vsversusfinder

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- vs Tamron 18-

Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- wins on weight and length, Tamron 18- wins on price.

The Nikon lens offers superior telephoto capabilities and stabilization, while the Tamron lens provides excellent value for budget-conscious photographers.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 28- is better

Telephoto Reach

Nikon lens has a focal length of 28mm to 400mm.

Stabilization

Nikon lens offers up to 5.5-stop stabilization.

Weight

Nikon lens is lighter at 1.6 lbs.

Why Tamron 18- is better

Price

Tamron lens is priced at $599.

Zoom Ratio

Tamron lens has a 16.6x zoom.

Compact Size

Tamron lens is more compact at 4.9 x 2.9 inches.

Overall score

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-
85
Tamron 18-
72

Specifications

SpecNikon NIKKOR Z 28-Tamron 18-
Focal Length28-400mm18-300mm
Max Aperturef/4-8f/3.5-6.3
Zoom Ratio14.2x16.6x
AutofocusLinear MF DriveVXD Motor
StabilizationVRVC

Dimension comparison

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-Tamron 18-

Overview of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm and Tamron 18-300mm Lenses

When it comes to versatile camera lenses, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Mirrorless Lens and the Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Lens for Sony E APS-C mirrorless cameras offer distinct advantages. The Nikon lens is priced at $1,296.95, while the Tamron lens is approximately $599.00, making it about 54% cheaper. This significant price difference may influence your choice depending on your budget and shooting style.

Focal Length and Zoom Range

The Nikon lens offers a broad focal length range of 28mm to 400mm, providing a remarkable 14.2x zoom capability. This makes it ideal for a variety of shooting scenarios, from wide landscapes to distant wildlife. In contrast, the Tamron lens features a focal length of 18mm to 300mm, translating to a 16.6x zoom ratio. Although the Tamron lens covers a slightly wider angle in its range, the Nikon lens excels in telephoto reach, making it better suited for subjects at a distance.

Autofocus and Performance

Both lenses have advanced autofocus systems, but they cater to different needs. The Nikon lens boasts stable VR performance that is equivalent to a 5.0-stop increase in shutter speed, significantly reducing blurring during hand-held shooting. It also features a linear MF drive for smooth focusing, beneficial for video shooting. On the other hand, the Tamron lens utilizes a VXD linear motor focus mechanism, delivering fast and precise autofocus that excels in both still and video modes. If you prioritize video performance, the Nikon might be the better choice, while the Tamron offers impressive speed for still photography.

Size and Weight

In terms of portability, the Nikon lens weighs approximately 1.6 lbs (725 g) and measures about 5.57 inches in length. This makes it the lightest lens in its class, which is a vital consideration for photographers on the move. The Tamron lens, while slightly heavier at 21.9 ounces, is compact with dimensions of 4.9 x 2.9 inches. Although both lenses are relatively portable, the Nikon lens has a slight edge in weight, making it easier to carry during long shoots or travel.

Image Stabilization

Image stabilization is crucial for capturing sharp images, especially in low-light situations. The Nikon lens features VR technology that can effectively reduce blurring in dim lighting. When combined with a compatible camera, it can achieve up to 5.5-stop stabilization, making it an excellent choice for dynamic environments. The Tamron lens is equipped with Vibration Compensation (VC), which also reduces image blur caused by camera shake. While both lenses excel in stabilization, the Nikon lens offers slightly superior performance in this area, especially for hand-held shooting.

Build Quality and Features

Both lenses are designed with durability in mind. The Nikon lens is built for all-weather use, ensuring reliability in various conditions. It also supports advanced features like Synchro VR for enhanced stabilization during video shooting. The Tamron lens boasts moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, which helps repel water and dirt. While both lenses are built to withstand the elements, the choice may come down to specific environmental needs; the Tamron lens has added features for those concerned about moisture.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two lenses is substantial, with the Tamron lens priced at $599 and the Nikon lens at $1,296.95. This means the Tamron lens is about 54% less expensive than the Nikon lens. For budget-conscious photographers or those just starting, the Tamron lens offers a compelling value with its extensive zoom range and features at a significantly lower price point. However, the Nikon lens may justify its higher cost with its superior telephoto reach and advanced stabilization features.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm and the Tamron 18-300mm lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a lens with extensive telephoto capabilities and advanced stabilization for video, the Nikon lens may be worth the investment. However, if you are looking for a versatile, all-in-one lens that is significantly more affordable, the Tamron lens stands out as an excellent choice, providing exceptional performance in a variety of shooting scenarios.