STARTRC PHOTO OM Magnetic Mount for DJI Osmo Mobile 8/7P/7 vs PICTRON Smartphone Video Rig PICTRON U200 Handheld LED
Updated July 2026 — PICTRON Smartphone Video Rig PICTRON U200 Handheld LED leads on battery and weight.
The OM Magnetic Mount offers a lightweight and affordable solution for stabilization, while the PICTRON U200 provides advanced lighting features for serious videographers.
Why STARTRC PHOTO OM Magnetic Mount for DJI Osmo Mobile 8/7P/7 is better
Price
OM Magnetic Mount is significantly cheaper.
Weight
OM Magnetic Mount is lighter at 41g.
Simplicity
OM Magnetic Mount offers straightforward usability.
Why PICTRON Smartphone Video Rig PICTRON U200 Handheld LED is better
Lighting
PICTRON U200 includes adjustable LED ring light.
Battery
PICTRON U200 has a built-in 8000mAh power bank.
Versatility
PICTRON U200 supports multiple devices and shooting orientations.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | STARTRC PHOTO OM Magnetic Mount for DJI Osmo Mobile 8/7P/7 | PICTRON Smartphone Video Rig PICTRON U200 Handheld LED |
|---|---|---|
| Stabilization | Good | Excellent |
| Lighting | No | Yes |
| Compatibility | MagSafe | Multi-device |
| Ease of Use | High | Medium |
| Portability | High | Medium |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The OM Magnetic Mount for DJI Osmo Mobile 8/7P/7 Gimbal Stabilizer is priced at $24.99, while the Smartphone Video Rig PICTRON U200 is significantly more expensive at $79.95. The price difference of $54.96 makes the OM Magnetic Mount about 69% cheaper than the PICTRON video rig. This stark contrast in pricing suggests that these products serve different segments of the market, catering to varying needs in the realm of smartphone videography.
Product Design and Usability
The OM Magnetic Mount features a double-sided magnetic design that allows users to attach their phone and the tracking module simultaneously. This design is specifically tailored for seamless ActiveTrack use with DJI's gimbal stabilizers. The retractable back cover extension also accommodates various phone sizes, enhancing usability. In contrast, the PICTRON U200 video rig boasts a versatile design that supports both horizontal and vertical shooting. It includes a built-in LED ring light, which enhances video quality but adds bulk to the setup. The usability of the OM Magnetic Mount is straightforward, focusing on quick attachment and detachment, while the PICTRON rig offers more complexity with its added features.
Functionality and Features
The OM Magnetic Mount is designed primarily for stabilization and easy attachment. It weighs only 41 grams and provides a secure hold for MagSafe iPhones and Android devices with an included magnetic ring. This feature allows for effortless setup, enabling users to quickly switch between shots. On the other hand, the PICTRON U200 focuses on lighting and multi-device compatibility, featuring a steplessly adjustable brightness and color temperature range of 2500K to 8500K. It also includes an 8000mAh battery that can function as a power bank. While both products enhance mobile videography, the OM Magnetic Mount excels in stabilization, while the PICTRON U200 enhances lighting and power capabilities.
Target Audience
The OM Magnetic Mount primarily targets mobile content creators who seek a lightweight and efficient solution for stabilization. Its straightforward design appeals to users who prioritize quick setups, especially for dynamic shooting environments. Conversely, the PICTRON U200 is targeted at more serious videographers who require advanced lighting solutions for vlogging, makeup tutorials, or professional filming. The enhanced features and higher price tag suggest that it is intended for users looking to invest in a more comprehensive video setup.
Performance in the Market
Currently, the OM Magnetic Mount has a sales rank of 18,002, indicating a moderate level of popularity in the market. In comparison, the PICTRON U200 ranks better at 12,019, suggesting it may be more appealing to consumers seeking a complete video rig with integrated lighting. The difference in sales rank could reflect the varying consumer preferences for simple stabilization versus more complex setups that include lighting features.
Portability and Convenience
Weighing only 41 grams, the OM Magnetic Mount is highly portable, making it easy to carry around for spontaneous shooting. Its compact design allows it to be set up quickly without any hassle. The PICTRON U200, while offering extensive features, is bulkier due to its integrated LED ring light and larger battery. This means that while it provides additional functionality, it may not be as convenient for on-the-go videographers who prefer a lightweight solution.
Price Considerations
The OM Magnetic Mount is available for $24.99, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers or those just starting in mobile filmmaking. In contrast, the PICTRON U200 is priced at $79.95, which is about 69% higher. While it offers more features like lighting and a larger battery, the price may deter entry-level users who are looking for a simple stabilization solution. The significant price difference could influence purchasing decisions, particularly for those who want to balance quality with affordability.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the OM Magnetic Mount for DJI Osmo Mobile and the PICTRON U200 video rig depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are focused on stabilization and portability without breaking the bank, the OM Magnetic Mount is an excellent choice. However, if you require advanced lighting features and are willing to invest more for improved video quality, the PICTRON U200 is worth considering. Each product has its unique strengths, and your decision should align with your videography goals.

