vsversusfinder

Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-Inch vs YARDMAX 22 in. 201cc Select PACE 6 Speed CVT High

Updated July 2026 — Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-Inch wins on sales rank, YARDMAX 22 in. 201cc Select PACE 6 Speed CVT High wins on price and weight.

The YARDMAX offers superior performance and features, making it the better choice for most homeowners.

Why Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-Inch is better

Price

Scotts is significantly cheaper at $149.99.

Weight

Scotts is lighter and easier to maneuver manually.

Eco-friendly

Scotts is a manual mower, requiring no gas or oil.

Why YARDMAX 22 in. 201cc Select PACE 6 Speed CVT High is better

Cutting Width

YARDMAX has a larger 22-inch cutting width.

Engine Power

YARDMAX features a powerful 201cc engine.

Ease of Use

YARDMAX has an automatic choke for easier starting.

Overall score

Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-Inch
65
YARDMAX 22 in. 201cc Select PACE 6 Speed CVT High
85

Specifications

SpecScotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-InchYARDMAX 22 in. 201cc Select PACE 6 Speed CVT High
EngineManual201cc
TransmissionN/ACVT
Cutting System5-Blade3-in-1
Start TypeManualAutomatic Choke
Deck CleanoutNoYes

Dimension comparison

Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-InchYARDMAX 22 in. 201cc Select PACE 6 Speed CVT High

Price Comparison

In terms of pricing, the Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S is the more economical choice at $149.99, compared to the YARDMAX, which is priced at $359.99. This means the YARDMAX is approximately 140% more expensive than the Scotts model. For consumers looking to save, the Scotts mower offers a significantly lower initial investment without sacrificing quality. The Scotts mower’s price point positions it as an attractive option for budget-conscious homeowners who still want an effective mowing solution.

Cutting Performance

When comparing cutting performance, the YARDMAX outshines the Scotts with its 22-inch cutting width and a powerful 201cc engine. The YARDMAX’s engine allows for efficient cutting and adaptability to various lawn conditions. In contrast, the Scotts features a 20-inch cutting width and relies on a manual push mechanism. While the Scotts provides a clean cut with its 5-blade system, it may require more effort on the user’s part, especially in thicker grass. Thus, the YARDMAX’s engine and larger cutting width make it a preferable choice for larger or more challenging lawns.

Ease of Use

The YARDMAX is designed for ease of use, featuring an automatic choke system that eliminates the need for priming or choking before starting. This ensures a hassle-free experience for users. On the other hand, the Scotts requires manual effort, as it is a push mower with no motor. While the Scotts is lightweight and easy to operate, it may not be as user-friendly for those who prefer a more automated mowing experience. The YARDMAX’s continuously variable transmission (CVT) also allows users to adjust the mowing pace to their walking speed, making it more adaptable during operation.

Maneuverability

In terms of maneuverability, the YARDMAX excels with its high rear wheels and aggressive spiked tread tires, which enhance traction on uneven terrain. This feature allows users to navigate challenging landscapes more effectively. Conversely, while the Scotts has dual tracking wheels for improved movement, it lacks the advanced tire technology found in the YARDMAX. This makes the YARDMAX a better choice for homeowners with uneven lawns or those who need to tackle various terrains.

Maintenance

The YARDMAX includes convenient features for maintenance, such as a deck cleanout port that allows easy cleaning of the mower’s underside. This ensures that the mower remains in optimal working condition with minimal effort. The Scotts, however, does not offer any similar cleaning features. Although it is simpler in design, the lack of maintenance conveniences may lead to more effort required in keeping the Scotts mower clean and functional over time. Therefore, for users who value easy upkeep, the YARDMAX is the superior option.

Storage Options

When it comes to storage, the YARDMAX is designed with space-saving in mind; it can be compactly folded for easy storage in tight spaces. This feature is particularly useful for homeowners with limited garage space. In contrast, the Scotts does not mention any specific storage features, which may make it less convenient for those who need to store their mower in small areas. The foldable design of the YARDMAX adds significant value for users who prioritize easy storage solutions.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

The YARDMAX holds a better sales rank at 6068 compared to the Scotts, which has a sales rank of 16124. This indicates that the YARDMAX is more popular among consumers, possibly due to its advanced features and performance capabilities. Brand reputation can play a significant role in purchasing decisions, and the YARDMAX’s higher sales rank may suggest greater customer satisfaction. The Scotts, while a trusted name, may appeal more to traditional users who prefer manual mowing.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S and the YARDMAX 22 in. 201cc self-propelled lawn mower depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly, eco-friendly option for smaller lawns and enjoy manual mowing, the Scotts is a solid pick. However, if you prioritize cutting performance, ease of use, and advanced features for larger or uneven lawns, the YARDMAX is the superior choice, despite its higher price.