OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED vs TTArtisan AF

Overview of the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro

The OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is a specialized lens designed for Micro Four Thirds cameras, featuring a weather-sealed design that allows for use in various conditions. Priced at $549.99, this lens is significantly more expensive than its competitor. It boasts a bright f2.8 aperture and a 60mm focal length that provides a 1:1 life-size magnification, making it ideal for capturing fine details in macro photography.

The lens incorporates advanced optical elements, including 13 separate lens elements in 10 groups, which work together to minimize chromatic aberrations and ensure high-quality image reproduction. Its internal focusing system prevents the lens length from changing when focusing, a critical feature for macro photography, allowing for a minimum focusing distance of about 7.4 inches.

Overview of the TTArtisan AF 56mm F1.8 Fuji XF

The TTArtisan AF 56mm F1.8 Fuji XF is a more affordable option, priced at $129.00, making it about 76% cheaper than the OM SYSTEM lens. This lens is designed specifically for Fujifilm X-Mount cameras and offers a large f1.8 aperture, which is beneficial for low-light photography and provides a soft bokeh effect.

The TTArtisan features a unique STM stepping motor for smooth and precise focusing, along with eye recognition focus technology, making it particularly suitable for portrait photography. The lens barrel is crafted from aviation aluminum, ensuring durability and a retro aesthetic that complements Fujifilm cameras. While it lacks the macro capabilities of the OM SYSTEM lens, its performance in general photography is commendable.

Price Comparison

When comparing prices, the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is priced at $549.99, while the TTArtisan AF 56mm F1.8 Fuji XF is available for $129.00. This puts the TTArtisan lens at a staggering $420.99 cheaper, or approximately 76% less expensive, making it a more accessible choice for photographers on a budget.

The price difference reflects the specialized nature of the OM SYSTEM lens, which is designed for macro photography with advanced features. In contrast, the TTArtisan lens offers great value for general portrait and everyday shooting, appealing to a wider range of photographers who may not require macro functionality.

Optical Performance

Optically, the OM SYSTEM lens excels with its 60mm focal length and f2.8 aperture, allowing for superb detail capture at close distances. The 1:1 magnification capability is especially beneficial for macro photography, enabling photographers to capture intricate details in subjects. The lens also features ZERO (Zuiko Extra-low Reflection Optical) coating, which helps to reduce lens flare and ghosting, ensuring high contrast and sharp images.

On the other hand, the TTArtisan lens, with its f1.8 aperture, allows for more light to enter, making it advantageous for low-light situations. Its STM motor offers smooth focusing, which is particularly useful for capturing moving subjects. However, the optical design is not specifically tailored for macro photography, limiting its performance in that area compared to the OM SYSTEM lens.

Build Quality and Design

In terms of build quality, the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro features a robust weather-sealed design that makes it resistant to dust and moisture, ideal for outdoor shooting. The internal focusing mechanism ensures that the lens does not extend during focusing, which is a significant advantage for macro work, where maintaining working distance is critical.

Conversely, the TTArtisan AF 56mm F1.8 Fuji XF is constructed from aviation aluminum, giving it a sturdy yet lightweight feel. The design is retro-styled, appealing to users who appreciate aesthetics. However, it lacks the weather-sealing features of the OM SYSTEM lens, making it less suitable for harsh conditions.

Autofocus Capabilities

The autofocus capabilities of the OM SYSTEM lens are enhanced by the High-Speed Imager AF (MSC) technology, which allows for quick and accurate focusing, a crucial factor in macro photography. The focus limit switch can speed up autofocus in certain situations, making it easier to capture specific subjects without hunting for focus.

In contrast, the TTArtisan lens features an STM stepping motor that provides smooth and silent autofocus, which is beneficial for both photography and video recording. The eye recognition focus feature makes it easier to achieve sharp portraits by locking onto the subject’s eyes, enhancing the overall shooting experience. While both lenses perform well, the OM SYSTEM lens is better suited for macro applications.

Use Cases

The OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is perfect for photographers who specialize in macro photography, nature, and close-up shots. Its high-quality optics and weather-sealing allow for detailed work in various environments, making it a reliable choice for professionals and enthusiasts alike.

On the other hand, the TTArtisan AF 56mm F1.8 Fuji XF is geared more towards portrait photographers and those looking for a versatile lens for general shooting. Its large aperture and lightweight design make it great for low-light situations and everyday photography. While it may lack the macro capabilities of the OM SYSTEM lens, it offers excellent performance for its price point.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the OM SYSTEM Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro and the TTArtisan AF 56mm F1.8 Fuji XF largely depends on your photography needs. If you are focused on macro photography and require a lens with superior optical quality and weather resistance, the OM SYSTEM lens is the clear choice, albeit at a higher price of $549.99.

However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that excels in general photography and portraiture, the TTArtisan lens at $129.00 offers excellent value without the specialized features. Ultimately, your decision should align with your specific photography style and budget constraints.