Nikon NIKKOR Z vs Sigma
Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on size and weight, Sigma wins on price and low-light.
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 offers great value and versatility, while the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 excels in low-light performance and wider angles.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better
Price
Nikon is significantly cheaper at $276.95.
Portability
Nikon is more compact and lightweight.
Customization
Nikon offers a custom control ring for personalized settings.
Why Sigma is better
Low-Light
Sigma's f/1.4 aperture provides superior low-light performance.
Wide Angle
Sigma's 16mm focal length is ideal for landscapes.
Autofocus
Sigma features fast hybrid autofocus for smooth video.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon NIKKOR Z | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.4 |
| Compatibility | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Focal Length | 40mm | 16mm |
| Weight | 0.77 lbs | 0.88 lbs |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is priced at $276.95, while the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN is significantly more expensive at $539.00, making it about 95% pricier than the Nikon lens. Both lenses are designed for different camera systems and cater to different photographic needs, but they stand out in their own right with unique features and benefits.
Compatibility and Intended Use
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is specifically designed for FX and DX format Nikon Z series mirrorless cameras, providing a versatile 40mm view. This lens is suitable for a variety of photography styles, including street photography and portraits, making it a great all-rounder for Nikon users. In contrast, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN is tailored for Sony E mount cameras and excels in nature and event photography. This lens's wide-angle perspective is ideal for capturing expansive landscapes and dynamic scenes, offering a different utility for users of Sony cameras.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
When it comes to aperture, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 boasts a larger maximum aperture of f/1.4, which provides superior low-light performance compared to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2. The Sigma's f/1.4 aperture allows for greater light intake, enabling photographers to capture clearer images in dim environments. The Nikon's f/2 aperture is still impressive, delivering excellent subject/background separation and a beautiful bokeh effect, but it cannot match the low-light capabilities of the Sigma, making it less suitable for evening or indoor photography.
Autofocus System
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 features a fast and quiet autofocus system that significantly reduces focus breathing, ensuring smooth transitions while recording video. This makes it an excellent choice for videographers seeking precision and subtlety in their shots. On the other hand, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 also accommodates fast hybrid autofocus, making it well-suited for both stills and video. The stepping motor in the Sigma ensures smooth autofocus during video recording, providing an edge for users who prioritize fluid video performance.
Size and Portability
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a compact and lightweight lens, making it easy to carry around for daily photography. This portability is a significant advantage for street photographers who need to be discreet and mobile. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4, while also designed to be compact, is slightly bulkier due to its larger glass elements necessary for the wider aperture. Therefore, while both lenses are portable, the Nikon might appeal more to those prioritizing minimalism in their gear.
Customization and Control
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 features a custom control ring that allows photographers to personalize their shooting experience, whether it’s for manual focusing or adjusting aperture, ISO, or exposure compensation. This degree of customization can be particularly beneficial for creative photographers looking to have more control over their settings. In contrast, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is designed for simplicity and efficiency, focusing on delivering high-quality images rather than extensive user customization.
Background Blur and Bokeh Quality
Both lenses excel in producing attractive background blur, but they achieve this in different ways. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 employs a 9-blade diaphragm that enhances the natural bokeh effect, making it ideal for portrait photography where subject isolation is key. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its larger aperture, also provides beautiful bokeh, particularly useful in landscape shots where foreground elements can be emphasized against blurred backgrounds. Ultimately, photographers looking for a specific bokeh quality might prefer one lens over the other based on how they plan to use it.
Price Comparison
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is currently available for $276.95, which is about 51% less expensive than the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 priced at $539.00. This significant price difference could be a deciding factor for many photographers, especially those who are budget-conscious or just starting in photography. While Sigma's lens offers advanced features and better low-light performance, the Nikon lens provides excellent value and versatility at a more accessible price.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN ultimately depends on your camera system, shooting style, and budget. If you are a Nikon user looking for a versatile, lightweight lens with a good balance of features at a lower price, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a fantastic choice. However, if you are using a Sony camera and require superior low-light performance and a wider angle for expansive shots, the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is worth the investment despite its higher price.

