PreSonus Quantum ES 2 USB-C Audio Interface with vs Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, APLS-HE
Updated August 2026 — PreSonus Quantum ES 2 USB-C Audio Interface with wins on software, Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, APLS-HE wins on price and build quality.
The PreSonus Quantum ES 2 offers great value for self-recording artists, while the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition excels in professional audio fidelity and plugin options.
Why PreSonus Quantum ES 2 USB-C Audio Interface with is better
Price
Quantum ES 2 is significantly cheaper at $262.99.
Software
Includes Studio One Pro software.
Gain
Offers +75 dB gain with MAX-HD preamps.
Why Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, APLS-HE is better
Audio Quality
Superior audio fidelity and build quality.
Plugins
Includes $1,300 worth of premium plugins.
Processing
Features UAD SOLO Core Processing for low-latency tracking.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | PreSonus Quantum ES 2 USB-C Audio Interface with | Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, APLS-HE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $262.99 | $599.00 |
| Mic Preamps | MAX-HD +75 dB | Unison Preamps |
| Connectivity | USB-C | Thunderbolt 3 |
| Included Software | Studio One Pro | LUNA Recording System |
| Sales Rank | 7848 | 4750 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the PreSonus Quantum ES 2 and Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition
When it comes to audio interfaces, the PreSonus Quantum ES 2 and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition are two strong contenders catering to different needs. Priced at $262.99, the Quantum ES 2 is about 56% cheaper than the Apollo Solo, which retails for $599.00. Both interfaces offer unique features aimed at enhancing the recording experience, making them suitable for various types of audio creators.
Key Features Comparison
The PreSonus Quantum ES 2 stands out with its high-performance signal flow and newly designed MAX-HD mic preamps that provide up to +75 dB of gain. This model is particularly appealing for musicians who require low-latency recording, making it perfect for self-produced tracks. On the other hand, the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition boasts UAD SOLO Core Processing, enabling tracking through various vintage plug-ins with near-zero latency. While both devices emphasize low-latency performance, the Apollo Solo offers a more extensive suite of recording plug-ins valued at over $1,300, which adds significant value for professional users.
Software Integration
The PreSonus Quantum ES 2 includes a perpetual license for Studio One Pro software, making it an enticing option for users looking for a complete recording solution right out of the box. Its Universal Control app allows for flexible monitoring and control, whether on a mobile or desktop device. Conversely, the Apollo Solo integrates seamlessly with the LUNA Recording System, designed exclusively for Mac users. Both software packages enhance the user experience, but the choice may depend on the preferred operating system and software ecosystem.
Build Quality and Design
Build quality is essential for durability and reliability in audio equipment. The Universal Audio Apollo Solo is known for its uncompromising analog design, superior components, and premium build quality, which many professionals appreciate. In comparison, while the PreSonus Quantum ES 2 offers excellent functionality and design, it may not match the premium feel and construction of the Apollo Solo. This difference may influence users who prioritize robust hardware for long-term use in various recording environments.
Monitoring and Outputs
For monitoring, the PreSonus Quantum ES 2 features bright and responsive LED metering, along with two balanced ¼-inch TRS main outputs and a high-power headphone output, allowing for flexible monitoring options. This is particularly beneficial for self-recording artists. In contrast, the Apollo Solo's best-in-class headphone amplifier provides loud, detailed, and low-noise monitoring, which is crucial for tracking and mixing. While both interfaces provide adequate monitoring capabilities, the Apollo Solo offers superior audio fidelity that may appeal to professionals.
Connectivity Options
The PreSonus Quantum ES 2 is equipped with USB-C connectivity, making it a versatile choice for various setups. It supports connections across mobile and desktop devices, ensuring that users can record wherever inspiration strikes. The Universal Audio Apollo Solo, on the other hand, utilizes Thunderbolt 3 for connectivity, which can offer faster data transfer rates and lower latency. However, this may limit its compatibility with users who do not have Thunderbolt ports. Overall, the choice of connectivity could impact users depending on their existing hardware.
Target Audience
The PreSonus Quantum ES 2 is geared towards self-made musicians and audio creators who need a reliable, cost-effective interface with essential features. Its price point makes it accessible for those just starting in music production. The Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition, with its advanced features and high-quality plug-ins, targets more experienced users and professional environments where superior audio quality and processing power are paramount. The sales ranks also reflect this; the Apollo Solo ranks higher at 4,750 compared to the Quantum ES 2's rank of 7,848.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the PreSonus Quantum ES 2 and the Universal Audio Apollo Solo Heritage Edition ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're a self-recording artist seeking an affordable, feature-rich interface that includes professional-grade software, the Quantum ES 2 is a fantastic choice at $262.99. However, if you're a professional looking for top-tier audio fidelity, extensive plug-in options, and superior build quality, the Apollo Solo, despite its higher price tag of $599.00, may be worth the investment. Each product has its strengths, so consider what features align best with your recording style and requirements.

