Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- vs Sigma 17-
Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- wins on zoom and stabilization, Sigma 17- wins on price and aperture.
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm offers superior versatility and zoom range, while the Sigma 17-40mm excels in low-light performance and affordability.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- is better
Zoom Range
Nikon offers a 14.2x zoom range compared to Sigma's fixed range.
Versatility
Nikon is suitable for various photography scenarios.
Stabilization
Nikon features advanced VR stabilization.
Why Sigma 17- is better
Aperture
Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture for low-light.
Price
Sigma is significantly cheaper at $919.
Weight
Sigma typically has a more robust build.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- | Sigma 17- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 28-400mm | 17-40mm |
| Aperture | f/4-8 | f/1.8 |
| Weight | 1.6 lbs | N/A |
| Zoom Ratio | 14.2x | 2.35x |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR and Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR is designed for versatility with a broad zoom range, while the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC offers a constant aperture ideal for low-light photography. The Nikon lens is priced at $1,296.95, making it a premium option for photographers seeking a super zoom lens. In contrast, the Sigma lens is about 29% cheaper at $919.00, catering to those who prefer a more budget-friendly choice without sacrificing quality.
Focal Length and Zoom Range
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm lens boasts a remarkable 14.2x zoom range, covering focal lengths from 28mm to 400mm. This extensive range makes it suitable for various photography scenarios, including wildlife and sports. The Sigma 17-40mm, on the other hand, offers a fixed focal range of 17mm to 40mm, which is ideal for landscapes, portraits, and travel photography. While the Nikon provides incredible versatility, the Sigma excels in specific applications where a wider aperture and shorter focal lengths are beneficial.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
When it comes to aperture and low-light performance, the Sigma 17-40mm shines with a bright constant F1.8 aperture. This feature allows for better performance in dim lighting situations and enables creative depth-of-field effects. The Nikon NIKKOR Z lens has a variable aperture that ranges from f/4 to f/8, which may limit its effectiveness in low-light conditions compared to the Sigma. For photographers who prioritize shooting in low light, the Sigma lens may offer a distinct advantage.
Build Quality and Portability
The Nikon lens weighs approximately 1.6 lbs (725 g) and is designed to be the lightest in its class, making it easy to carry around. The Sigma lens's specific weight is not provided, but it is typically heavier due to its robust build aimed at professional use. The Nikon's compact design makes it a great choice for travel and handheld shooting, whereas the Sigma, being part of the Art series, often emphasizes a sturdier construction, which may add weight but typically enhances durability.
Image Stabilization Features
The Nikon NIKKOR Z offers stable VR performance equivalent to a 5.0-stop increase in shutter speed, which is crucial for reducing blurriness in low-light conditions or when shooting handheld. This stabilization can be enhanced to 5.5 stops when paired with compatible cameras, making it advantageous for dynamic shooting environments. The Sigma lens lacks explicit stabilization features but is designed to deliver high-quality optics that can help produce sharp images even in challenging conditions.
Ideal Use Cases
The Nikon NIKKOR Z lens is exceptionally versatile, making it ideal for a wide range of situations, from sports to wildlife and travel photography. Its broad zoom range allows photographers to adapt quickly to different subjects without needing to switch lenses. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm is particularly well-suited for portrait and travel photography, where its wide aperture and shorter focal lengths can create stunning images with beautiful bokeh effects. Each lens caters to distinct photography styles, making them suitable for different audiences.
Price Comparison
In terms of pricing, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm is available for $1,296.95, while the Sigma 17-40mm is priced at $919.00. This makes the Sigma lens about $377.95 cheaper, representing a savings of approximately 29%. For budget-conscious photographers or those just starting, the Sigma presents a more accessible option, while the Nikon offers advanced features that may justify the higher price for serious enthusiasts and professionals.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you require versatility and a wide zoom range for various shooting scenarios, the Nikon lens is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance and a more budget-friendly option for portrait and travel photography, the Sigma lens is the way to go. Both lenses have unique strengths, making the decision about personal preference and intended use the key factor in your final choice.

