vsversusfinder

Nikon Z f | Full-Frame Mirrorless Stills/Video vs OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 Silver Micro Four Thirds

Updated August 2026 — Nikon Z f | Full-Frame Mirrorless Stills/Video wins on design and build, OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 Silver Micro Four Thirds wins on weight and size.

The Nikon Z f excels in image quality and advanced features, while the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 offers portability and weather sealing at a lower price.

Why Nikon Z f | Full-Frame Mirrorless Stills/Video is better

Image Quality

Nikon Z f has a higher resolution sensor (24.5MP vs 20MP)

Autofocus

Nikon Z f features advanced 3D Tracking for better subject tracking

Video Capabilities

Nikon Z f supports 4K/30p recording oversampled from 6K

Why OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 Silver Micro Four Thirds is better

Portability

OM-3 is more compact and lightweight for travel

Weather Sealing

OM-3 has an IP53 rating for dust and water resistance

Price

OM-3 is priced lower at $1699.99 compared to $2046.95

Overall score

Nikon Z f | Full-Frame Mirrorless Stills/Video
88
OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 Silver Micro Four Thirds
76

Specifications

SpecNikon Z f | Full-Frame Mirrorless Stills/VideoOM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 Silver Micro Four Thirds
Sensor24.5MP BSI20MP BSI
Video4K/30pS&Q Mode
Autofocus3D TrackingFocus Stacking
Weather SealingNoIP53
Touchscreen3.2-inNo

Dimension comparison

Nikon Z f | Full-Frame Mirrorless Stills/VideoOM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 Silver Micro Four Thirds

Overview of the Nikon Z f and OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3

The Nikon Z f is priced at $2046.95, while the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 is available for $1699.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the Nikon model. Both cameras cater to photography enthusiasts but target slightly different needs and preferences. The Nikon Z f is a full-frame mirrorless camera, while the Olympus OM-3 employs a Micro Four Thirds system, which can affect the performance in various shooting situations, including low-light conditions and size.

Design and Build Quality

The Nikon Z f features an iconic styling with a premium feel, offering depth and tactile handling that many photographers appreciate. Its build is designed for those who value aesthetics and functionality, while the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 presents a vintage-styled premium metal body, enhancing its appeal for those who prefer a classical touch. The OM-3 also boasts an IP53 rating, ensuring it is dustproof, splashproof, and freezeproof, making it a robust option for travel and outdoor use.

Image Quality and Sensor Performance

The Nikon Z f is equipped with a 24.5MP BSI full-frame sensor, which delivers exceptional image quality, depth, and dynamic range. In contrast, the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 features a 20MP stacked BSI Live MOS sensor. While the Z f has a higher resolution, the OM-3 utilizes features like computational photography, which can enhance image quality and creative options. Each camera offers unique strengths, but for sheer resolution, the Nikon Z f takes the lead.

Autofocus and Tracking Capabilities

The Nikon Z f excels in autofocus performance with its advanced 3D Tracking system, recognizing nine different subjects for accurate focus and tracking. This is particularly beneficial for capturing fast-moving subjects, making it a strong choice for action photography. The OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3, while not explicitly detailed in its autofocus capabilities, includes features like Focus Stacking, which allows for creative control over depth of field. Those who prioritize speed and accuracy may prefer the Nikon model.

Video Recording Features

In terms of video capabilities, the Nikon Z f offers impressive 4K/30p recording oversampled from 6K, with options for 1080/120p slow motion. This makes it a versatile choice for videographers looking for high-quality footage. On the other hand, the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 has a unique S&Q mode for slow motion and quick motion videos, allowing for creative storytelling. However, the Z f's higher resolution and frame rate make it the better option for serious video production.

User Interface and Controls

The Nikon Z f features a 3.2-inch vari-angle touchscreen, which includes a new Touch Fn functionality. This allows photographers to move focus points and select subjects to track with ease while using the viewfinder. The OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 offers a 2.36m-dot OLED electronic viewfinder and a creative dial for various profile controls and filters. While both cameras provide user-friendly interfaces, the versatility of the Z f's touchscreen may enhance the shooting experience for many users.

Size and Portability

The OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3, being a Micro Four Thirds camera, is generally more compact and lightweight compared to the Nikon Z f. This makes it a great option for travel photographers who prioritize portability without sacrificing performance. The Nikon Z f, while offering superior image quality and features, may be bulkier and heavier, which could be a consideration for those on the go. For users who frequently travel or hike, the Olympus might be the more convenient choice.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Nikon Z f and the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize image quality, advanced autofocus, and video capabilities, the Nikon Z f may be worth the higher price at $2046.95. However, if you seek a more portable, weather-sealed camera that delivers strong performance for travel and creative photography at a lower price of $1699.99, the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-3 presents a compelling option. Both cameras have their unique strengths, making them suitable for different types of photographers.