nutribullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W – vs Oster® Classic Series 8-Speed Blender with 6-Cup
Updated August 2026 — nutribullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W – leads on versatility and cleaning.
The NutriBullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W outperforms the Oster Classic Series 8-Speed Blender in power and versatility, making it the better choice for serious blending tasks.
Why nutribullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W – is better
Power
NutriBullet has a 1200W motor compared to Oster's 700W
Versatility
NutriBullet includes both a multi-serving pitcher and a single-serve cup
Ease of Cleaning
NutriBullet components are dishwasher safe
Why Oster® Classic Series 8-Speed Blender with 6-Cup is better
Price
Oster is significantly cheaper at $48.85
Durability
Oster features a glass jar for sturdiness
Simplicity
Oster is easier for basic blending tasks
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | nutribullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W – | Oster® Classic Series 8-Speed Blender with 6-Cup |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Power | 1200W | 700W |
| Jar Material | Plastic | Glass |
| Speed Settings | 3 | 8 |
| Ice Crushing | No | Yes |
| Dishwasher Safe | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the NutriBullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W and Oster Classic Series 8-Speed Blender
The NutriBullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W is significantly more powerful than the Oster Classic Series 8-Speed Blender, which could impact your blending experience. The NutriBullet features a robust 1200-watt motor designed for serious blending, while the Oster’s motor offers 700 watts. This difference in power means that the NutriBullet can tackle tougher ingredients and produce smoother blends more efficiently.
Both blenders have their strengths, but their different power levels and functionalities cater to distinct needs. The NutriBullet is ideal for those who prioritize nutrient extraction and versatility, while the Oster offers a more straightforward option for everyday blending tasks.
Performance Comparison
When it comes to performance, the NutriBullet clearly stands out with its 1200 watts of power, allowing it to handle a wide range of ingredients from smoothies to nut butters with ease. In contrast, the Oster's 700-watt motor is competent but may struggle with tougher items. The NutriBullet features three precision speeds and a pulse function, giving users better control over their blending tasks.
On the other hand, the Oster includes an ice-crushing button and a Duralast™ All Metal Drive, which enhances its durability for everyday use. While it may not match the NutriBullet in power, it is still capable of producing smoothies, soups, and salsas efficiently.
Design and Build Quality
The NutriBullet's design includes a multi-serving pitcher and a single-serve cup, making it versatile for both large batches and personal servings. Its BPA-free plastic construction is durable and easy to clean, as the pitcher and cups are dishwasher safe. The sleek dark gray finish adds a modern touch to any kitchen.
Conversely, the Oster features a classic design with a 6-cup glass jar, which is not only aesthetically pleasing but also offers a sturdier option for blending. Glass jars can be preferable for those concerned about plastic wear, but they are heavier and more prone to breakage. The Oster's plastic base is complemented by its stainless steel blades, ensuring durability and efficient cutting.
Cleaning and Maintenance
In terms of cleaning, the NutriBullet has the upper hand as its components are dishwasher safe, simplifying post-use maintenance. Users can easily rinse the Easy-Twist Extractor Blade with soap and water, making it a hassle-free experience.
The Oster, while also manageable, requires a bit more effort, especially with its glass jar which needs to be handled carefully. The blades are also stainless steel, but the glass jar can be cumbersome and less convenient for quick cleaning, especially in busy kitchens.
Price Point Analysis
The NutriBullet is priced at $110.99, while the Oster is significantly cheaper at $48.85. This makes the Oster about 56% less expensive than the NutriBullet, which might appeal to budget-conscious consumers looking for reliable functionality without the need for advanced features.
However, the price difference reflects the capabilities and power of each blender. The NutriBullet’s higher price can be justified by its superior motor power and versatility, making it a worthwhile investment for those who blend frequently or require more advanced features.
User Experience
The NutriBullet has a bestseller rank of 1111, indicating a strong level of customer satisfaction and trust in its performance. Users appreciate its ability to produce smooth textures and its ease of use with multiple blending options.
The Oster, with a bestseller rank of 2803, still garners positive reviews for its straightforward operation and reliability for everyday blending tasks. It is particularly praised for its ability to crush ice and create consistent blends, making it suitable for casual users.
Versatility in Use
The NutriBullet excels in versatility, offering both a multi-serving pitcher and a single-serve cup, making it suitable for various blending needs, whether for family meals or personal smoothies. Its three precision speeds and Extract program cater to a range of recipes, from smoothies to sauces.
On the other hand, the Oster is designed primarily for basic blending tasks, with its eight-speed settings allowing for a range of textures but lacking the specialized features of the NutriBullet. It is ideal for users who need a reliable blender for everyday tasks without the complexity of multiple blending modes.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the NutriBullet Full-Size Blender Combo 1200W and the Oster Classic Series 8-Speed Blender ultimately depends on your blending needs and budget. If you require a powerful, versatile blender capable of handling a variety of ingredients and recipes, the NutriBullet is the clear choice despite its higher price. Conversely, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option for basic blending tasks, the Oster offers solid performance at a significantly lower cost.

