vsversusfinder

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- vs Sigma 17-

Updated July 2026 — Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- wins on price and stabilization, Sigma 17- wins on optical quality and build.

The Nikon lens offers better value and versatility for budget-conscious photographers, while the Sigma lens excels in low-light performance and optical quality.

Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- is better

Price

Nikon lens is significantly cheaper at $254.

Versatility

Nikon lens has a 5.5x zoom range for distant subjects.

Image Stabilization

Nikon lens features VR II for clearer images.

Why Sigma 17- is better

Optical Quality

Sigma lens has Art-series optics for sharp detail.

Low-Light Performance

Sigma lens has a constant F1.8 aperture.

Build Quality

Sigma lens is designed for professional use.

Overall score

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-
85
Sigma 17-
75

Specifications

SpecNikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-Sigma 17-
Focal Length55-300mm17-40mm
Aperturef/4.5-5.6f/1.8
Weight1.5 lbs1.2 lbs
Zoom TypeTelephotoWide
Warranty90 daysN/A

Dimension comparison

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-Sigma 17-

Overview of the Lenses

When comparing the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC, there are significant differences in their design, purpose, and pricing. The Nikon lens is priced at $254.00, making it roughly 72% cheaper than the Sigma lens, which retails for $919.00. These price distinctions reflect not only the intended uses of each lens but also their respective capabilities and features.

Purpose and Versatility

The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm lens is designed primarily for capturing distant subjects, making it suitable for events like sports and wildlife photography. With its 5.5x telephoto zoom capability, it offers an equivalent focal length of 82.5 to 450mm in FX/35mm format, providing versatility for various shooting scenarios. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC targets a different audience, focusing on low-light conditions and creative depth effects. This lens is particularly appealing for portraiture, travel, and video work, showcasing its adaptability in diverse shooting environments.

Optical Quality

Optical quality is a crucial aspect for photographers, and both lenses deliver impressive results. The Nikon lens features a High Refractive Index lens element and two Extra-low Dispersion (ED) elements, effectively minimizing chromatic aberration and enhancing image clarity. Alternatively, the Sigma lens boasts Art-series optics, which are known for delivering sharp detail and professional-grade image quality. While both lenses excel in their respective categories, the choice depends on whether you prioritize zoom versatility or optical sharpness in low-light scenarios.

Image Stabilization

Image stabilization is critical for achieving clear, sharp images, especially in challenging shooting conditions. The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm incorporates Nikon's VR II Image Stabilization technology, allowing for handheld shooting at up to four shutter speeds slower than usual. This feature is particularly beneficial for capturing steady images in dynamic environments. Conversely, the Sigma lens does not explicitly mention image stabilization, which may be a consideration for users who frequently shoot in low-light conditions or at slower shutter speeds.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus performance can greatly influence the shooting experience, and both lenses have strengths in this area. The Nikon lens utilizes the exclusive Nikon Silent Wave Motor (SWM), which provides fast, accurate, and quiet autofocus capabilities. This feature is essential for photographers who need to capture spontaneous moments without drawing attention. The Sigma lens, while not detailed in its autofocus technology, is generally known for its reliable focusing speed, particularly in the Art series. However, specific comparisons are difficult without additional data on its autofocus system.

Build and Design

When considering build quality and design, both lenses cater to different user needs. The Nikon lens is marketed as a factory-refurbished product with a 90-day warranty, indicating a commitment to quality and reliability. Additionally, its compact design enhances portability, making it an excellent choice for travel. The Sigma 17-40mm, on the other hand, is designed specifically for Sony E-mount APS-C cameras, emphasizing a sleek and professional appearance. Both lenses are built to handle typical photography demands, but the Nikon's refurbishment aspect may appeal to budget-conscious buyers looking for quality assurance.

Pricing and Value

Pricing plays a significant role in the decision-making process for many photographers. The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm lens is currently available for $254.00, while the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is priced at $919.00, making it about 72% more expensive. This considerable price difference suggests that the Nikon lens offers excellent value, particularly for those just starting out or who are looking to expand their lens collection without a significant financial investment. The Sigma lens, while pricier, targets a niche market that demands exceptional low-light performance and artistic flexibility.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC ultimately hinges on your specific photography needs and budget. If you require a versatile telephoto zoom lens that is budget-friendly, the Nikon lens is the clear choice. Its excellent stabilization and autofocus capabilities make it ideal for capturing distant subjects in various settings. On the other hand, if your focus is on low-light performance and high-quality optics for portraits and creative work, the Sigma lens will serve you well, despite its higher price. Consider your primary shooting scenarios and budget to make an informed decision.