MZK 20V 13" Electric Lawn Mower vs LawnMaster CLM2413A Cordless 13-Inch
Updated April 2026 — MZK 20V 13" Electric Lawn Mower wins on cutting height range and motor speed, LawnMaster CLM2413A Cordless 13-Inch wins on grass catcher and motor technology.
$155.49LawnMaster CLM2413A Cordless 13-Inch Lawn Mower 24V Max with 2X4.0Ah Battery and a Charger
LawnMaster
$149.99MZK 20V 13" Electric Lawn Mower, Brushless Cordless Lawn Mower with 4-Position Height Adjustment, Walk-Behind Push Mowers with 8 Gallon Grass Bag, 2 x 4.0Ah Batteries & Charger Included, LM13B8, Red
MZK
The LawnMaster CLM2413A (Product B) edges out the MZK 20V (Product A) due to a lower price point and the inclusion of a brushless motor and 30-liter grass catcher. However, the MZK 20V model offers a wider range of cutting height adjustments and specifies a higher motor speed.
Why MZK 20V 13" Electric Lawn Mower is better
Wider cutting height range
Adjusts from 1-inch to 2.55-inch compared to 1.2 inches to 1.5 inches
More cutting positions
Offers 5 positions versus 4 positions
Specified motor speed
Listed at 3700 RPM whereas competitor is unspecified
Why LawnMaster CLM2413A Cordless 13-Inch is better
Lower price point
Priced at $149.99 compared to $155.49
Included grass catcher capacity
Features a 30-liter grass catcher versus unspecified
Brushless motor technology
Equipped with brushless motor versus unspecified type
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | MZK 20V 13" Electric Lawn Mower | LawnMaster CLM2413A Cordless 13-Inch |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | LawnMaster | MZK |
| Cutting Width | 13-inch | 13-inch |
| Cutting Positions | 5 | 4 |
| Height Range | 1-inch to 2.55-inch | 1.2 inches to 1.5 inches |
| Battery | 2x24V MAX 4.0Ah | 4Ah |
| Motor Speed | 3700 RPM | null |
| Weight | 23.15 lbs | null |
| Grass Catcher | null | 30-liter |
Dimension comparison
Design and build quality
The physical construction of these cordless lawn mowers focuses on maneuverability and durability. Product A specifies a weight of 23.15 lbs, which provides a concrete data point for users concerned about lifting and storage. It features 5.51-inch wheels designed to facilitate movement across various terrains. Product B describes itself as lightweight and maneuverable but does not provide a specific weight measurement in the available data. Both units utilize a deck design intended for residential lawn care, with Product A noting a high-impact rust-resistant deck material. The build quality aims to balance sturdiness with ease of handling for typical yard maintenance tasks.
Cutting deck and width
Both models offer a 13-inch cutting width, which is standard for compact cordless mowers intended for smaller lawns. Product A describes this as a 12.4-inch cutting width in one section and 13-inch in another, while Product B consistently lists a 13-inch cutting width. This width allows users to cover ground efficiently without requiring excessive passes over small areas. The deck on Product A is highlighted as rust-resistant, which may contribute to longevity when exposed to moisture and grass clippings. Product B emphasizes that the spacious cutting deck minimizes the number of passes needed, allowing for quicker completion of lawn care tasks. The similarity in width suggests comparable performance in terms of swath coverage per pass.
Cutting height adjustment
Adjustability is a key differentiator between these two units. Product A provides 5 cutting positions, allowing users to change the height of cuts between 1-inch and 2.55-inch using a one-touch lever. This range offers flexibility for different grass types and seasonal growth patterns. Product B offers 4 adjustable cutting heights ranging from 1.2 inches to 1.5 inches. While Product B's range is narrower, it still accommodates various grass types. Product A's wider range from 1-inch to 2.55-inch provides more versatility for users who prefer either very short or taller cuts. The one-touch lever on Product A is designed for effortless changes, whereas Product B notes easy adjustment to keep yards in top condition throughout growing seasons.
Motor and performance
The motor technology drives the cutting performance of each mower. Product A is powered by an engine that provides a speed of 3700 RPM. This specific metric gives users an idea of the blade rotation speed during operation. Product B features a brushless motor, which is generally associated with higher efficiency and reduced maintenance compared to brushed motors. The manufacturer claims this design enhances power and reduces maintenance, making mowing tasks smoother. While Product A provides a specific RPM figure, Product B focuses on the motor type efficiency. Both are designed to deliver optimal performance for residential cutting needs, though the brushless designation in Product B may imply longer motor life.
Battery life and efficiency
Power delivery is managed through lithium-ion battery systems in both models. Product A includes 2x24V MAX 4.0Ah batteries, providing a substantial power reserve for extended use. The inclusion of two batteries allows for swapping during operation to minimize downtime. Product B is paired with 4Ah batteries and claims extended runtime to ensure jobs are done without frequent interruptions. While Product A specifies the voltage as 24V MAX and includes two units, Product B confirms the 4Ah capacity but does not explicitly state the count or voltage in the provided feature list. Both systems aim to provide cordless freedom, eliminating the need for power cords during operation.
Grass collection system
Handling clippings is an essential part of the mowing process. Product B includes a 30-liter grass catcher, providing a specific capacity for collecting clippings. This spacious catcher helps minimize the frequency of emptying during a mowing session. Product A does not list a grass catcher capacity or inclusion in the provided features. The presence of a 30-liter bag on Product B adds value for users who prefer bagging clippings over mulching or side discharge. For Product A, the collection method remains unspecified based on the available data, which may require users to verify compatibility with additional attachments if bagging is desired.
Price and value
Cost is a significant factor in the decision-making process for home equipment. Product B is priced at $149.99, making it the more affordable option between the two. Product A is listed at $155.49, which is slightly higher. Both models offer cordless convenience and similar cutting widths. Product B's lower price combined with the inclusion of a brushless motor and grass catcher may present a stronger value proposition for budget-conscious buyers. Product A justifies its slightly higher cost with a wider cutting height range and the inclusion of two specified batteries. Users must weigh the importance of specific specs against the price difference when determining overall value.
Which one should you buy?
Choosing between these models depends on specific lawn care priorities. If cutting height versatility and specified motor speed are priorities, Product A is the suitable choice due to its 5 cutting positions and 3700 RPM motor. It is also beneficial for those who want confirmed dual battery inclusion. However, if price, grass collection capacity, and motor technology type are more important, Product B is the recommended option. It offers a brushless motor, a 30-liter catcher, and a lower price point. Both units serve the 13-inch compact mower category well, but Product B edges ahead in overall value and modern motor technology.