vsversusfinder

OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- vs TTArtisan Auto Focus

Updated July 2026 — OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- wins on zoom and versatility, TTArtisan Auto Focus wins on weight and low-light.

The OM SYSTEM lens offers greater versatility and zoom capabilities, while the TTArtisan lens excels in low-light performance and is more budget-friendly.

Why OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40- is better

Zoom Range

OM SYSTEM lens has a 3.75x zoom compared to TTArtisan's fixed focal length.

Versatility

OM SYSTEM lens is suitable for various photography styles.

Price Justification

Higher price reflects its broader use cases.

Why TTArtisan Auto Focus is better

Low-Light

TTArtisan lens has a larger aperture for better low-light performance.

Compactness

TTArtisan lens is lighter and more portable.

Cost

TTArtisan lens is 29% cheaper.

Overall score

OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-
85
TTArtisan Auto Focus
75

Specifications

SpecOM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-TTArtisan Auto Focus
Focal Length40-150mm35mm
Max ApertureF4.0-5.6F1.8
AutofocusHigh-Speed AFAdvanced STM
Image QualityHighMedium
Build QualityGoodAverage

Dimension comparison

OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-TTArtisan Auto Focus

Overview of the Lenses

When comparing the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R Silver and the TTArtisan Auto Focus 35mm F1.8 Mark II, it’s essential to understand their target users and use cases. The Olympus lens is designed for Micro Four Thirds cameras and offers versatility with its 3.75x zoom range. In contrast, the TTArtisan lens is meant for APS-C cameras, providing a fixed focal length ideal for portraits and low-light conditions. The Olympus lens is priced at $175.99, while the TTArtisan lens is more budget-friendly at $125.00, making it about 29% cheaper.

Focal Length and Zoom Capabilities

The OM SYSTEM Olympus lens features a focal length of 40-150mm, allowing for a range of photography from medium telephoto to portrait shots. This flexibility means it can handle various scenarios, from landscapes to wildlife photography. The TTArtisan lens, with its fixed focal length of 35mm, translates to an equivalent full-frame focal length of 53mm. This makes it excellent for portrait photography but limits its versatility compared to the Olympus lens. Thus, if zoom capability is crucial for your photography style, the Olympus lens offers a significant advantage.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

In terms of maximum aperture, the TTArtisan lens has a larger aperture of F1.8 compared to the Olympus lens's maximum aperture range of F4.0-5.6. This difference means that the TTArtisan is better suited for low-light conditions, allowing for brighter images and the ability to achieve beautiful bokeh effects. Photographers who frequently shoot in dim environments or wish to create a shallow depth of field will likely find the TTArtisan lens more appealing. The Olympus lens, while not as adept in low-light situations, still performs well in various lighting conditions, making it a well-rounded option.

Autofocus Capabilities

The TTArtisan lens features advanced autofocus capabilities, utilizing the latest STM and lead screw-type stepping motor for smoother and quieter focusing. This innovation ensures precise and fast autofocus, which is particularly beneficial for candid or fast-moving subjects. On the other hand, the Olympus lens sports High-Speed Imager AF (MSC), designed to provide quick and accurate focusing as well. While both lenses offer good autofocus performance, the TTArtisan's advanced system may provide an edge in dynamic shooting situations, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize quick focusing.

Design and Portability

When considering design and portability, the TTArtisan lens is notably compact. Weighing in at 176g, it's lighter than the Olympus lens, which is beneficial for photographers who prioritize mobility. The reduced weight contributes to a more convenient shooting experience, especially during long sessions or when traveling. The Olympus lens, while also portable, may be slightly bulkier due to its zoom capabilities. Therefore, if compactness and ease of transport are essential factors for you, the TTArtisan lens stands out in this aspect.

Use Cases and Versatility

The OM SYSTEM Olympus lens shines in versatility, making it suitable for various photography styles, from wildlife to landscapes. Its zoom range is particularly advantageous for capturing different subjects without needing to change lenses frequently. Conversely, the TTArtisan lens is more specialized, excelling in portrait photography and close-up shots, thanks to its closer focusing distance of 0.4m. However, this specialization limits its adaptability for broader photographic needs. If you’re looking for an all-rounder lens, the Olympus lens may be the better choice, while the TTArtisan is ideal for those who primarily focus on portraits.

Price Point and Value

Price is a significant factor in any lens decision. The TTArtisan lens is priced at $125.00, making it about 29% cheaper than the Olympus lens at $175.99. This price difference can be an important consideration for amateur photographers or those just starting, as the TTArtisan lens offers solid performance without breaking the bank. However, the Olympus lens justifies its higher price through its versatility and zoom capabilities, which may appeal more to professional photographers or enthusiasts looking for a comprehensive lens solution.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R Silver and the TTArtisan Auto Focus 35mm F1.8 Mark II ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you require a versatile lens that can handle a variety of shooting scenarios, the Olympus lens is the better option with its 3.75x zoom range and adaptability. However, if you primarily focus on portrait photography and often shoot in low-light conditions, the TTArtisan lens, with its larger aperture and advanced autofocus features, presents a compelling choice, especially considering its lower price point.