vsversusfinder

Nikon NIKKOR Z vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on weight and build, VILTROX wins on size and portability.

The VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 offers better low-light performance and is more budget-friendly, making it a great choice for many photographers. However, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 excels in build quality and compatibility with Nikon cameras.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better

Build Quality

Nikon's lens is designed specifically for Z series cameras.

Control Features

Custom control ring for versatile shooting.

Background Blur

Natural bokeh effect with 9 blade diaphragm.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

VILTROX is 35% cheaper than Nikon.

Aperture

Larger f/1.7 aperture for low-light performance.

Optical Design

11 elements for superior image quality.

Overall score

Nikon NIKKOR Z
85
VILTROX
90

Specifications

SpecNikon NIKKOR ZVILTROX
Aperturef/2f/1.7
Focal Length40mm35mm
AutofocusFast & QuietFast & Precise
Minimum Focus0.3m0.33m
BokehNaturalPronounced

Dimension comparison

Nikon NIKKOR ZVILTROX

Introduction

When it comes to choosing a prime lens, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji stand out as excellent options. Each lens caters to different needs and camera systems, making the decision more nuanced than just price or brand. In this comparison, we’ll explore their features, performance, and value to help you determine which lens best suits your photography style.

Price Comparison

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is priced at $276.95, while the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji comes in at a more budget-friendly $179.00. This makes the VILTROX lens about 35% cheaper than its Nikon counterpart, offering significant savings for photographers who are budget-conscious. The lower price of the VILTROX may appeal to those starting in photography or those looking to expand their lens collection without breaking the bank.

Compatibility

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is designed specifically for Nikon's Z series mirrorless cameras, compatible with both FX and DX formats. When mounted on DX-format cameras, it provides a field of view equivalent to 60mm, making it versatile for various shooting scenarios. On the other hand, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji is engineered for Fujifilm's X-Mount cameras, including popular models like the X-T1, X-T10, and X-T4. This specialization ensures that each lens integrates seamlessly with its respective camera system, maximizing performance and functionality.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm boasts a maximum aperture of f/2, which allows for beautiful background blur and decent low-light performance. However, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 shines in this area with its larger aperture, allowing for exceptional low-light capability and an even more pronounced bokeh effect. This makes the VILTROX a better choice for photographers who frequently shoot in challenging light conditions, such as during events or in dimly lit environments.

Autofocus Technology

Both lenses feature advanced autofocus systems, but they cater to different user needs. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 has a fast and quiet autofocus that efficiently suppresses focus breathing, which is crucial for video recording. This means that videographers can achieve smooth transitions without noticeable shifts in framing. Conversely, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 is equipped with a new STM motor, delivering fast and precise autofocus along with low focus breathing. This makes it a strong contender for both photographers and videographers alike.

Optical Design

In terms of optical quality, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 features an impressive design with 11 elements arranged in 9 groups, including specialized elements to minimize chromatic aberrations and distortion. This meticulous design promises sharp, vivid images across various shooting scenarios. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, while also delivering excellent image quality, focuses more on delivering a natural bokeh and subject/background separation rather than advanced optical engineering. The choice between them may come down to whether you prioritize optical complexity or bokeh effects in your photography.

Usability and Design

Both lenses are designed with user experience in mind. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm features a custom control ring that photographers can assign to manual focus, aperture, ISO, or exposure compensation, enhancing shooting flexibility. The VILTROX 35mm, on the other hand, includes thoughtful design details such as an extended lens hood and a USB-C upgrade port for firmware updates, ensuring it remains compatible with future camera models. This user-friendly approach may appeal to photographers who value longevity and adaptability in their equipment.

Portability

Portability can be a crucial aspect for photographers who often travel or shoot on location. The compact and lightweight design of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm makes it an excellent choice for street photography and casual shoots. Similarly, the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 is designed to be lightweight, allowing for easy handling and transport. Both lenses are manageable for extended periods of shooting, making them suitable for various photography styles.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, your choice between the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 and the VILTROX 35mm f/1.7 Fuji should hinge on your specific needs and camera system. If you prioritize a larger aperture for low-light shooting and bokeh, the VILTROX is the clear winner, especially at a price that is about 35% less than the Nikon. However, if you're a Nikon Z series user looking for solid performance and a versatile focal length, the NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 is an excellent choice. Ultimately, both lenses offer unique advantages that can enhance your photography, depending on your style and requirements.