OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- vs OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED
Updated July 2026 — OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- wins on max aperture, OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED wins on price and weight.
The OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm lens offers versatility and affordability, while the 60mm macro lens excels in close-up photography and low-light performance.
Why OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- is better
Price
40-150mm lens is significantly cheaper at $175.99
Versatility
40-150mm lens covers a wider focal length range
Portability
40-150mm lens is designed for general photography
Why OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED is better
Close-Up
60mm macro lens offers 1:1 life-size magnification
Aperture
60mm macro lens has a bright f2.8 aperture
Weather Sealing
60mm macro lens is weather-sealed for durability
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- | OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom | 3.75x | Fixed |
| Weather Sealed | No | Yes |
| Minimum Focus | 1.5m | 0.19m |
| AF System | MSC | MSC + Limit |
| Image Quality | Good | Excellent |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Lenses
In comparing the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R Silver and the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro, the two lenses cater to different photography needs. The 40-150mm lens is designed for versatility in focal length and portability, while the 60mm macro lens excels in capturing fine details at close distances.
The 40-150mm lens offers a 3.75x zoom range, making it suitable for general photography, while the 60mm macro lens is specifically engineered for close-up work with a 1:1 life-size magnification. This fundamental difference in purpose sets the tone for what each lens can achieve in the field.
Price Comparison
The OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R Silver is priced at $175.99, making it about 68% cheaper than the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro, which retails for $549.99.
This significant price gap may be a deciding factor for photographers on a budget or those who do not require the specialized features of the macro lens. While the 60mm macro offers advanced capabilities for niche photography, the 40-150mm lens provides a more accessible entry point into quality optics.
Focal Length and Versatility
The focal length of a lens greatly influences its usability, and in this comparison, the 40-150mm lens outshines the 60mm macro in terms of versatility. The 40-150mm lens covers a focal length range from 40mm to 150mm, allowing photographers to capture a wide array of subjects from portraits to landscapes.
On the other hand, the 60mm macro lens has a fixed focal length of 60mm, which is optimal for close-up shots but limits its versatility in other photography scenarios. This aspect makes the 40-150mm lens more appealing for those who want a single lens capable of handling various shooting situations.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro features a bright f2.8 aperture, which is advantageous for low-light conditions and allows for more creative control over depth of field. In contrast, the 40-150mm lens has a maximum aperture range of F4.0 to F5.6, which may not perform as well in dim lighting.
For photographers who frequently shoot in low-light environments or want to achieve a shallow depth of field, the 60mm macro lens presents a clear advantage. However, the broader aperture range of the 40-150mm lens can still produce satisfactory results in well-lit conditions.
Close-Up Photography
When it comes to close-up photography, the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is the clear winner. This lens boasts a 1:1 life-size magnification and a minimum focusing distance of just 7.4 inches, allowing photographers to capture intricate details with remarkable clarity.
In contrast, the 40-150mm lens only offers a maximum image magnification of .16x, making it less suitable for macro photography. For enthusiasts interested in capturing small subjects such as insects or flowers, the 60mm macro lens is essential, whereas the 40-150mm lens is more suitable for general photography.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
The OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro features a weather-sealed design, providing added durability and reliability in various shooting environments. This makes it ideal for outdoor photography, where unpredictable weather conditions can pose challenges.
Conversely, the 40-150mm lens does not mention any weather-resistant features, which may be a drawback for users who often shoot in adverse weather. The weather-sealed construction of the 60mm macro lens offers peace of mind for photographers who need a dependable tool in challenging conditions.
Autofocus Performance
Both lenses utilize High-Speed Imager AF (MSC) for quick and accurate autofocus performance. However, the 60mm macro lens is equipped with a focus limit switch that speeds up auto focus when working within certain distances. This feature is particularly beneficial for macro photographers who often switch between subjects at varying distances.
The autofocus system in the 40-150mm lens is efficient but lacks the additional functionality offered by the macro lens. For users who prioritize fast and precise focus, especially in close-up scenarios, the 60mm macro lens may be the better option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R Silver and the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro ultimately depends on your photography needs. If versatility, affordability, and general photography applications are your priorities, the 40-150mm lens is an excellent choice at $175.99.
However, if you are focused on macro photography and require superior close-up capabilities with a bright f2.8 aperture, the 60mm macro lens, despite its higher price of $549.99, may be worth the investment. Each lens serves a distinct purpose, so aligning your choice with your specific photography goals will lead to the best outcome.

