vsversusfinder

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12- vs Sigma 17-

Updated July 2026 — Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12- wins on stabilization and weight, Sigma 17- wins on price and aperture.

The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR offers better value and versatility for casual users, while the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC excels in low-light performance and image quality.

Why Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12- is better

Price

Nikon is significantly cheaper at $366.95 compared to Sigma's $919.00.

Weight

Nikon is more lightweight and portable.

Zoom Feature

Nikon offers a power zoom with 11 speeds.

Why Sigma 17- is better

Aperture

Sigma has a constant F1.8 aperture for low-light shooting.

Optical Quality

Sigma is part of the Art series, known for superior image quality.

Build Quality

Sigma emphasizes durability and professional-grade construction.

Overall score

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-
75
Sigma 17-
85

Specifications

SpecNikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-Sigma 17-
BrandNikonSigma
Current Price$366.95$919.00
Aperturef/3.5-5.6F1.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
Zoom Range12-28mm17-40mm
Target AudienceCasual UsersProfessionals

Dimension comparison

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-Sigma 17-

Price Comparison

The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR is significantly more affordable than the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC. Priced at $366.95, the Nikon lens is about 60% cheaper than the Sigma lens, which retails for $919.00. This price difference makes it an attractive option for photographers on a budget or those looking for a versatile lens without a hefty investment. The Sigma lens, while more expensive, potentially offers features that justify its price for specific use cases, particularly for those who need a higher quality lens for serious photography or videography.

Versatility in Usage

In terms of versatility, the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR stands out with its ultra-wide-angle zoom range. This lens allows for immersive shots from 12mm to a more natural 28mm perspective, making it ideal for content creators and vloggers. The power zoom feature, which offers 11 different speeds, gives users creative control during shooting. Meanwhile, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC, while also versatile, is designed primarily for portraits, travel, and video, making it less adaptable than the Nikon lens for a variety of shooting scenarios.

Image Stabilization

The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR excels in image stabilization, featuring a built-in VR (Vibration Reduction) system that combats camera shake by up to 4.5 stops. This is particularly beneficial for handheld shooting in challenging conditions, allowing for steadier images and video. On the other hand, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC does not mention any form of image stabilization, which may impact its performance in low-light scenarios or when capturing fast-moving subjects. The absence of stabilization in the Sigma lens could require users to rely on faster shutter speeds or tripod use to avoid blur.

Aperture and Low Light Performance

The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC features a bright constant aperture of F1.8, which is advantageous for low-light photography and creating depth of field effects. This capability can be a game-changer for photographers who frequently shoot in dim lighting or want to achieve a more pronounced subject isolation. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR has a variable aperture of f/3.5-5.6, which is less favorable for low-light conditions. This characteristic makes the Sigma lens more suited for artistic photography that requires shallow depth of field and better performance in darker environments.

Build Quality and Design

Both lenses are designed with their respective camera systems in mind, but the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR is noted for its compact and lightweight design, making it gimbal-friendly and ideal for on-the-go shooting. The Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC, being part of the Art series, emphasizes build quality and optical performance, which may appeal to professionals looking for durability and reliability in their equipment. However, the Nikon lens's lightweight nature provides a significant advantage for vloggers and creators who need to travel light.

Target Audience

The Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR is particularly targeted toward content creators, vloggers, and casual photographers who require a flexible lens for a variety of shooting situations. Its features are designed to accommodate those who prioritize ease of use and versatility. In contrast, the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC is aimed at enthusiasts and professionals who demand higher image quality and performance, especially in low-light situations, making it better suited for portrait photography and serious videography.

Availability and Market Position

Both lenses are available for their respective camera systems, but the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR may have a broader appeal due to its lower price point and versatile features. Although specific sales ranks are not provided, the Nikon lens's affordability may lead to higher sales volume among budget-conscious consumers. The Sigma lens, while potentially offering superior optical quality, caters to a niche market of serious photographers willing to invest more for premium performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm PZ VR and the Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for a versatile, lightweight lens that is budget-friendly and excels in video and casual photography, the Nikon lens is the clear choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, artistic depth of field, and professional image quality, the Sigma lens may justify its higher price with its superior features. For content creators and vloggers, the Nikon is an excellent investment, while serious photographers may find the Sigma meets their higher standards.