Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR vs Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Snap-On Lens
Updated July 2026 — Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR wins on length and width, Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Snap-On Lens wins on max magnification.
The Nikon lens excels in versatility and optical quality, while the Raynox lens is a budget-friendly option for macro photography.
Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR is better
Optical Quality
Nikon lens offers superior optical performance.
Autofocus
Nikon lens features fast and quiet autofocus.
Build Quality
Nikon lens has a robust construction with moisture sealing.
Why Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Snap-On Lens is better
Price
Raynox lens is significantly cheaper.
Macro Capability
Raynox lens is specifically designed for macro photography.
Ease of Use
Raynox lens allows for quick attachment and removal.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR | Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Snap-On Lens |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/1.8 to f/22 | N/A |
| Focal Length | 35mm | N/A |
| Max Reproduction | 0.16x | N/A |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Compatibility | Nikon DX/FX | 52mm-67mm |
Dimension comparison
Overview
In this comparison, we will examine the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens and the Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Snap-On Lens. The Nikon lens is priced at $213.31, while the Raynox lens is about 65% cheaper at $75.50. Both lenses serve different photographic needs, so understanding their features and capabilities is essential for making an informed decision.
Design and Build Quality
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens boasts a compact and lightweight design, measuring approximately 70 x 52.5 millimeters. It features a robust construction that includes a rubber seal to minimize moisture ingress, making it suitable for various shooting conditions. In contrast, the Raynox DCR-250 is designed as a snap-on lens, which allows for easy attachment and removal. It is compatible with filter sizes ranging from 52mm to 67mm, making it versatile in terms of use. While the Nikon lens is engineered for durability, the Raynox is designed for convenience, appealing to photographers who prioritize quick setup.
Optical Performance
The optical performance of the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is noteworthy, featuring an aperture range of f/1.8 to f/22 and a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.16x. This allows for excellent low-light performance and depth of field control, ideal for portraits and landscape photography. Meanwhile, the Raynox DCR-250 excels in macro photography by providing maximum macro magnification when used at the telephoto position of a zoom lens. While the Nikon lens offers a standard focal length equivalent to 50mm, the Raynox is specifically tailored for extreme close-ups, making each lens suitable for distinct photographic applications.
Autofocus and Focus Modes
The Nikon lens incorporates a Silent Wave Motor (SWM) that enables fast, accurate, and quiet autofocus. It also features two focus modes: M/A (manual override autofocus) and M (manual focus), providing flexibility for various shooting situations. On the other hand, the Raynox DCR-250 does not feature any autofocus capabilities as it is a supplementary lens. Instead, it relies on the primary lens's focus mechanism for achieving sharp images. This distinction is crucial for photographers who rely on quick autofocus versus those who prefer manual control for macro shots.
Compatibility
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is specifically designed for Nikon DX-format DSLR cameras but is also compatible with FX cameras in DX crop mode. This makes it a versatile option for Nikon users who may upgrade their camera bodies. The Raynox DCR-250 is more universally compatible, fitting lenses with filter sizes between 52mm and 67mm, making it a flexible choice for photographers using different brands and models. This broad compatibility allows the Raynox lens to appeal to a wider audience, particularly those who own multiple lenses.
Use Cases
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is ideal for low-light conditions, environmental portraits, and general photography. Its design allows for discreet snapshots, making it a favorite among street photographers. On the other hand, the Raynox DCR-250 is specifically crafted for macro photography, allowing users to capture intricate details of small subjects. This lens is perfect for nature photographers, product photography, and anyone looking to explore the world of close-up images. Understanding these distinct use cases can help photographers choose the right lens based on their specific needs.
Price Comparison
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is priced at $213.31, while the Raynox DCR-250 is available for $75.50. This makes the Raynox lens about 65% cheaper than the Nikon lens. The significant price difference reflects the specific functionalities and target audiences of each product. The Nikon lens offers advanced features and optical quality aimed at serious photographers, while the Raynox lens provides an economical option for those interested in macro photography without breaking the bank.
Customer Experience and Reviews
While sales rank and customer reviews were not provided, both lenses have established themselves in the photography community. The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is well-regarded for its optical quality and performance, making it a popular choice among Nikon users. The Raynox DCR-250 is appreciated for its ease of use and ability to transform standard lenses into macro tools. Customer feedback often highlights the respective strengths of each lens, reinforcing their suitability for different photography styles.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G and the Raynox DCR-250 ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you are looking for a versatile, high-quality lens for general photography and low-light situations, the Nikon lens is the clear choice. However, if your primary interest lies in macro photography and you prefer a budget-friendly option, the Raynox lens is an excellent alternative. Each lens offers unique benefits, so consider your specific requirements and budget before making a decision.

