This gives users significantly more room for apps, photos, videos, and files without needing external storage. However, the A36 lacks a microSD card slot entirely, meaning no expandable storage option. In contrast, the Moto G Power 5G supports up to 1TB via microSD card, providing flexibility for those who accumulate large media libraries. While the A36 wins on built-in capacity, the Moto’s expandability offers greater long-term adaptability for users with growing storage needs.

Processor and Software Updates: Samsung Delivers Future-Proofing

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, an octa-core processor with an Adreno 710 GPU, designed for smooth multitasking and gaming. More importantly, it promises up to six major Android upgrades and six years of security updates, ensuring long-term software support. The Moto G Power 5G uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7020, also an octa-core chip, but no information is provided about future OS updates. With Android 15 already included, the A36 is positioned as a device with a clear upgrade path, while the Moto’s update lifecycle remains unspecified. For users seeking longevity and ongoing security patches, the Samsung model is clearly superior.

Durability and Design: Samsung Wins with IP67 Protection

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G stands out with IP67 dust and water resistance, meaning it can withstand immersion in up to one meter of water for 30 minutes and is protected against dust ingress. This level of protection is absent in the Moto G Power 5G, which only mentions a fingerprint-resistant back cover made from vegan leather. The A36 also features Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ on its front, enhancing drop and scratch resistance. These durability features make the Samsung phone far more resilient in real-world conditions, especially for users prone to spills or outdoor use. The Moto’s design is premium-looking but lacks any official environmental protection.

Price and Value: Moto G Power 5G Is Nearly 55% Cheaper

The most striking difference between the two phones is price. The Moto G Power 5G is priced at $127.18, while the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G costs $284.99—nearly 17% cheaper at $127.18 versus $284.99. This represents a price gap of $157.81, making the Moto over 55% less expensive. Despite being significantly cheaper, the Moto offers competitive specs including a 120Hz display, 5G connectivity, 50MP camera with OIS, and expandable storage. The Samsung model adds premium features like IP67 protection, a brighter AMOLED display, and longer software support, but at a steep cost. For budget-conscious buyers, the Moto delivers exceptional value.

Which should you buy?

Choose the Moto G Power 5G if you want a budget-friendly smartphone with strong battery life, fast charging, a 50MP camera with OIS, and expandable storage—all for just $127.18. It’s ideal for users prioritizing value, long-term usability, and practical features without paying a premium. Opt for the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G only if you need IP67 water and dust resistance, a brighter Super AMOLED display, and guaranteed six years of OS updates, despite its $284.99 price tag and lack of expandable storage. If your priority is affordability and solid performance, the Moto G Power 5G is the smarter, more economical choice.