Nikon NIKKOR Z vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on build and focal length, VILTROX wins on price and aperture.
The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 E offers superior low-light performance and is more budget-friendly, making it the better choice for many photographers. However, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is a solid option for Nikon users seeking versatility.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better
Brand Reputation
Nikon is a well-established brand in the camera industry.
Build Quality
Nikon lens is designed for durability.
Focal Length
40mm provides a versatile focal length.
Why VILTROX is better
Price
VILTROX is significantly cheaper.
Aperture
f/1.7 allows for better low-light performance.
Weight
VILTROX is lighter at 170g.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Nikon NIKKOR Z | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 40mm | 35mm |
| Weight | 0.4kg | 0.17kg |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Compatibility | Nikon Z | Sony E |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Lenses
When choosing a lens for your camera, two compelling options are the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 E. The Nikon lens is priced at $276.95, while the VILTROX lens is more budget-friendly at $179.00, making it about 35% less expensive. Both lenses are designed for different camera systems, with the Nikon catering specifically to Z series mirrorless cameras and the VILTROX serving those with Sony E mounts. The differences in aperture, focal length, and other features can significantly affect your photographic experience.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
A key distinction between the two lenses is their maximum aperture. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm offers a maximum aperture of f/2, while the VILTROX 35mm shines with a f/1.7 aperture. This larger aperture in the VILTROX lens allows for better low-light performance and creates a more pronounced background blur, ideal for portraits and street photography. Photographers looking to capture stunning images in challenging lighting conditions may find the VILTROX lens more appealing for its ability to gather more light.
Focal Length and Versatility
In terms of focal length, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm provides a versatile view that translates to a 60mm equivalent on DX-format cameras, making it suitable for a range of photography styles—from landscapes to candid portraits. The VILTROX 35mm, on the other hand, offers a natural perspective similar to the human eye. This can be especially beneficial for those who prioritize realism in their photography. The slight difference in focal lengths may influence your choice, depending on whether you prefer a wider or slightly tighter shot.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance is another area where the two lenses diverge. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm features a fast and quiet autofocus system that minimizes focus breathing, providing smooth transitions in video recordings. The VILTROX 35mm also boasts fast autofocus, utilizing a new STM motor for precise and near-silent operation. While both lenses excel in this area, the VILTROX's additional mention of low focus breathing may cater to videographers seeking seamless focus transitions.
Design and Build Quality
When it comes to design, both lenses are compact and lightweight, but they cater to different users. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm is designed as a durable and versatile option for Nikon Z series users, while the VILTROX 35mm is specifically tailored for portability, weighing only 170g. The VILTROX lens also features a USB-C upgrade port, allowing for easy firmware updates to maintain compatibility with new camera models. This thoughtful design element could make the VILTROX more appealing to photographers who prioritize longevity and adaptability.
Bokeh and Background Blur
The quality of background blur, or bokeh, is critical for many photographers, especially those focusing on portraits. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm, with its f/2 aperture, achieves a pleasing bokeh effect thanks to its 9 rounded blade diaphragm, providing a soft and natural separation between the subject and background. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 35mm's larger f/1.7 aperture allows for even more pronounced background blur, resulting in images with exceptional depth and focus on the subject. Those who prioritize artistic background effects may gravitate toward the VILTROX for its superior bokeh capabilities.
Price Comparison and Value
The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm is priced at $276.95, whereas the VILTROX 35mm comes in at $179.00, making it approximately $97.95 cheaper. This price difference can be significant for both amateur and professional photographers, particularly those on a budget. While both lenses offer unique features and capabilities, the VILTROX stands out as a more economical option without sacrificing essential performance, especially for those who might be just starting their photography journey.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 E ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a lens for a Nikon Z series camera with a slightly wider focal length, the Nikon lens is a solid choice. However, if you are looking for superior low-light performance, pronounced bokeh, and a more budget-friendly option, the VILTROX lens would be the better pick. Both lenses excel in their own right, so consider what features matter most to you before making a decision.

