Norelco Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face, Electric vs Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable
Updated July 2026 — Norelco Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face, Electric wins on performance and maintenance, Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable wins on value.
The Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face outperforms the Remington PF7320 in technology and user comfort, making it the better choice despite a higher price.
Why Norelco Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face, Electric is better
Performance
Norelco has a faster cutter at 12,000 cuts per minute.
Battery Life
Norelco offers 45 minutes of runtime compared to Remington's 40 minutes.
User Comfort
Norelco features a dual-sided blade and adjustable comb for better customization.
Why Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable is better
Price
Remington is priced at $29.97, making it more budget-friendly.
Simplicity
Remington has a straightforward design that is easy to use.
Noise Level
Remington features a quiet drive advanced motor for less noise.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Norelco Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face, Electric | Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $39.99 | $29.97 |
| Runtime | 45 minutes | 40 minutes |
| Charging | USB | USB |
| Sales Rank | 436 | 67944 |
| Blade Type | Stainless Steel | Surgical Steel |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
The Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face features an innovative design with a flexible 360 Blade that adapts to the contours of the face, allowing for greater control and comfort during grooming. In contrast, the Remington PF7320 is built with 2X flexing foils that also adjust to facial contours but lacks the 360-degree flexibility. While the Norelco has a sleek, modern aesthetic, the Remington’s design is straightforward and functional. The One 360 has a more premium feel, which is reflected in its higher price of $39.99 compared to the Remington's $29.97, making it about 33% more expensive.
Performance
The Philips Norelco One 360 excels in performance with its fast-moving cutter operating at 12,000 cuts per minute, making it efficient even on longer hair. The dual protection system ensures a comfortable shave, minimizing irritation. The Remington PF7320, while effective with its surgical steel blades, offers 40 minutes of runtime and requires the user to adapt to its system for optimal results. The Norelco’s advanced capabilities, including the ability to trim and shave with fewer passes, stand out, especially for users seeking precision. The difference in performance is significant, making the Norelco a more robust choice for those prioritizing quality.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery performance is crucial for electric shavers, and here the Philips Norelco One 360 leads with a 45-minute runtime after an 8-hour charge. It utilizes USB charging, which is convenient for travel, although it does not include a wall adapter. The Remington PF7320 offers 40 minutes of runtime but is designed for universal USB charging as well. While both options provide adequate battery life, the Norelco’s slightly longer runtime and modern charging system make it a more appealing choice overall, especially for those who frequently travel.
User Experience and Comfort
User comfort is paramount in shaving devices, and the Philips Norelco One 360 stands out with its dual-sided blade and unique 5-in-1 adjustable comb, allowing users to achieve various beard lengths easily. The design aims to prevent skin irritation, making it suitable for sensitive skin. Conversely, the Remington PF7320 features a quiet drive advanced motor and flexing foils that adapt to facial contours for a close shave. While both products aim to provide a comfortable experience, the Norelco’s additional features for customization and its focus on skin safety may offer a superior experience for users.
Maintenance and Durability
When it comes to maintenance, the Philips Norelco One 360 boasts a stainless steel blade that lasts up to 4 months, with a clear eject icon indicating when it’s time for a replacement. This feature minimizes hassle and ensures optimal performance over time. The Remington PF7320 does not specify blade longevity, but it does come with a head guard to protect the foils during storage. Overall, the Norelco offers a more straightforward maintenance experience due to its clear replacement indicators and longer-lasting blades, which can enhance the user’s grooming routine.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Both brands have established reputations in the grooming market, but the Philips Norelco One 360 has a better sales rank of 436, indicating its popularity and preference among consumers. The Remington PF7320, with a sales rank of 67,944, may not have the same level of acclaim. The higher sales rank of the Norelco suggests that it is favored for its innovation and effectiveness, which speaks volumes about its acceptance in the competitive electric shaver market.
Price Comparison
Price is always a significant factor in product comparison. The Philips Norelco One 360 is priced at $39.99, while the Remington PF7320 is about 25% cheaper at $29.97. This price difference could influence purchasing decisions, especially for budget-conscious consumers. However, the additional features and performance enhancements of the Norelco may justify its higher cost for users looking for a premium shaving experience. Ultimately, the decision may come down to whether the user prioritizes cost savings or advanced features.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, if you prioritize advanced technology, performance, and user comfort, the Philips Norelco One 360 Hybrid Face is the clear winner, despite its higher price. Its innovative 360-degree flexibility, superior battery life, and better sales ranking make it a compelling choice for anyone serious about grooming. On the other hand, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that still provides a solid shaving experience, the Remington PF7320 is a viable alternative. Ultimately, the choice depends on your personal grooming needs and budget considerations.

