vsversusfinder

Norelco Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series, Wet and Dry vs Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable

Updated August 2026 — Norelco Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series, Wet and Dry wins on battery and durability, Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable wins on price and noise.

The Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series outperforms the Remington PF7320 in shaving quality and comfort, making it the better choice for serious users.

Why Norelco Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series, Wet and Dry is better

Shaving Performance

Philips has 27 ComfortCut blades vs Remington's 2X Flexing Foils.

Battery Life

Philips offers 50 minutes of runtime compared to Remington's 40 minutes.

Durability

Philips has a 2-year blade lifetime, while Remington emphasizes battery care.

Why Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable is better

Price

Remington is $29.97, significantly cheaper than Philips at $49.96.

Weight

Remington is lighter, making it easier to handle.

Noise Level

Remington features a quieter motor for a more peaceful shave.

Overall score

Norelco Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series, Wet and Dry
85
Remington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable
70

Specifications

SpecNorelco Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series, Wet and DryRemington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable
Runtime50 minutes40 minutes
ChargingUSB-AUniversal USB
Blades27 ComfortCut2X Flexing Foils
WaterproofYesNo
Sales Rank2254967944

Dimension comparison

Norelco Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series, Wet and DryRemington PF7320 Remington Ultrastyle Rechargeable

Design and Aesthetics

Both the Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series and the Remington PF7320 offer stylish designs, but they cater to different preferences. The Philips Norelco comes in a striking Dark Forest Green color and features an ergonomic rubber handle that ensures a secure grip, even when wet. In contrast, the Remington PF7320 is also green but opts for a more streamlined look with a focus on function. While personal preference will guide your choice here, the Philips model's design is particularly user-friendly for those who may shave in wet conditions.

Shaving Performance

When it comes to shaving performance, the Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series has the edge with 27 self-sharpening ComfortCut blades designed for a smooth, clean shave, especially for sensitive skin. The 4D Flex Heads provide excellent adaptability to facial contours, which minimizes the risk of nicks and cuts. The Remington PF7320 features 2X Flexing Foils that adjust to your facial contours but delivers slightly less blade power with its surgical steel blades. Therefore, for those who prioritize a high-quality shave, the Philips Norelco is a stronger contender.

Battery Life and Charging

The Philips Norelco Shaver offers a solid 50 minutes of shaving time on a single charge, while the Remington PF7320 provides 40 minutes. While the difference of just 10 minutes may not seem significant, it can be crucial for users who shave frequently. Additionally, the Philips device charges via USB-A, which is compatible with many charging systems, although it does not include a power adapter. On the other hand, the Remington’s universal USB charging can work with any standard USB wall adapter, making it more versatile in terms of charging options.

Maintenance and Durability

The Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series is built for durability, with a 2-year lifetime for its self-sharpening blades, ensuring consistent performance over time. The device is fully washable, facilitating easy maintenance. In contrast, the Remington PF7320 emphasizes the importance of battery care, recommending that users run the battery low every six months to maintain its lifespan. While both devices require some form of maintenance, the Philips model offers a longer-lasting blade solution, which may appeal to users looking for a long-term investment.

Price Comparison

In terms of pricing, the Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series is priced at $49.96, while the Remington PF7320 is considerably cheaper at $29.97, making it about 40% less expensive. This significant price difference may attract budget-conscious consumers, but it’s crucial to weigh the additional features and performance capabilities offered by the Norelco model. While the Remington provides a more economical option, the Philips offers enhanced functionality that may justify the higher cost for many users.

User Experience and Comfort

User comfort is a vital aspect of any shaving device, and the Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series excels in this area with features designed to protect sensitive skin. The 4D Flex Heads maintain contact with the skin while minimizing irritation. Conversely, the Remington PF7320 focuses on a quieter experience with its advanced motor, engineered for less vibration and noise. While both shavers aim to enhance the user experience, the Philips model seems to offer more comfort-oriented features, especially for those with sensitive skin.

Popularity and Sales Rank

The Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series has a sales rank of 22,549, indicating a steady level of consumer interest, while the Remington PF7320 has a lower sales rank of 67,944. This disparity suggests that the Philips product is more popular among consumers, likely due to its superior features and performance. The higher sales rank of the Norelco model may also indicate greater customer satisfaction, which could be a critical factor for potential buyers.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Philips Norelco Shaver 2600 Series and the Remington PF7320 comes down to personal needs and budget. If you seek high performance, durability, and a comfortable shave, the Philips model is the superior option, despite its higher price tag of $49.96. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option that still delivers decent performance, the Remington PF7320 at $29.97 might be the right fit for you. Assessing your shaving habits and skin sensitivity will help guide your decision effectively.