OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II Micro Four Thirds vs Sony Alpha 6700 APS-C Interchangeable Lens Hybrid Camera
Updated August 2026 — OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II Micro Four Thirds wins on build and autofocus, Sony Alpha 6700 APS-C Interchangeable Lens Hybrid Camera wins on video and price.
The OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II excels in ruggedness and autofocus, while the Sony Alpha 6700 offers superior video capabilities and a lower price point.
Why OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II Micro Four Thirds is better
Weather Sealing
OM-1 Mark II has IP53 rating for dust and splash resistance.
Autofocus
OM-1 Mark II features 1,053 cross-type AF points.
Processing Power
OM-1 Mark II has TruePic X engine for faster processing.
Why Sony Alpha 6700 APS-C Interchangeable Lens Hybrid Camera is better
Video Features
Alpha 6700 supports 4K/60p and high frame rate recording.
Price
Alpha 6700 is priced at $1,498, making it more affordable.
Popularity
Alpha 6700 has a higher sales rank of 5,109.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II Micro Four Thirds | Sony Alpha 6700 APS-C Interchangeable Lens Hybrid Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 20MP BSI | 26MP APS-C |
| Video Recording | Limited | 4K/60p |
| Autofocus Points | 1,053 | AI Tracking |
| Weather Sealing | IP53 | None |
| Price | $1999.99 | $1498.00 |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
The OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II features a robust, weather-sealed design, making it ideal for outdoor photography. In contrast, the Sony Alpha 6700, while a capable APS-C camera, does not emphasize weather sealing as strongly. The OM-1 Mark II boasts an IP53 rating, ensuring protection against dust and splashes, and it can operate in temperatures as low as -10℃. This rugged design is particularly appealing for photographers who often shoot in challenging environments. The Alpha 6700, on the other hand, is designed for creativity on the go, prioritizing portability and ease of use over extreme weather durability.
Sensor Technology
In terms of sensor technology, the Olympus OM-1 Mark II utilizes a 20MP stacked BSI Live MOS sensor, providing impressive resolution and low noise performance. Meanwhile, the Sony Alpha 6700 features a 26MP APS-C format Exmor R back-illuminated CMOS sensor. While the Alpha 6700 offers higher resolution, the OM-1 Mark II’s stacked sensor design allows for faster processing speeds and improved computational photography capabilities. This difference in sensor technology highlights the unique strengths of each camera, with the OM-1 Mark II excelling in low-light conditions and the Alpha 6700 providing more detail in brighter settings.
Autofocus and Tracking Capabilities
The OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II excels in autofocus performance, featuring Cross Quad Pixel AF with 1,053 points that ensure high-precision focusing. This system allows for sharp images even in fast-paced situations, making it an excellent choice for wildlife photography. Conversely, the Sony Alpha 6700 incorporates a dedicated AI Processor that enhances subject recognition and tracking. While both cameras offer impressive autofocus systems, the OM-1 Mark II’s all cross-type focusing points provide a slight edge in terms of versatility across various shooting scenarios.
Video Recording Features
When it comes to video capabilities, the Sony Alpha 6700 stands out with its advanced recording features. It supports 4K/60p recording with 6K oversampling and 10-bit color depth, catering to filmmakers and content creators. The Alpha 6700 also supports high frame rate 4K 120p recording, which is perfect for slow-motion capture. In contrast, the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II does not emphasize video specifications in its description, focusing more on its still photography strengths. Therefore, for users prioritizing video production, the Alpha 6700 is the clear winner.
Processing Power
The Olympus OM-1 Mark II features the TruePic X engine, which delivers processing speeds up to three times faster than its predecessor. This enhanced processing power facilitates advanced computational photography functions such as Handheld High Res Shot, Live GND, and HDR shooting, making it a versatile tool for creative photography. Meanwhile, the Sony Alpha 6700, powered by the BIONZ XR processor, also delivers exceptional image quality but does not explicitly mention processing speed in its specifications. The speed offered by the OM-1 Mark II can be particularly beneficial for photographers looking to maximize their shooting efficiency in dynamic environments.
Price Points
In terms of pricing, the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II is currently priced at $1,999.99, whereas the Sony Alpha 6700 is available for $1,498.00. This means the Alpha 6700 is about 17% cheaper than the OM-1 Mark II. The price difference may influence buyers who are budget-conscious or those entering the mirrorless camera market. While both cameras offer unique features, the more accessible price of the Alpha 6700 could make it an attractive option for many photographers.
Popularity and Sales Rank
The Sony Alpha 6700 enjoys a significantly higher sales rank at 5,109, compared to the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II’s rank of 28,860. This suggests that the Alpha 6700 is more popular among consumers, possibly due to its competitive features and price point. The higher sales rank could indicate greater customer satisfaction or a stronger reputation in the market. For potential buyers, this popularity may provide additional confidence in the Alpha 6700’s performance and reliability.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the OM SYSTEM Olympus OM-1 Mark II and the Sony Alpha 6700 largely depends on your specific needs as a photographer. If you prioritize ruggedness, advanced autofocus capabilities, and exceptional still photography performance, the OM-1 Mark II is an excellent choice. However, if video recording, portability, and a lower price point are more important to you, the Sony Alpha 6700 stands out as a compelling option. Ultimately, both cameras offer unique strengths, making them suitable for different types of photography enthusiasts.

