Nikon 55- vs Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
Updated July 2026 — Nikon 55- wins on warranty, Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- wins on price and zoom range.
The Nikon 55-300mm offers superior optical performance and features, making it the better choice for serious photographers, while the 55-200mm is a more budget-friendly option.
Why Nikon 55- is better
Price
The 55-200mm is significantly cheaper.
Weight
The 55-200mm is lighter at 9 ounces.
Warranty
The 55-200mm has a longer one-year warranty.
Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- is better
Optics
The 55-300mm has a high refractive index element.
Zoom Range
The 55-300mm offers a longer zoom range.
Image Stabilization
The 55-300mm features VR II for better stabilization.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon 55- | Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- |
|---|---|---|
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| HRI Element | No | Yes |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| VR Type | VR | VR II |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/4.5-5.6 |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Nikon Lenses
When it comes to selecting a zoom lens for your Nikon DSLR, the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR and the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED are two popular options. Both lenses are designed to offer versatility and quality for photographers, but they cater to slightly different needs and budgets. The Nikon 55-200mm is priced at $135.00, while the 55-300mm comes in at a higher price of $254.00, making it about 87% more expensive.
Optical Performance
The optical performance of a lens is crucial for achieving high-quality images. The Nikon 55-200mm features two extra-low-dispersion (ED) glass elements that help minimize chromatic aberration, ensuring clarity and sharpness. Meanwhile, the Nikon 55-300mm also includes two ED elements and adds a high refractive index (HRI) lens element, which contributes to a more compact design while maintaining image quality. The 55-300mm's additional range allows for capturing distant subjects, making it ideal for sports and wildlife photography.
Autofocus Capabilities
Both lenses are equipped with Nikon's Silent Wave Motor technology, which provides fast and quiet autofocus. However, the 55-300mm offers added features, including a tripod detection mode that reduces vibration when mounted on a tripod. This can be particularly beneficial for long-duration shooting sessions. While both lenses excel in autofocus performance, the 55-300mm’s extra capabilities provide an edge for serious photographers.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of build quality, the Nikon 55-200mm is designed to be lightweight, weighing only 9 ounces, making it easy to carry around for extended periods. The 55-300mm, being a more robust lens, may be slightly heavier but offers a more advanced construction due to its additional features and elements. The 55-200mm comes in bulk packaging, while the 55-300mm is a certified refurbished product, suggesting a certain level of quality assurance, though it may show limited wear.
Image Stabilization Features
Both lenses come with Nikon's Vibration Reduction (VR) technology, which is crucial for shooting at slower shutter speeds without introducing blur. The Nikon 55-200mm VR system is effective; however, the 55-300mm employs the newer VR II image stabilization, which allows for handheld shooting at shutter speeds up to four times slower than would otherwise be possible. This enhancement means the 55-300mm can produce sharper images in challenging lighting conditions, making it a better choice for low-light scenarios.
Warranty and Support
The Nikon 55-200mm lens comes with a one-year warranty, giving buyers peace of mind regarding their investment. On the other hand, the Nikon 55-300mm, being a certified refurbished product, includes a 90-day warranty from Nikon. While the one-year warranty offers longer protection, the refurbished lens may still provide exceptional reliability, especially considering it has been inspected and restored by the manufacturer.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant factor when choosing between these two lenses. The Nikon 55-200mm is priced at $135.00, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, the Nikon 55-300mm is priced at $254.00, which is about 87% more expensive. This price difference reflects the additional features and optical capabilities of the 55-300mm, but for those on a tighter budget, the 55-200mm presents a compelling value without sacrificing too much in terms of performance.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Nikon 55-200mm and the Nikon 55-300mm ultimately comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you require a lightweight, affordable lens that still delivers good performance, the Nikon 55-200mm is an excellent choice. However, if you’re looking for superior optical performance, enhanced autofocus capabilities, and better image stabilization, the Nikon 55-300mm justifies its higher price with its versatility and advanced features. Consider what you value most in a lens, and choose accordingly.

