Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR wins on weight and length, VILTROX wins on focal length and filter size.
The Nikon lens offers durability and reliable autofocus, while the VILTROX lens is more affordable with better low-light performance.
Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR is better
Price
Nikon lens is more expensive
Build Quality
Nikon has a robust build with moisture sealing
Focal Length
Nikon is versatile for landscape and street photography
Why VILTROX is better
Aperture
VILTROX has a larger maximum aperture
Weight
VILTROX is lighter and more portable
Optical Design
VILTROX has a more complex optical structure
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | SWM | STM |
| Compatibility | Nikon DX/FX | Fujifilm X |
| Bokeh | 7-blade | 9-blade |
| Construction | 8 elements | 11 elements |
| Price | $213.31 | $180.00 |
Dimension comparison
Introduction
When comparing the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens with Auto Focus and the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF, you’re looking at two unique lenses tailored for different camera systems. The Nikon lens is designed for Nikon DSLR cameras, while the VILTROX lens is compatible with Fujifilm X-mount mirrorless cameras. Understanding their core differences will help you decide which lens suits your photography style.
Price Comparison
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is priced at $213.31, while the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF offers a lower price of $180.00. This makes the VILTROX lens about 17% cheaper than the Nikon lens. If budget is a primary consideration, the VILTROX provides a more economical choice without sacrificing quality. However, the Nikon lens is often praised for its durability and performance, which may justify its higher price for some photographers.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, both lenses are lightweight and portable, making them convenient for travel. The Nikon lens measures approximately 70mm in length and features a robust build with a rubber seal to minimize moisture ingress. In contrast, the VILTROX weighs only 171g, making it extremely easy to carry. While both lenses have a compact design, the Nikon's solid construction may appeal to those who prioritize durability, especially in challenging shooting conditions.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Nikon lens boasts a maximum aperture of f/1.8, providing decent low-light performance and depth of field control. On the other hand, the VILTROX lens has a slightly larger maximum aperture of f/1.7, allowing it to gather more light, which can be advantageous in darker environments. This small difference in aperture makes the VILTROX potentially better for low-light portrait photography, giving it an edge for those who often shoot in challenging lighting conditions.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Nikon lens offers a 35mm focal length, equivalent to 52.5mm on a full-frame camera, making it a versatile option for landscape and street photography. The VILTROX lens, however, provides a focal length of 56mm, which translates to an 85mm equivalent on full-frame cameras. This makes the VILTROX more suitable for portrait photography, where a closer framing of subjects is often required. Depending on your primary photography focus, the choice of focal length could significantly influence your decision.
Autofocus Capabilities
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR features a Silent Wave Motor (SWM) for quiet autofocus, which is particularly beneficial for video shooting or discreet photography settings. The VILTROX uses an STM stepper motor, known for its quiet operation as well, making it equally adept for video applications. Both lenses offer fast and accurate autofocus, but the Nikon's SWM has a reputation for exceptional performance in various shooting scenarios, providing photographers with reliable focus precision.
Optical Construction
The optical design of the Nikon lens consists of 8 elements in 6 groups, which is effective in minimizing lens aberrations while enhancing image quality. The VILTROX lens features a more complex optical structure with 9 groups and 11 pieces, including 4 ED elements and 3 high refraction index lenses. This advanced construction allows the VILTROX to provide sharp images with pleasing bokeh, which is crucial for portrait photography. If optical performance is a priority, the VILTROX might have a slight advantage due to its more intricate design.
User Experience and Compatibility
Both lenses are designed for specific camera systems, which affects their usability. The Nikon lens is compatible with Nikon DX and FX format cameras, making it versatile across different models. Meanwhile, the VILTROX lens is engineered for Fujifilm's X-mount cameras, providing excellent compatibility with models like the X-T5 and X-T4. Users of Fujifilm cameras will likely find the VILTROX lens a perfect match, especially since it includes an integrated micro-USB port for firmware updates, ensuring longevity and improved performance.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G and the VILTROX 56mm F1.7 Fuji XF largely depends on your specific needs and camera system. The Nikon lens is a solid choice for its durable build and reliable autofocus, especially for those focused on landscape and street photography. However, if you primarily shoot portraits and work with Fujifilm cameras, the VILTROX lens, being more affordable and offering slightly better low-light capabilities, may be the better option. Ultimately, assess your photography style and the camera you own to make the best choice.

