Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone vs Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone wins on noise rejection and sound quality, Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone wins on value for money.
The Sennheiser E602 II offers superior sound quality and a complete setup, while the Shure PGA57 is a more budget-friendly option with versatile applications.
Why Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone is better
Sound Quality
E602 II provides richer low-end response.
Build Quality
E602 II has a rugged aluminum body.
Accessories
E602 II includes a tripod stand and cable.
Why Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone is better
Price
PGA57 is significantly cheaper.
Popularity
PGA57 has a higher sales rank.
Versatility
PGA57 is suitable for a wider range of users.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone | Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cardioid | Dynamic |
| Connector | XLR | XLR |
| Frequency Response | 40Hz-18kHz | 50Hz-15kHz |
| Weight | 0.5 lbs | 0.4 lbs |
| Polar Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Sennheiser E602 II and Shure PGA57
The Sennheiser E602 II is priced at $159.00, while the Shure PGA57 is significantly cheaper at $71.00, making it about 55% less expensive. This price difference positions the PGA57 as a more budget-friendly option for those seeking quality audio without breaking the bank. Both microphones cater to musicians and audio engineers, but their features and designs appeal to different types of users, which we'll explore further in this comparison.
Design and Build Quality
The Sennheiser E602 II features a rugged, lightweight aluminum body, ensuring stability when positioned on long microphone boom arms. This durable construction appeals to professionals who may use it in various settings. On the other hand, the Shure PGA57 boasts an updated industrial design with a black metallic finish, providing an unobtrusive presence while maintaining good durability. While both microphones are designed to withstand the rigors of performance and recording, the Sennheiser may have a slight edge in terms of robustness due to its aluminum body.
Sound Quality
When it comes to sound reproduction, the Sennheiser E602 II is engineered with a high-performance voice coil construction that delivers fast transient response and low-frequency extension. This makes it ideal for capturing the nuances of problematic bass signals. Conversely, the Shure PGA57 is tailored for clear reproduction of sound sources and features a cardioid polar pattern that effectively picks up audio while rejecting unwanted noise. Both microphones excel in delivering quality sound, but the E602 II may provide a richer low-end response, especially beneficial for bass-heavy instruments.
Versatility and Use Cases
The Sennheiser E602 II is particularly suited for direct use on challenging bass signals, making it a preferred choice for bass guitarists and drummers. Its design allows it to handle a variety of instruments, ensuring flexibility during performances. The Shure PGA57, however, is versatile in its own right, excelling in amplified instrument and acoustic drum performance recording. It also comes with a stand adapter for easy mounting, catering to users who may prefer different setups. Both microphones are suitable for various applications, but the E602 II is more specialized for low-frequency instruments.
Accessories and Package Inclusions
The Sennheiser E602 II comes bundled with an MS-5220T tripod microphone stand and a 20-foot XLR-XLR cable, adding to its value for users who need a complete setup right out of the box. In contrast, the Shure PGA57 offers two options: one with a 15-foot XLR-XLR cable and one without. While the PGA57 provides flexibility in purchasing options, the bundled accessories of the E602 II may provide a more comprehensive package for those who need everything to get started immediately.
Popularity and Sales Rank
In terms of popularity, the Sennheiser E602 II has a sales rank of 49,783, indicating a moderate level of sales. The Shure PGA57, however, ranks significantly higher at 20,657, suggesting it is a more popular choice among consumers. This higher sales rank could be attributed to its lower price point and versatile applications, making it an attractive option for a broader audience.
Target Audience
The Sennheiser E602 II primarily targets professional musicians and audio engineers who require high-quality sound reproduction, particularly for low-end instruments. Its robust build and specialized features make it ideal for serious performers. The Shure PGA57, with its lower price and versatile design, appeals to a wider range of users, including hobbyists and semi-professionals. This microphone is suitable for those who want professional sound quality without the higher investment.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Sennheiser E602 II and the Shure PGA57 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are focused on capturing low-frequency instruments and need a robust, complete setup, the Sennheiser E602 II at $159.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you're looking for a versatile microphone that provides great sound quality at a more accessible price point of $71.00, the Shure PGA57 stands out as a budget-friendly option. Consider your usage scenarios and preferences to make the best decision for your audio needs.

