Nikon 55- vs Tamron
Updated July 2026 — Nikon 55- leads on focal length and max aperture.
The Nikon 55-200mm lens offers greater versatility and a lower price, while the Tamron 24mm excels in low-light performance and compactness.
Why Nikon 55- is better
Price
Nikon is $64 cheaper
Versatility
Nikon offers a zoom range
Weight
Nikon is slightly heavier but still manageable
Why Tamron is better
Aperture
Tamron has a wider f/2.8 aperture
Build Quality
Tamron features weather resistance
Macro Capability
Tamron allows for close-up shots
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon 55- | Tamron |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | Silent Wave Motor | Standard |
| Magnification | N/A | 1:2 |
| Weather Resistance | No | Yes |
| Optical Elements | 2 ED elements | LD and GM elements |
| Warranty | 1 Year | N/A |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Nikon 55-200mm and Tamron 24mm
The Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR lens is priced at $135.00, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 lens costs $199.00, making the Nikon about 32% cheaper. Both lenses cater to distinct photography needs, with the Nikon offering a versatile zoom range ideal for various shooting scenarios, whereas the Tamron serves as a compact wide-angle lens designed for close-ups and landscapes.
Design and Build Quality
The Nikon 55-200mm features a bulk packaging design, meaning it comes in a white box rather than retail packaging, which might appeal to budget-conscious buyers. It's 2.7 inches in diameter and weighs 9 ounces, giving it a solid feel without being overly cumbersome. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm lens boasts a compact design with a length of just 2.5 inches and a weight of 7.6 ounces. This lightweight build makes it particularly portable, making it an excellent choice for photographers who prioritize ease of transport.
Focal Length and Versatility
With a focal length range of 55-200mm, the Nikon lens offers significant versatility, allowing for both wide-angle and telephoto shots. This capability is particularly beneficial for capturing subjects at varying distances without needing to change lenses frequently. Conversely, the Tamron lens has a fixed focal length of 24mm, which is ideal for wide-angle photography but limits the versatility compared to the Nikon. Photographers looking to shoot landscapes or urban scenes will find the Tamron's 24mm focal length enhances their creative options, especially for capturing expansive views.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Nikon 55-200mm has a variable aperture of f/4-5.6, while the Tamron 24mm lens offers a wider constant aperture of f/2.8. This difference allows the Tamron to perform better in low-light conditions, enabling photographers to capture brighter images without increasing the ISO. The ability to achieve a shallower depth of field with the Tamron also allows for more creative control over background blur, which is particularly appealing for portrait photographers.
Autofocus and Operational Features
The Nikon lens is equipped with a Silent Wave Motor, which ensures quick and quiet autofocus, making it ideal for capturing spontaneous moments without disturbing the environment. The lens weighs slightly more than the Tamron, which may impact its handling during extended shooting sessions. On the other hand, the Tamron 24mm lens is designed with a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio, allowing for detailed macro-style shots. This feature enhances the Tamron's usability for photographers interested in capturing intricate details, making it a compelling option for those who engage in close-up photography.
Durability and Weather Resistance
The Tamron 24mm lens features Moisture-Resistant Construction and a dirt-resistant Fluorine Coating, ensuring that it can withstand outdoor conditions. This durability is crucial for photographers who frequently shoot in variable weather. While the Nikon lens does not highlight specific weather-resistant features, it is constructed with two extra-low-dispersion glass elements, which help minimize chromatic aberration and enhance optical performance. However, for outdoor enthusiasts, the added weather resistance of the Tamron provides peace of mind that the lens can handle challenging conditions.
Price Comparison
At $135.00, the Nikon 55-200mm lens offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Tamron 24mm lens, which is priced at $199.00. This price difference of about $64 may be significant for those who are new to photography or looking to expand their lens collection without a substantial investment. However, the features and capabilities of the lenses cater to different needs, which means the value proposition may vary depending on the photographer's specific requirements.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Nikon 55-200mm and the Tamron 24mm depends on your photographic needs and preferences. If you require versatility and a range of focal lengths for various shooting situations, the Nikon lens is the more economical choice at $135.00. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, compactness, and the ability to capture detailed close-ups, the Tamron lens at $199.00 offers features that justify its higher price. Ultimately, both lenses serve different purposes, making your choice dependent on your individual photography style and requirements.

