vsversusfinder

Nikon 55- vs OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-

Updated July 2026 — Nikon 55- wins on focal length, OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- wins on price and weight.

The Nikon lens offers better value and versatility, while the Olympus lens provides a sleek design and compatibility with Micro Four Thirds systems.

Why Nikon 55- is better

Price

Nikon is $41.99 cheaper

Focal Length

Nikon has a longer reach at 55-200mm

Weight

Nikon is lighter at 9 ounces

Why OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- is better

Design

Olympus has a sleek silver finish

Compatibility

Olympus works with Micro Four Thirds cameras

Zoom Capability

Olympus has a 3.75x zoom

Overall score

Nikon 55-
85
OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-
78

Specifications

SpecNikon 55-OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-
Max Aperturef/4-5.6f/4-5.6
AutofocusSilent Wave MotorHigh-Speed Imager AF
Optical Elements2 ED elementsStandard
Zoom TypeStandardStandard
Warranty1 yearStandard

Dimension comparison

Nikon 55-OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-

Overview

When choosing between the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Zoom Lens and the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R, both lenses offer unique advantages tailored for different photography needs. The Nikon lens is priced at $135.00, while the Olympus lens comes in at $175.99, making the Nikon about 23% cheaper. This price difference could influence buyers depending on their budget and specific requirements.

Design and Build Quality

The Nikon 55-200mm lens features bulk packaging in a white box, which may appeal to those looking for cost-effective options without compromising quality. Weighing just 9 ounces, it is designed for portability and ease of use. On the other hand, the OM SYSTEM lens has a sleek silver finish, adding an aesthetic touch to the camera setup. Both lenses are constructed to withstand regular use, but the Nikon's lightweight design may make it more appealing for long shooting sessions or travel.

Focal Length and Zoom Capability

The Nikon lens offers a focal length range of 55-200mm, while the Olympus lens has a 40-150mm range. This means the Nikon provides a slightly longer reach, making it better suited for wildlife or sports photography, where distance is often a factor. The Olympus lens, with its 3.75x zoom capability, may prove sufficient for general photography, but the Nikon's extended range allows for more versatile shooting opportunities.

Maximum Aperture

The maximum aperture for both lenses is f/4-5.6, which is similar across the board. This means both lenses perform similarly in terms of light-gathering capabilities, making them suitable for shooting in various lighting conditions. However, the Nikon lens's optical design includes two extra-low-dispersion glass elements, which may provide better image quality by minimizing chromatic aberration. This characteristic could be a deciding factor for photographers who prioritize image clarity.

Autofocus Performance

The Nikon 55-200mm lens is equipped with a Silent Wave Motor, which allows for quick and quiet autofocus. This feature can be particularly beneficial in situations where silence is necessary, such as during wildlife photography. In contrast, the Olympus lens boasts High-Speed Imager AF (MSC), which also promises quick focusing. While both lenses have advanced autofocus systems, the specific needs of the photographer—such as the type of photography—might make one more suitable than the other.

Compatibility and Versatility

The Nikon lens is specifically designed for Nikon digital SLR cameras, ensuring compatibility and optimal performance within that ecosystem. Conversely, the Olympus lens is compatible with Micro Four Thirds system cameras, making it versatile for users of both Olympus and Panasonic cameras. This differentiation is crucial for potential buyers, as the choice of lens greatly depends on the camera system they already own or plan to invest in.

Price Comparison

With the Nikon lens priced at $135.00 and the Olympus lens at $175.99, there is a clear price disparity between the two. The Nikon provides a cost-effective option for those seeking a quality zoom lens without breaking the bank. The price difference of about $41.99 could be significant for amateur photographers or those starting their photography journey. However, if the intended use justifies the additional cost, the Olympus lens may be worth considering for its design and features.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Zoom Lens and the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R depends on several factors, including budget, camera compatibility, and specific photography needs. The Nikon lens stands out for its lower price and longer focal length, making it ideal for budget-conscious photographers who need versatility. Meanwhile, the Olympus lens offers a sleek design and compatibility with Micro Four Thirds systems, appealing to users within that ecosystem. Consider your photography style, equipment, and budget to make an informed decision.