Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT vs Yeston GeForce RTX 3050
Updated August 2026 — Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT wins on features and memory, Yeston GeForce RTX 3050 wins on power.
The Sapphire 9070 XT offers superior performance and features, while the Yeston RTX 3050 is a budget-friendly option for casual gamers.
Why Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT is better
Memory Size
16 GB vs 6 GB
Performance
Higher performance for AAA games
Connectivity
More output options available
Why Yeston GeForce RTX 3050 is better
Price
$258.99 vs $769.99
Form Factor
Low-profile design for compact builds
Power Efficiency
Lower power consumption at 70W
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT | Yeston GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | 16 GB GDDR6 | 6 GB GDDR6 |
| Core Frequency | N/A | 1042/1470 MHz |
| Cooling | Advanced | Basic |
| Power Supply | Recommended 750W | Recommended 400W |
| Outputs | 2 HDMI, 2 DP | 1 HDMI, 1 DP |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Graphics Cards
When comparing the Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT and the Yeston GeForce RTX 3050, it’s clear that they cater to different segments of the gaming market. The Sapphire 9070 XT is priced at $769.99, while the Yeston RTX 3050 is significantly more affordable at $258.99. This makes the Yeston approximately 66% cheaper than the Sapphire, positioning it as a budget-friendly option for gamers.
Performance Capabilities
The performance of the Sapphire 9070 XT is superior due to its higher memory capacity of 16 GB GDDR6, compared to the 6 GB GDDR6 memory of the Yeston RTX 3050. This larger memory size enables the Sapphire card to handle more demanding gaming applications and higher resolutions more effectively. The Sapphire features a 256-bit memory interface, enhancing its data transfer rates, whereas the Yeston has a 96-bit interface. Gamers looking for high-end performance will find the Sapphire more suitable for modern AAA titles.
Design and Form Factor
In terms of design, the Yeston GeForce RTX 3050 is a low-profile graphics card, making it ideal for mini and small form factor (SSF) builds. Its dimensions of 158mm x 68mm x 20mm allow for easy installation in compact cases. Conversely, the Sapphire 9070 XT has a standard form factor that may require more space but offers advanced cooling solutions to maintain optimal temperatures during intensive gaming sessions. Users with limited space might prefer the Yeston for its compact design.
Cooling Solutions
Cooling is an essential factor for maintaining performance during long gaming sessions. The Sapphire 9070 XT is equipped with advanced cooling technology, which is vital for its high-performance capabilities. This card is designed to handle the heat generated during intense gaming. On the other hand, the Yeston RTX 3050 employs a simpler cooling solution, which is adequate for its lower power requirements but may not be as effective under heavy load. Gamers should consider their usage patterns when evaluating these cooling features.
Connectivity Options
The connectivity options offered by each graphics card differ significantly. The Sapphire 9070 XT provides two HDMI and two DisplayPort outputs, allowing users to connect multiple monitors easily. This is particularly beneficial for gamers who use multi-monitor setups or require high refresh rates. In contrast, the Yeston RTX 3050 features one HDMI 2.1 and one DisplayPort 1.4a, which, while sufficient for most users, limits its connectivity compared to the Sapphire. Those who prioritize extensive connectivity may lean towards the Sapphire model.
Gaming Compatibility and Features
Both graphics cards support modern gaming features, but the capabilities differ greatly. The Sapphire 9070 XT supports AMD’s RDNA 4 architecture, which enhances performance and efficiency during gaming. It is designed for high-end gaming, offering superior visual quality and framerates in demanding titles. Meanwhile, the Yeston RTX 3050 supports DirectX 12, Vulkan API, and ray tracing, making it a viable option for gamers interested in newer gaming technologies. However, the overall performance in high-demand games will still favor the Sapphire.
Power Requirements and Efficiency
Power consumption is another critical aspect to consider. The Sapphire 9070 XT has a more substantial power requirement, necessitating a robust power supply to support its performance. In contrast, the Yeston RTX 3050 has a much lower power consumption of approximately 70W, making it more energy-efficient and easier to integrate into systems with limited power supplies. For users looking to build a system with lower energy costs, the Yeston may be a more appealing choice.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Sapphire 11348-03-20G Pulse AMD Radeon™ RX 9070 XT and the Yeston GeForce RTX 3050 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a serious gamer looking for high performance and are willing to invest $769.99, the Sapphire offers superior memory capacity, performance, and connectivity options. However, if budget constraints are a consideration and you need a compact solution for less demanding games, the Yeston at $258.99 provides a solid option without breaking the bank. Each card serves its purpose well, catering to different types of gamers.

