Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- vs Tamron 17-
Updated July 2026 — Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- wins on focal length and zoom ratio, Tamron 17- wins on price and build quality.
The Nikon lens offers a budget-friendly telephoto option, while the Tamron lens excels in versatility and optical performance.
Why Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- is better
Price
Nikon lens is significantly cheaper at $254.
Telephoto Range
Nikon lens has a longer focal length for distant subjects.
Weight
Nikon lens is lighter, making it easier to carry.
Why Tamron 17- is better
Optical Quality
Tamron lens has superior optical performance with 16 elements.
Versatility
Tamron lens covers a wider focal length range for various situations.
Low-Light Performance
Tamron lens maintains f/2.8 aperture throughout zoom range.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55- | Tamron 17- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/4.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 55-300mm | 17-70mm |
| Image Stabilization | VR II | VC |
| Autofocus | SWM | AF with AI |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When comparing the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens, the key difference lies in their focal lengths and intended use. The Nikon lens is designed for distant subjects, while the Tamron lens excels in versatility for everyday shooting.
The Nikon lens is priced at $254.00, making it about 57% cheaper than the Tamron lens, which retails for $599.00. This price difference is significant, especially for photographers on a budget who need a reliable telephoto option.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Nikon lens features a compact and lightweight construction, which is ideal for travel and sports photography. It includes a 5.5x telephoto zoom capability, making it suitable for capturing subjects from a distance, such as at athletic events or wildlife photography.
On the other hand, the Tamron lens boasts a moisture-resistant design and a fluorine coating, adding durability and protection against the elements. This makes it a great choice for outdoor photography in various conditions. Each lens has its strengths in build quality, tailored to different shooting environments.
Optical Performance
The optical performance of both lenses is impressive but serves different purposes. The Nikon lens includes two extra-low dispersion (ED) elements that effectively minimize chromatic aberration, ensuring sharp images even at wider apertures. Its Nikon VR II image stabilization allows for handheld shooting, making it easier to capture clear images in lower light conditions.
Conversely, the Tamron lens features a remarkable 16 elements in 12 groups, including two Glass Molded Aspherical (GM) elements, which contribute to its outstanding optical quality. The constant f/2.8 aperture across its zoom range allows for excellent low-light performance and creative depth of field effects, making it versatile for various photography styles.
Focal Length and Versatility
The focal length range is one of the most notable differences between the two lenses. The Nikon lens offers a zoom range of 55-300mm, which translates to an equivalent focal length of 82.5 to 450mm in FX/35mm format. This makes it ideal for photographers looking to capture distant subjects with clarity.
In contrast, the Tamron lens provides a focal length of 17-70mm, equivalent to 25.5-105mm in full-frame terms. This range is excellent for everyday use, covering wide-angle to short telephoto perspectives. The versatility of the Tamron lens allows it to be a go-to option for various situations, from landscapes to portraits.
Autofocus and Stabilization
Both lenses offer advanced autofocus and stabilization features, but they differ in approach. The Nikon lens utilizes an exclusive Silent Wave Motor (SWM) for fast and quiet autofocus, enhancing the shooting experience, especially in quiet environments. Its VR II technology also provides up to four shutter speeds slower than usual, greatly aiding handheld shooting.
The Tamron lens, on the other hand, leverages AI technology for video stabilization, which is particularly beneficial for videographers. Its VC (Vibration Compensation) system is designed to work effectively with Sony APS-C mirrorless cameras, making it an appealing choice for those who shoot video frequently. Each lens's autofocus and stabilization features cater to different types of photography and videography.
Price Point and Value
When considering price, the Nikon lens is significantly more affordable at $254.00 compared to the Tamron's $599.00. This price difference of about $345 makes the Nikon an attractive option for photographers looking for a budget-friendly telephoto lens.
While the Tamron offers advanced features and superior optical performance, the higher price point may not be justifiable for all users, especially those who primarily shoot casual photography. The value of each lens ultimately depends on the photographer's needs and budget.
Target Audience
The Nikon lens targets photographers who require a telephoto option for specific scenarios, such as wildlife, sports, or travel photography. Its price point and features make it suitable for enthusiasts and those who may not need a versatile lens for everyday use.
In contrast, the Tamron lens is designed for those who seek a high-speed standard zoom lens for everyday photography. Its broad focal range and consistent aperture make it ideal for various applications, appealing to both amateur and professional photographers alike.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm lens and the Tamron 17-70mm lens comes down to your specific photography needs and budget. If you prioritize a lower price and require a telephoto lens for distant subjects, the Nikon lens is a solid choice at $254.00. However, if you need a versatile lens that can handle a wide range of situations with excellent optical performance, the Tamron lens at $599.00 may be worth the investment.

