vsversusfinder

Nikon NIKKOR Z vs Tamron

Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on focal length and weight, Tamron wins on aperture and magnification.

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 excels in portrait photography with its fast aperture and beautiful bokeh, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 offers great value and portability for wide-angle shots.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better

Aperture

Nikon has a wider f/2 aperture for better bokeh.

Autofocus

Nikon features a fast and quiet autofocus system.

Image Quality

Nikon excels in portrait and street photography.

Why Tamron is better

Price

Tamron is about 28% cheaper.

Weight

Tamron is lighter at 7.6 oz.

Close-up

Tamron has a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio.

Overall score

Nikon NIKKOR Z
85
Tamron
77

Specifications

SpecNikon NIKKOR ZTamron
BrandNikonTamron
Max Aperturef/2f/2.8
AutofocusYesYes
Weather SealingNoYes
Field of View60mm24mm

Dimension comparison

Nikon NIKKOR ZTamron

Overview of the Lenses

When it comes to choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2, both lenses offer unique benefits for photographers. The Nikon lens is priced at $276.95, while the Tamron lens comes in at a more budget-friendly $199.00, making it about 28% cheaper than its Nikon counterpart. Both lenses cater to different shooting styles and needs, so it's essential to delve into their features and capabilities.

Compatibility and Use Cases

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is designed exclusively for Nikon’s Z series mirrorless cameras, making it a perfect companion for photographers using this system. It offers a versatile field of view, equivalent to 60mm on DX-format cameras, which is suitable for a variety of shooting scenarios, from street photography to portraiture. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is compatible with Sony full-frame and APS-C E-Mount mirrorless cameras, making it an excellent option for a broader audience of Sony users. The 24mm focal length is ideal for landscapes and urban scenes, providing a wide-angle perspective that can capture expansive vistas effectively.

Aperture and Depth of Field

In terms of aperture, the Nikon lens boasts a maximum f/2 aperture, allowing for excellent subject/background separation and a beautiful bokeh effect thanks to its 9 rounded blade diaphragm. This shallow depth of field is particularly appealing for portrait and street photography. On the other hand, the Tamron lens has a slightly narrower f/2.8 aperture. While it still provides a decent bokeh, it may not achieve the same level of background blur as the Nikon. However, the Tamron's design is optimized for close-up shots with a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio, giving it an edge for macro-style photography.

Autofocus Performance

The autofocus system is another critical factor to consider. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 features a fast and quiet autofocus mechanism that minimizes focus breathing, which can be particularly beneficial for video recording. This near-silent autofocus makes it an ideal choice for candid photography or situations where noise is a concern. In comparison, while specific autofocus details for the Tamron lens are not explicitly highlighted, it is designed to deliver sharp images across the frame, making it reliable for various shooting conditions.

Design and Portability

When it comes to design, the Tamron lens has a compact and lightweight build, measuring just 2.5 inches in length and weighing 7.6 ounces. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who prioritize portability, especially during all-day shooting adventures. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, while still relatively compact, does not match the Tamron's lightweight characteristics. This difference in weight and size may influence the decision for photographers who frequently travel or shoot on the go.

Durability and Weather Resistance

The Tamron lens edges out in terms of durability, featuring a moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating that resists dirt, enabling outdoor use under varying conditions. This makes it a reliable choice for outdoor photographers who may encounter less-than-ideal weather. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 does not explicitly mention similar weather sealing, which could be a consideration for those who frequently shoot in challenging environments.

Image Quality and Performance

Both lenses are designed for optical performance, but they cater to different needs. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 excels in portrait and street photography, thanks to its fast aperture and ability to create stunning bokeh. This lens promises excellent subject separation and is ideal for creative storytelling through imagery. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is specifically crafted for wide-angle photography, making it perfect for capturing landscapes and urban scenes with sharp detail across the frame. Its design minimizes aberrations, resulting in high-quality images that are visually appealing.

Which should you buy?

The choice between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 ultimately depends on your specific needs and camera compatibility. If you are a Nikon Z series user looking for a fast prime lens with a beautiful bokeh effect and excellent autofocus performance, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a compelling option. However, if you shoot with a Sony mirrorless camera and prefer a versatile wide-angle lens that is lightweight and designed for various shooting styles, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is about 28% cheaper and offers great value for your photography adventures.