Nikon 55- vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Nikon 55- wins on focal length and weight, VILTROX wins on min focus dist..
The Nikon 55-200mm offers versatility at a lower price, while the VILTROX 35mm excels in low-light performance and portrait photography.
Why Nikon 55- is better
Price
Nikon is $44 cheaper than VILTROX
Zoom Range
Nikon offers a wider zoom range
Weight
Nikon is lighter at 9 ounces
Why VILTROX is better
Aperture
VILTROX has a brighter f/1.7 aperture
Close Focus
VILTROX has a minimum focusing distance of 0.33m
Optical Design
VILTROX has 11 elements for better image quality
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon 55- | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | Silent Wave Motor | STM Motor |
| Optical Elements | 2 ED | 11 in 9 groups |
| Warranty | 1 Year | N/A |
| Packaging | Bulk | Standard |
| Photography Type | Versatile | Portraits |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR and VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji
The Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR is a versatile zoom lens priced at $135.00, while the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji is a prime lens available at $179.00. This price difference of about 32.6% makes the Nikon lens a more budget-friendly option. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, with the Nikon lens offering a wider zoom range and the VILTROX lens emphasizing low-light performance and portrait capabilities.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Nikon 55-200mm features a classic zoom lens construction, measuring 2.7 inches in diameter and 3.1 inches in length. It weighs only 9 ounces, making it relatively lightweight for a zoom lens. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm is designed for Fujifilm X-Mount cameras, showcasing a sleek, modern aesthetic that appeals to many photographers. The VILTROX lens includes thoughtful design details, such as an extended lens hood and a USB-C upgrade port for firmware updates, enhancing its long-term usability. The bulk packaging of the Nikon lens, however, may not be as appealing as the polished presentation of the VILTROX.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is a crucial factor, and both lenses excel in different areas. The Nikon 55-200mm lens features two extra-low-dispersion (ED) glass elements to minimize chromatic aberration, providing superior optics for zoom photography. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 35mm boasts an optimized design with 11 elements in 9 groups, including 2 high refractive elements and 1 extra-low dispersion element, ensuring outstanding image quality. The VILTROX lens shines in low-light conditions, thanks to its bright f/1.7 aperture, which is beneficial for portrait and street photography.
Autofocus Capabilities
When it comes to autofocus performance, the Nikon 55-200mm lens utilizes Silent Wave Motor technology, which enables quick and quiet high-speed autofocusing. This is particularly advantageous for capturing fast-moving subjects. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm features a new STM motor that ensures fast, precise, and near-silent autofocus as well, making it suitable for both still photography and video recording. The ability of both lenses to deliver efficient autofocus makes them appealing choices for photographers who prioritize speed and accuracy.
Versatility in Photography
The versatility of a lens can greatly influence a photographer's choice. The Nikon 55-200mm lens is particularly versatile due to its 55-200mm zoom range, making it suitable for a variety of photography styles, from landscapes to portraits. This adaptability is enhanced by its f/4-5.6 maximum aperture, which provides decent performance in various lighting conditions. In contrast, the VILTROX 35mm is designed primarily for portrait and street photography, excelling in low-light scenarios thanks to its f/1.7 maximum aperture. Each lens caters to different shooting preferences, with the Nikon lens offering broader versatility while the VILTROX focuses on low-light excellence.
Minimum Focusing Distance
Minimum focusing distance is an important factor for close-up photography. The Nikon 55-200mm has a standard minimum focusing distance suitable for general photography. However, the VILTROX 35mm excels with a close focusing distance of just 0.33 meters (33cm), allowing photographers to capture stunning close-up shots with incredible detail. This feature makes the VILTROX particularly appealing for macro photography enthusiasts or anyone looking to capture intricate details in their subjects.
Price Comparison
Pricing is a significant consideration for many buyers. The Nikon 55-200mm is priced at $135.00, while the VILTROX 35mm comes in at $179.00. This means the VILTROX lens is approximately $44.00 more expensive than the Nikon lens, which may influence budget-conscious photographers. However, the premium price of the VILTROX lens reflects its advanced features, such as the f/1.7 aperture and enhanced optical design, which may justify the investment for those seeking specific performance improvements.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR and the VILTROX 35mm f1.7 Fuji depends on your photography needs. If you require a versatile zoom lens for various shooting scenarios at a more accessible price, the Nikon 55-200mm is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, portrait capabilities, and are willing to invest a bit more, the VILTROX 35mm may be the better option. Both lenses offer unique advantages, so your choice should align with your specific photographic goals.

